Ran is my top pick atm. Asks pointless questions (what PLSD thought of Zen, when neither had even read the game), reacts very poorly (seems fake) to the daycop gambit, including a claim whose timing suggests it's a safe claim and a call for a call for a Zen claim. His role is provable, but nothing guarantees that it is not scum. Seems to be ignoring my question about the use of his night action too. Wonder if he'll answer it now.
Kk so looking back I was actually wrong, I actually find your case on Ran to be one of the least convincing. Asking pointless questions is definitely not the case, for Ran that is scumhunting and I agree with SK's early assessment that the questions may seem strange but at least he follows up on them. I also don't agree that he reacted poorly to the daycop gambit, looking at his motivation he pushed for Zen to be lynched for the fake guilty because he thought he was scum, I have no reason to doubt that he believed that and valued Zen's lynch over self-preservation. Role speculation leans town, and while you may disagree with his choices he clearly thinks the people he would have been narrowing the lynch pool into were scum and it was to help town. Why would he even admit who he was going to put up for the lynch if it wasn't genuine?
KK is probs my next pick. He's been challenging everyone to show why he is scum, claiming that nobody has done so, when in reality he is just dismissing every point against him as stupid. 1647, 1649 is a prime example - he just calls every point BS and calls people stupid and flat out wrong. His case on me is full of misrepresentation and reaching (1414 - in talking about Ryker he quotes me but leaves out literally the most important word in the quote and attacks his strawman instead). He calls me out for shallow reads (one of the main pillars of his case), based on who agrees with me, and then when asked about his reasoning on July, he gives in 1629 that he agrees with what she has to say and that he sees town intent, which no deeper than the reasoning for my reads.
The bolded part is absolutely true, there was no legit case on KK and it was frustrating to watch people reach for a case on him, just like this case was reaching. His #1414 and subsequent posts building his case on you are him looking at your intentions and sincerity, and i know even from the beginning KK had questions about your sincerity that came through even more when you listed your full reads and the reasoning was weak and the lines between null and scum seemed arbitrary. His view on me should make sense in retrospect, but at the time it wasn't obvious.
July is next scum pick. It felt very off that she brought up the time travel suggestion as a way of dealing with Ran. Just felt like wild speculation and I'm not sure what to make of it. More importantly, she has been on DG hard this whole game. Nothing wrong with staying hard on your scumpick, but I feel that she is using it as an excuse to avoid providing stances on other players. She mentions that she thinks I'm town in 565, and I don't get mentioned again until I jump to a top three scum pick in 1132, where she is directly asked for her reads. She says it's because I haven't been "digging in and providing content", the only questions I got from her were requests for clarification. I felt absolutely no pressure from July. Her other pick here is PLSD, who was an easy pick to list.
The bolded line is wrong, and I put my reads out there as best I could and in fact I remember listing a bunch of reads at the request of Ran. While I was pushing hard on my scum read, I was also scumhunting. I also post infrequently, so from 565 I had to take in a lot of information, and I remember asking you multiple times about part of your post that bothered me and made me reread you and find your posts underwhelming. If you felt no pressure from me then that is my fault, but my read from you built through discontent at you present play and then retrospection on your play.
good to see ewe conveniently pop in after all the action 
