This is possibly the most ******** argument I've ever seen. It's only $4.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Money runs the world, Tery.
This is possibly the most ******** argument I've ever seen. It's only $4.
Money should jump off a building and break its metaphorical ****ing head open. Sorry for how offensive that probably comes off, but I really hate the stuff. I personally find its existence to be living, breathing proof that the philosophy of humanitarianism is complete bull****; despite how much I wish it were otherwise.Money runs the world, Tery.
It's the black shadowy snares entangled across the globe.
I second this notion.
The Disco Room is awesome.
Money, or the concept of money?Money should jump off a building and break its metaphorical ****ing head open. Sorry for how offensive that probably comes off, but I really hate the stuff. I personally find its existence to be living, breathing proof that the philosophy of humanitarianism is complete bull****; despite how much I wish it were otherwise.
And watching Fight Club right before viewing this thread didn't help enlighten my opinion on that at all.
Concept of money, as trade is proof of greed.Money, or the concept of money?
If it were destroyed, we'd have to pay for our Wiis with chickens.
Sounds like you'd like the concept of communism. (not a bad thing)
It means you're not materialistic. I'm quite the same, but I'm not for communism because I know not everyone will "do their part"Concept of money, as trade is proof of greed.
I could drop almost all electronics out of my life and I can guarantee that after a month or two I wouldn't really miss any of it.
I approve of communism more than I approve of capitalism.
You're not lucky. One day if your life hits the crapper, or all of ours does, you'll be one of the people who struggles to adapt. I guess you can say you're lucky, but in reality you're more sheltered than anything.When I read that I realized how much of a lucky ****er I am for being in the upper-middle class.
My biggest wish is to hit rock bottom (or at least get close to it), so at least from my perspective you're not lucky. You're actually the opposite of what I want in life.When I read that I realized how much of a lucky ****er I am for being in the upper-middle class.
I don't quite get why you would want to do this, could you explain to me why this is your wish?My biggest wish is to hit rock bottom.
how you deal with a problematic situation depends solely on your decisions and resources to find a resolution. since decisions aren't a static variable but resources are, those with more resources entering a dilemma will have a strict tactical advantage over those that do not. I can see no logic supporting a theory that privilege yields inflexibility to adaptation.You're not lucky. One day if your life hits the crapper, or all of ours does, you'll be one of the people who struggles to adapt. I guess you can say you're lucky, but in reality you're more sheltered than anything.
I can't really explain it. It's caused by a number of things.I don't quite get why you would want to do this, could you explain to me why this is your wish?
Now I don't want to hear it because you said this.And something tells me you really wouldn't want to hear it.
Cell phones cause cancer, its a fact now that they've been around long enough for us to get concete data. If you are using a cell phone before the age of 19 I believe it was, you are increasing your chances to develop brain cancer before the age of 30 by 50 percent.So you want to live without technology?
So by technology would you do away with your phone? I mean it IS necessary. See a guy robbing a store or you get hurt and you're GONNA HAVE TO call 911
I thought that was debunked by scientistsCell phones cause cancer, its a fact now that they've been around long enough for us to get concete data. If you are using a cell phone before the age of 19 I believe it was, you are increasing your chances to develop brain cancer before the age of 30 by 50 percent.
even then, if you think a bank robber is going to let you dial 911 and isn't going to confiscate your phone during the robbery before you have a chance too, you're pretty naive.
I refuse to have a cell phone.
I don't really use them much, they're convenient but not something that I'd have to have.Cell phones cause cancer, its a fact now that they've been around long enough for us to get concete data. If you are using a cell phone before the age of 19 I believe it was, you are increasing your chances to develop brain cancer before the age of 30 by 50 percent.
even then, if you think a bank robber is going to let you dial 911 and isn't going to confiscate your phone during the robbery before you have a chance too, you're pretty naive.
I refuse to have a cell phone.
These were actually only the old phones from the 80s-early 90s that did this, simply because they used such primitive technology (by today's standards) that literally emitted radiation because THAT'S ALL WE HAD THAT COULD RUN THE PHONES. Same for Analog TVs, except they had lead built into them to block the radiation, and the old phones didn't.Cell phones cause cancer