Vashimus
Smash Master
Because you got a boner over Ivysaur, remember?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
snake is my best character whats yours?It's really annoying when I don't see Snake anywhere but bottom tier, he is garbage at best.
Snake is, how come?snake is my best character whats yours?
idk its just really easy to control my foes with his moves.Snake is, how come?
LOL You obviously didn't read the rest of this thread.idk its just really easy to control my foes with his moves.
I 4 stock Jolteon twice somewhere in there, and he feels that salt.*clicks just to see the Snake ditto*
you expect me to go through all of thatLOL You obviously didn't read the rest of this thread.
I said I was joking and that I think Snake is a great character, I even posted vids of me playing Snake
http://www.twitch.tv/jolte0n/b/397043456
0:00 - 9:17 vs Hoe4u (Pikachu)
17:16 - 32:02 vs Jolteon (Snake Dittos lol)
37:56 - 53:31 vs Alpha Dash (Wario/R.O.B/Diddy)
lol I don't expect you to do anything, but since you didn't know I thought I would just clarify it for you.you expect me to go through all of that
You hoe.I 4 stock Jolteon twice somewhere in there, and he feels that salt.
<3 Jolteon.
Fair enough, seems reasonable in comparison to how much the current public metagame has gone so far.Hey, Prof. I have Snake in my 3rd tier (or 4) which is High Mid on my tier list.
Why is he not in bottom tier?
#unviable
TL is basically in the same tier (a lot of characters are, imo). They're not the greatest characters, obviously but they're far from bad or unviable. My tier distinctions are basically 3-4 amazing characters, ~7 great characters, a bunch of solid to good characters, and then like 6 mediocre to bad characters. I think TL and Snake are good characters, but they could be great for all I know. There's a lot to be seen, hell GnW is placing well in Texas of all places. A solo-GnW at that (<3 you Dakpo).Fair enough, seems reasonable in comparison to how much the current public metagame has gone so far.
Though I do feel if I was to live in America and attend some events he might be moved up a few places on some people's lists lol
Same with Jolteon and T.Link , but I am obviously slightly bias
So what are your tier lists based off?TL is basically in the same tier (a lot of characters are, imo). They're not the greatest characters, obviously but they're far from bad or unviable. My tier distinctions are basically 3-4 amazing characters, ~7 great characters, a bunch of solid to good characters, and then like 6 mediocre to bad characters. I think TL and Snake are good characters, but they could be great for all I know. There's a lot to be seen, hell GnW is placing well in Texas of all places. A solo-GnW at that (<3 you Dakpo).
You missed my point lol.Presumed notions mostly of character strength and solo-tournament ability:
- Tier 1 are characters that I think are not only strong, but can be played solo through tournaments with great success. (Top Tier - Best Characters, can easily solo a tournament.)
- Tier 2 (High Tier - Great Characters, may have some favorable MUs vs better characters, may not. Has a chance to win tournaments by themselves.)
- Tier 3 (High-Mid Tier - Good Characters. Might be able to reasonably solo a tournament, probably needs help in terms of MU or MU unfamiliarity.)
- Tier 4 (Mid Tier - Solid Characters to Mediocre Characters. Certainly not bad, but unlikely to be able to navigate though the better characters to win tournaments and could certainly place favorably. Probably have some niche use in MUs that are favorable and could have solid MUs against most of the cast, but not enough advantages or good traits to solidify better placement. Could more likely win tournaments coupled with a secondary to cover disadvantaged MUs.)
- "I think TL and Snake are good characters, but they could be great for all I know. There's a lot to be seen."You missed my point lol.
I wasn't asking how you are grouping the characters, but instead what are you basing MAKING the tier list off in the first place?
lol at debatably even putting Snake in 'unlikely to win tournaments' category but opinions will be opinions
And what is your tier list anyway out of curiousity?
The comment I made about Snake debatably being in the 'unlikely to win tournament' category was mostly due to this comment.- "I think TL and Snake are good characters, but they could be great for all I know. There's a lot to be seen."
- "Tier 3 (High-Mid Tier - Good Characters. Might be able to reasonably solo a tournament, probably needs help in terms of MU or MU unfamiliarity.)"
Where did you see me put Snake as unlikely to win tournaments? ""
Excuse me if I don't know what you mean by "what are you basing making the tier list off of in the first place?".
This is my current 2.5b tier grouping. The order of the characters within the tiers has no sort of significance.
But either way, my central question still stands lol.Hey, Prof. I have Snake in my 3rd tier (or 4) which is High Mid on my tier list.
Fair enough, seems overall a reasonable approach, well that's mostly what I wanted to know anyway so thanksOh, "or" is supposed to be "of". My bad.
In a game that I think is so diverse (and is showing to be), it's kind of hard but I was mostly basing my tier list on how "strong" a character felt to me. That sounds vague as hell (and it is), mostly because it's an opinionated thought on how good I thought a characters traits/matchups were against most of the cast. This has drawn from talking to a lot of players (obviously) and reading stuff on the boards, watching videos and personal theory-craft. Then when I thought about the "strength" of a character, I tried to think about how likely a character would be able to use them and win tournaments by themselves (this was using what appeared to be top players of the current meta among other things). It's all hella vague though, because there's still so much we don't know about the game.
So much that I don't even really want to order them as if I could say with certainty that "Lucario is the 16th best character" or whatever.
I agree with Armada because lolboneslogic. Tournament results and tier lists show very different things. It's easy to look at results and just say who's won the most. Comparing characters in relation to one another, on the other hand, actually requires a bit of thinking. Theory crafting is an amazing tool, it's just a lot of people, especially early on in the metagame, are misguided in how they analyze characters. KirbyKaze is a testiment to the power of Theory Crafting: If he's having a problem, he looks at the situation and addresses it using theory before testing it in practice. That is the key to effective theory crafting- the application of the theory, showing it can be done in practice.What I find baffling is that a lot of people look down on theory-crafting when making tier lists in general.
"I'm not gonna THEORY-CRAFT. I'm just gonna win tournaments with DDD. "
Then Armada comes out and says the problem with the community tier lists is that we focus too much on results rather than actually looking at how solid the characters are on their own and their matchups. And then everyone agrees with him because he's Armada. Dafuq?
I suppose if you dropped somewhere at random, you'd have a 97% chance of dropping into what we call "Freemerica", which is anywhere farther than 50 miles away from the New York-New Jersey Border.Though I do feel if I was to live in America and attend some events he might be moved up a few places on some people's lists lol
Then what the hell is bubbaking doingTheory crafting is not assuming frame perfection
Theory crafting is not wistful ignorance of factors
Theory crafting does not make any claims to say for certain that a character will win a tournament or beat a character
.
I look down on theory-crafting at this current stage (or at least the way I've seen it used the extreme majority of the time so far), because it's being done at a stage where some character's metagames haven't been developed and a lot of MU's haven't been played between people who understand their characters or are good enough in their character's development to make the claims.What I find baffling is that a lot of people look down on theory-crafting when making tier lists in general.
"I'm not gonna THEORY-CRAFT. I'm just gonna win tournaments with DDD. "
Then Armada comes out and says the problem with the community tier lists is that we focus too much on results rather than actually looking at how solid the characters are on their own and their matchups. And then everyone agrees with him because he's Armada. Dafuq?
Bubbaking of course.Then what the hell is bubbaking doing
Sheik is a top tier character in Melee even with a softban on her chaingrabs. She still has one of the easiest times shield pokemon by far, and has top notch rewards off strong reads.So everyone says shiek is one of the best character in the game. Why is that, is it just because Shiek's stuff is still as potent and no new character can really threaten it, even without NTSC down throw or does she do well for a reason I am unaware of?