Thanks Jfox
ure awesome
anyway... i wanna play
and i cant.... its a cruel world lol
anyway... i wanna play
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Is this the list for Viva la Smashtaclysm?Triad, whats your deal man...you keep shyin away from telling people what your plan is.
Edit: right now it looks like:
Cheezit, JFox, Bass, Treble, Eggm, Marcus
Maybe's:
Tec0, Triad, Reik, Moo, Jota
Edit2: I already requested off work...w00t
I'm probably not going to go because I don't like the stage counterpicking rules. DK64, Rainbow Cruise, and 2 other stages out of all the non neutrals will be counterpickable and one of those can be banned. And even if Poke Floats is one of the 4(which it probably won't be because it's in last place right now and the poll closes in 3 days) I'm not gonna go on principle of all other non neutrals being banned.Are you planning on going with TSA, teh_spamerer?
am i still going with you?I can't wait to go. I've been learning a lot ab out the game lately. Can't wait.
It's not trivial. There is no reason at all to have so many stages banned when they shouldn't be banned.Cat 3 was the best tourney I ever attended missing the sequel over something so trivial is dumb.
That was uncalled for, I don't recall ever whining about the way a tournament was run, if they used laggy TVs, or about my bracket.better you not go than everyone have to listen to you whine about it the whole time
i remember the old tjd days, good times good timesI guess I'm not really a THP member since I counterpick normal stages XD
It isn't about gaying opponents on stage counterpicks, it's about having fun. That's why I went Link vs Bass, I thought it would be fun. I just happen to have more fun fighting Marth on Corneria than I do on FD.teh_spamerer, you are still a THP player at heart. Just cuz you can't gay out your opponent with stage counterpicks, you choose to not go to a large scale tourney.
You should rely more on your skill, and be confident that you will win with that.
Yet you don't have any proof at all, which makes my argument better by default.Your "proof" is pretty shabby. Those are mere examples, and poor ones at that.
If they're marginally better than me, they should win the first match which will be on a neutral and then they can counterpick a gay stage that gives their character an advantage or a neutral stage where they can win since they're better than me anyways. Regardless of which of those two they choose, they will win because they're better. So what is the purpose then of banning non neutrals?Most of those examples are people that are significantly better than you are. However, if the skill difference is marginal, your opponent may not be able to beat you on a stage that gives you enough advantage that it overcomes the skill gap.
Actually, I would save a lot of money by not going because I'd have to pay for housing, entry fees, gas money, and food. So really, I'm saving a lot of money.By not coming to a tournament simply for this reason, you are not hurting anyone but yourself. Do you think with the huge turnout that Smashtaclysm will receive, they will take into consideration the opinion of amediocreterrible smasher? Unless you are someone with a name, or your opinion is backed by a large part of the community, your sacrifice will just be forgotten.
It really has nothing to do with how well I'd place. I think it's ******** to only have neutrals + 4 stages and only one of those 4 stages can be banned with no resets. Some of the neutrals make HUGE differences for characters, why does it matter if counterpick stages do as well?And really....is it that big a deal? They are just stages, and you can still do some counterpicks. And you can still pick whatever fun characters you want. So....just go lol.
thats why most IC mains have counterpickson the stage argument.... you try winning against a space animal on pokefloats with ice climber then come back to me and say its not gay![]()
Thats really bad logic. I can give plenty of stupid examples of how counterpick stages have changed the outcome of events. Here's one that is equally as dumb as your are: I lost to Xeorouge once in a tournament about 4 months ago. I pretty much always win in our friendlies, which are all played on neutral stages. I lost the first match cuz I played very poorly on FD. Than I counterpicked Yoshi's Story and 3 stocked him(and happened to be playing fantastically that match). Than he counterpicked Brinstar and two stocked me. I can't even explain to you how much Brinstar screwed me that match. I was lava combo'd 70+ percent, he was saved by lava, the lava was screwing up my combos, etc etc.Yet you don't have any proof at all, which makes my argument better by default.
Neutral stages are called neutral because TYPICALLY they give very little advantage to any character. I don't think there is a single neutral stage that gives a strong advantage to any character. They typically give only slight or no advantage to characters, and that is why they are called neutral.If they're marginally better than me, they should win the first match which will be on a neutral and then they can counterpick a gay stage that gives their character an advantage or a neutral stage where they can win since they're better than me anyways. Regardless of which of those two they choose, they will win because they're better. So what is the purpose then of banning non neutrals?
Actually, I would save a lot of money by not going because I'd have to pay for housing, entry fees, gas money, and food. So really, I'm saving a lot of money.[/QUOTE]Yet you don't have any proof at all, which makes my argument better by default.
Fox has a small advantage/no advantage on Pokemon Stadium in every match. That is true to most neutrals...It really has nothing to do with how well I'd place. I think it's ******** to only have neutrals + 4 stages and only one of those 4 stages can be banned with no resets. Some of the neutrals make HUGE differences for characters, why does it matter if counterpick stages do as well?
Consider Pokemon Stadium: Fox has the advantage in ALL of his matchups on Pokemon Stadium except MAYBE vs Falco who also does incredibly well on the stage. You can camp the stage hardcore, you have wall infinites, you can't be chaingrabbed as easily, and it has a low ceiling.
Consider Fountain of Dreams: Now while Stadium might give 2 characters advantages, FoD changes roughly 134988437598 matchups. The moving platforms have a very large impact on pretty much every character.
Nope, that's just an added benefit.So than you aren't going because you don't want to spend money. It isn't because of the stages.
I think you meant also, not alwaysAnd yes, the better player should win the first match, but that isn't always the case. That is why there is such thing as best two out of three, because sometimes you just get unlucky or screw up the first match. (See example above) That is always why they created a losers bracket.
Except the lovely ruleset states that only one of the 4 non neutrals is banable.Fountain of Dreams is probably the least neutral stage, but only for certain matchups. And the characters that have a problem with it just ban it. Its far better than the non-neutrals that tip the scale in many matchups.
I like arguing tooThere's no need to defend your reasoning, I just like arguing.
Mute City <3I guess I'm not really a THP member since I counterpick normal stages XD
good ****. i couldnt make it out although i tied in total points with the guy(beat me 2-1)who did. so close...good **** to eggm and swiftbass. chillin beat pc and chu. hes too goodme and eggm held **** down yesterday and made the 16 man bracket. tunes.......too good