Noipoi
Howdy!
I didn’t mean to cross you. I’ve just been feeling a bit batty.This is your first warning.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I didn’t mean to cross you. I’ve just been feeling a bit batty.This is your first warning.
I mean, in the context of the story, vampires are quite literally evil so... Dracula's not really written to be a character the reader is supposed to relate with, he's a monster, literally.Van Helsing is a nutcase. I swear. 16 chapters into this book and they keep going on about purity and devils and like I know I’m not religious and this book was written in the 19th century and I’ve been raised on “vampires are people too” stories but like god damn it’s really hard to not “both sides” this book pretty hard.
Your puns suck.I didn’t mean to cross you. I’ve just been feeling a bit batty.
You don’t think they’re funny?Your puns suck.
You mean the context of the ravings of Van Helsing and the express actions of one very evil vampire and his minions.I mean, in the context of the story, vampires are quite literally evil so... Dracula's not really written to be a character the reader is supposed to relate with, he's a monster, literally.
It's only later on that vampires were characterized as more than hellspawn bloodsuckers.
Snake, you're reading too deep into things lol.You mean the context of the ravings of Van Helsing and the express actions of one very evil vampire and his minions.
I’m just saying the constant talk of purity and devils is putting me off. Not to mention the constant sexism.Snake, you're reading too deep into things lol.
Our butts were getting absolutely destroyed #NintendoSwitch pic.twitter.com/1E2N55XEQT
— 🦙Ambers #1 Alpaca🦙 (@Jafartomo) September 27, 2021
Again I kinda think you're reading too deep into things but ehI’m just saying the constant talk of purity and devils is putting me off. Not to mention the constant sexism.
Like. I know it’s the era. But For context. I just also listened to King Solomon’s Mines, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, The Invisible Man, and The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. And it’s certainly not as bad in those as it is in Dracula. And it gives Van Helsing the heir of a crooked politician using the actions of one minority crime syndicate to demonize the entire race to a conservatively primed populace he knows will be receptive to it.
WHAT A MARIO KART RIGHT THERE. I HAVE NEVER SEEN THAT BEFORE.There was a problem fetching the tweet**** Waluigi
It’s a book. That’s kind of the point.Again I kinda think you're reading too deep into things but eh
Wow can’t believe shroobs secretly a vampire hunterI mean, in the context of the story, vampires are quite literally evil so... Dracula's not really written to be a character the reader is supposed to relate with, he's a monster, literally.
It's only later on that vampires were characterized as more than hellspawn bloodsuckers.
The name'sWow can’t believe shroobs secretly a vampire hunter
I knew Simon reproduced by sporingThe name's
Belmont
Shroob Belmont
You think people in the 1300s had a sense of hygiene?I knew Simon reproduced by sporing
My name is bondThe name's
Belmont
Shroob Belmont
The name is Deez.My name is bond
Prison bond
yeah…my parents had a weird sense of humor
My name is JoeThe name is Deez.
Deez [hyperlink blocked]
I mean, I know that leather just smells awfulYou think people in the 1300s had a sense of hygiene?
We don’t think about how video game characters are probably sweaty as hell. Doing all that running and jumping.I mean, I know that leather just smells awful
Simon runs aroundWe don’t think about how video game characters are probably sweaty as hell. Doing all that running and jumping.
That’s why I’m making my revolutionary video game “where’s my inhaler bro?” The action platformer where the main character has crippling asthmaWe don’t think about how video game characters are probably sweaty as hell. Doing all that running and jumping.
Vampires were strictly religious creatures at the time, not much you can do about it. Van Helsing was being perfectly logical when he talks about the inherent evilness of the vampires because it's true. Still, characters still find Lucy's death tragic, showing that the reason the other vampires are considered malicious is that they are conscious of their actions.I’m just saying the constant talk of purity and devils is putting me off. Not to mention the constant sexism.
Like. I know it’s the era. But For context. I just also listened to King Solomon’s Mines, 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea, The Invisible Man, and The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. And it’s certainly not as bad in those as it is in Dracula. And it gives Van Helsing the heir of a crooked politician using the actions of one minority crime syndicate to demonize the entire race to a conservatively primed populace he knows will be receptive to it.
Maybe be cautious about Verne's other books. Like, I loved Off on a Comet as a kid but looking back, it's one of the most anti-semitic books I've ever read.20,000 Leagues Under the Sea,
I definitely agree. There’s just only so much of men assuming women are fragile I can take, regardless of how she actually acts in the face of it.Vampires were strictly religious creatures at the time, not much you can do about it. Van Helsing was being perfectly logical when he talks about the inherent evilness of the vampires because it's true. Still, characters still find Lucy's death tragic, showing that the reason the other vampires are considered malicious is that they are conscious of their actions.
As for sexism, I'd say Dracula is pretty fair for its day. Mina is presented as a pretty rational and intelligent character that only gets left behind because the men in the book incorrectly assume she's too fragile.
Also,
Maybe be cautious about Verne's other books. Like, I loved Off on a Comet as a kid but looking back, it's one of the most anti-semitic books I've ever read.
I mean, aren't you kinda applying modern interpretations of a concept to basically its first ever outing? You kinda have to divorce what you know when you read something that's basically the grandfather of the concept.I definitely agree. There’s just only so much of men assuming women are fragile I can take, regardless of how she actually acts in the face of it.
And as for Helsing. I just kind of want to see how he’d react if he’d met a vampire who only drank from animals and also how many of those superstitions he’s proffering are just stereotypes (like. If he can’t cross running water then how did he cross the ocean on that boat? I’m surprised the dirt thing was real).
There’s just certain unavoidable contexts I’m going into this book with that are affecting how I interpret the narrative…. I think that’s part of being human. You might be able to guess one of those context just by association of the five books I’ve already named.
And I didn’t plan to read any of Verne’s other books. Most of my ventures into old literature will be coming from H. Rider Haggard, HG Wells, and a few other scattered authors.
Wow this is the exact same argument I got when I played Mario 64. And I find it equally bull. But I will say Dracula is still an enjoyable book. Especially since books lead themselves so well to interpretation.I mean, aren't you kinda applying modern interpretations of a concept to basically its first ever outing? You kinda have to divorce what you know when you read something that's basically the grandfather of the concept.
I mean, you're trying to say that "Well not all vampires are bad" because of a modern interpretation of them.Wow this is the exact same argument I got when I played Mario 64. And I find it equally bull.
Well, yknow.Wow this is the exact same argument I got when I played Mario 64. And I find it equally bull. But I will say Dracula is still an enjoyable book. Especially since books lead themselves so well to interpretation.
I think people tend to forget this but Dracula was actually supposed to deconstruction of the gothic horror genre when it was first published. It's just hard to appreciate how innovative the book was after over a century and with it being one of the few survivors of its genre.I mean, aren't you kinda applying modern interpretations of a concept to basically its first ever outing? You kinda have to divorce what you know when you read something that's basically the grandfather of the concept.
I feel like I’m talking to stones here. Should not our interpretations and opinions of literature change and grow, as humanity changes and grows and the world changes and grows around it?Well, yknow.
The idea of a not so bad vampire is an exploration of the original concept.
The concept introduced in this book. The first of its kind. Not to mention it was kinda 200 years ago.
Well I am a blockhead.I feel like I’m talking to stones here.