Double post? Don't care. I like both of them.
People like to play pretend that Bowser's punish game is somehow stronger than other characters, but it's easy to forget that he gets punished at least as hard as any of his opponents, who typically have touch of death on him. This means that not only does he have to climb way uphill to win neutral at all, but he has to win neutral many more times in order to level out the punish game. His weaknesses in neutral and the punish game amplify each other in an exponential fashion.
Just to grossly simplify things, let's say that it's twice as difficult for Bowser to hit Fox in neutral as the converse. Similarly, let's also say that Bowser can punish Fox roughly half as hard as Fox can punish Bowser -- in this hugely oversimplified model, this means that a Bowser player needs to work four times as hard as a Fox player of equal skill in that matchup.
I'm not saying that Bowser has to work twice as hard in neutral, or that his punishes are half as hard as Fox's. I'm saying it's much, much worse than that on both counts.
Is that okay? It's not with me, but I, of course, am just a whiny, fraudulent, gimmicky solo main who doesn't happen to play a Melee top tier. So, I'm biased.