Nouc also got 7th...I believe Rice got 9th too!!!
![Colorful :colorful: :colorful:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/colorful.gif)
![Colorful :colorful: :colorful:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/colorful.gif)
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I got my money back for 2v2 teams, completely forgot about getting money back for 1v1 singles cause I was so **** tired lol :/Lobster your name was called but you didnt play, did you get your money back before leaving?
LOL ur an ignorant noob. i agree DF should def be 2nd or 1st cuz he has beaten ube ice and a bunch random noobs in his brackets(besides colbol) he's definately 2nd in the power ranking ur a genious hahaha.....anyway
Pwr rankings seem hard to determine especially for a region like ours. We are so big that not everyone can attend tournys in each area of our state. It seems that the top 2 are DF and Shiz.
In the following order:
1. Shiz
2. DF
But 3rd seems to hit grey, I could see any one of these names landing in 3rd
3. rock/green/UI/lamb/colbol/speeden
I my self lean more to col/speed for 3rd. With the others mentioned fighting over 4th but, I can see where I may be bias in that regard.
u should be benching 300 by now....Yay I'm so happy, just benched 200 4 times in a row.
, new record.
except DF only truly beat UI and shizwiz anihaliated DF after losing to him in the end he lost to shiz cuz shiz won the last set and by alot too.1shiz.2speedn.3me cuz my c0ck is bigger than rock's vag1na.4?.5?.6?7?8?.9?.10mavericks' c0ck?3. DF? At the March Giga he beat UI and Shiz. Queen has beaten UI and nearly beat Shiz on multiple occasions.
5. Col - Can't really argue with anything that was said... hm...
Placing them by their match-ups, especially character match-ups, would be ideal, and probably one of the top reasons this has been difficult. Basing it solely on tournament placings over multiple tournaments effectively removes debate.Edit: The way you should view the way people should be ranked not including tourney results is by their matchups, which helps place them without tourney results.