Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This world doesn't need 48 more lame mfers32) King Dedede 2.35416666666667 (=)
Taken from 48 strangers, of which you can view all of their responses here
Also here's the last one from april
We get it Netherrealm. You made MK9 (which is a much better game anyway). But if people wanted to play MK characters versus DC characters, there's already a game for that. But I digress.
Let's talk more about Sonic, guys.
Sorry. I'm not attacking you or your thread. I don't think it's "hurting" the metagame, but I do think it isn't that productive for the metagame. Mostly because if we discuss tier lists, we mostly talk about what makes characters good and bad without taking anything specific into account. For example, Sonic is awesome because of X and Y, and Ness is horrible because of W and Z. This kind of talk only makes us think there are huge gaps between characters, and the metagame is stalled at that line of thinking. Whereas if we talk about matchups, we could find that Ness actually beats Sonic because we discussed strategy and came up with strategy U and V. And with that, we advance the metagame and balance the cast out with match up strategy.The reason I made them was for the purpose of showing an easy-to-digest history of how a P:M metagame will be like. Is it accurate? Probably not, but it isn't supposed to be, it's supposed to be an indication of what the community thinks is good right now. No matter what, people are going to think there's better characters than others, and if acknowledging that is somehow "hurting" the metagame, then I guess I'll be first to run it with explosives attached to me.
You gaywe can START here.
Low tier in Project M =/= Low tier in Melee.
You can't just say "low tier doesn't exist!" because it will always exist. That's just a fact. In any game with characters that do different things there will be a high tier, and a low tier, with some middle ground. Even if this game was incredibly balanced, to the point where any given character would be placed in high tier if not higher relative to Melee's balance, there would still be a low tier.
So, when we say that Ness is low tier are we saying that Ness is still as weak as a low tier character in Melee? Ness was buffed, but so was everybody else, so maybe Ness is still low tier in relation to the Project M cast but NOT to the Melee cast (Note, I have virtually no experience with Ness so I have no idea if he's actually low tier or not, he's just an example).
When people say that low tier shouldn't exist I facepalm. Low tier will always exist, but the definition of low tier changes from game to game. Let's say we were to rate every character on their powerlevel with a scale from 1-100. Let's say that somehow you were able to get every character up to say, 88 or higher. You would still rate the characters who are at 88-90 or whatever low tier, because despite still being strong, they are the statistically weakest characters in the cast.
InProject M, the gap between tiers is smaller than it was in Melee for sure, but it's still there.
Don't worry about it (I've probably been too aggressive to begin with regarding this, sorry about that).
That's actually smart, too. I tried going for more of a tier list on MUs before, but people HAVE tried that before and... it tends to not work very well. A lot of it comes down to there not being enough players willing to fill out a long survey for it; Assuming everyone from the survey I made did this theoretical survey for matchups, there'd still be roughly half of the cast with any more than a single person for that MU in particular.
Maybe ask for MUs on each character board and work from there? You'd get directly to the heart of it (since the more notable posters in most boards have a huge understanding of their characters), but it still has the problem where boards like jiggs' are basically empty.
WTF who cares if those people are here or notIt doesn't work because no one that plays this game competitively uses these forums or wants to bother discussing the game.
When's the last time you saw Hungrybox or Zimmermanson around these parts?
????
Luigi perfectly balanced with Spacies
PLEASE give me a moment to soak this in, I can't go from bashing on Sonic to having a good time laughing at what you may have just said
Do you mean balanced as in Luigi can do ok vs Spacies
OR
That he's "comparable" to Spacies in viability or results or whatever
What did you just say my friend? Your answer may determine your future because you may be a little GOONIE if you think Luigi is as good as a ****in Spacie holy **** the world would be great
He was responding to me.DMG I'm confused as to whether or not you're responding to me, my avatar, or something else entirely
Drugs are for thugs.Oh yeah I forgot, I need the best Luigi in the world in my backyard before I criticize that Pickle of a character. You literally could hold back real buff progress for that character with talks like that. While we're at it, might as well say Ganon is as good as Falco. Bet you don't play with Kage all day, what now son? Gonna use that Cucumber of a man to prove me wrong?
(I like Luigi, but please put down the sugar and drugs if you think he's as good as a ****in certified spacies)
Eli knows what's up. **** Fox bro, he's a ***** nugga