brinboy789
Smash Champion
well, i assume if your on smashboards, you probably still play smash...who says he does? Assuming things make an *** out of you and me.
edit: besides smash involves more than one game.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
well, i assume if your on smashboards, you probably still play smash...who says he does? Assuming things make an *** out of you and me.
edit: besides smash involves more than one game.
@edit2: i would say 99% of people who prefer meleeoverbrawl is because of brawls new physics engine. not MK. im pretty sure of that.who says he does? Assuming things make an *** out of you and me.
edit: besides smash involves more than one game.
edit2: there are actually a lot of people who prefer to go to melee tournaments than brawl. It isn't only because of MK but he is a factor in it.
A lot of people who are on smashboards don't play smash and like I said smash includes melee and n 64.well, i assume if your on smashboards, you probably still play smash...
if he played melee or 64 he wouldnt be a major part of this heated discussion...how about thisA lot of people who are on smashboards don't play smash and like I said smash includes melee and n 64.
i believe the question you meant to ask was...people arent going to quit smash because MK isnt banned. if thats true, then how come you still play smash?
yes just laugh at people quiting brawl because of MK. laugh at our point being proven. laugh at the possibility of people having played brawl before and quit because of various factors including MK.if he played melee or 64 he wouldnt be a major part of this heated discussion...how about this
da K.I.D., DO YOU PLAY BRAWL?
if he doesnt, then im gonna laugh because he wasted 5 million posts about trying to ban a character in a game that he doesnt even play
uh...no i didnt ask why you dont play MK. im saying that if people are quitting smash because MK isnt banned, then why are you playing it? because you are obviously with the MK bandonti believe the question you meant to ask was...
Why dont I play Meta Knight?
the answer...
the honest answer...
Honestly, because Im not smart.
seriously going into a tourney and not playing MK and expecting to win, is stupid and is like repeatedly slamming your head into a brick wall. its stupid and the only thing youll do is hurt yourself.
To be honest, when i started going to tournaments, i mained Sonic only. The people i play with, know for a fact that I reference Sonic as the only reason that I play brawl over Melee. now, ive had to put the time into learning, Lucario,fox, wolf, pit, and D3 in the desperate search to find something that could defeat MK and snake.
i tried as hard as i could, i still am, im scouring this game to find something, anything that could be used in this game to even hope to combat the rediculousness that is MK. and when absolutely nothing comes up, the only responce that i get is that im too much of a scrub, and that I need to get better. really? I love how only Mk player tell me that. So yall can get off your high horse and slow your effing roll, just because people switch to MK doesnt mean they are whores. it means they are smart. OS and many other figured it out that theres no nobility in smash and that when it comes down to the decision, being "just another MK" and getting the money is better than being that one guy who can beat MKs and having to work your fingers to the bone just to get half the money that youd get playing MK
get real and l2play
tl;dr
i play brawl dispite MKs *********** because
1. I love sonic too much
2. I am too stupid to play MK myself
dont call people ******** when you dont even know what im talking about.yes just laugh at people quiting brawl because of MK. laugh at our point being proven. laugh at the possibility of people having played brawl before and quit because of various factors including MK.
Are you really that ********?
this tooI'm playing Smash since MK MIGHT be Banned or even better, Shadom Moses unbanned
Thus, we aren't quite out of hope until SBR goes and says,"There is no way we're ever banning MK. Ever."
Then we might.
how can I confuse what you said? you said you would laugh at da kid because he doesn't play brawl.dont call people ******** when you dont even know what im talking about.
They already have.people arent going to quit smash because MK isnt banned.
Banning MK will obviously change the characters people will decide to play. How would that be surprising? What possible results would tell you "the ban was successful" vs. "the ban was a bad idea"? "Seeing how much it upsets people" sounds really dumb. Decide what the correct course of action is, and go with it. Surely we can pick more objective criteria for a ban than "which option makes less people upset"; even if we could measure such a thing (we can't).See if it ruins people's ability to compete.
See if it changes who people counterpick.
See if new characters show up in the top slots that were being entirely suppressed before.
See how much it upsets people.
Aren't you ignoring Azen's own statement here, about how he usually does better with Lucario vs. MKs? And he made it to third place with Lucario, how the heck can that indicate "go MK or lose"? You used the term "proves the point" where you should have said "provides a morsel of evidence", and you'd still be overstating the significance of those two matches.Yes Azen would have made it to 3rd with lucario but he can't go any higher which actually proves the point of go MK or loose.
Azen had to go MK in doubles as well because lucario/MK team was getting owned.
Or maybe we'd just have to restructure our tier list; since they're based on tourney results anyway, which will obviously change when you remove a character.if there is anyone below the upper half of high tier that gets top 8 we will know that the game is better without MK
Only because they're neglecting the truth, which is that the results were anywhere betweenat HOBO 11 if you look at the top 8 all people saw was
MK
MK
MK
not MK
not MK
MK
not MK
MK
You asked, I provided some possibilities.Banning MK will obviously change the characters people will decide to play. How would that be surprising? What possible results would tell you "the ban was successful" vs. "the ban was a bad idea"? "Seeing how much it upsets people" sounds really dumb. Decide what the correct course of action is, and go with it. Surely we can pick more objective criteria for a ban than "which option makes less people upset"; even if we could measure such a thing (we can't).
this last thing is a matter of opinion to me it doesn't look diverse enough on the left side. Plus you could use a character your really good at for the 1st half of the tournament and then have to go MK at the end which would still fall under the go MK or loose even if you used a second during the tournament.Aren't you ignoring Azen's own statement here, about how he usually does better with Lucario vs. MKs? And he made it to third place with Lucario, how the heck can that indicate "go MK or lose"? You used the term "proves the point" where you should have said "provides a morsel of evidence", and you'd still be overstating the significance of those two matches.
I'm kind of ignoring it because it doesn't change anything. Snakes used to own MKs now they don't he used to do better against MKs with lucarios now he doesn't. There is one MK he couldn't beat with lucario and was forced to ditto whats to stop there from being more given time? I agree that I should have said it provides evidence instead though.
Doubles play is categorically different; doing well in doubles cannot be used as a condition for banning a character in singles. Maybe the Lucario/MK combination just isn't as effective as other possible pairings?
its true its a different category but if MK is banned will he be allowed in teams? If he is banned it affects it too. And atm doubles also involved go MK or loose.
Or maybe we'd just have to restructure our tier list; since they're based on tourney results anyway, which will obviously change when you remove a character.
I'm not sure what this means tier lists are being reconstructed all the time anyways.
Only because they're neglecting the truth, which is that the results were anywhere between
MKMK----------------
MKLucario----------------
MKMK----------------
WarioWario-------------
MKand--------Snake----
MarthMarth-------------
PeachPeach-------------
MKG&W----------------
BOTH sides of which look diverse enough that if these are typical results, then a ban is not required.
We don't want to quit yet thats probably why. Melee tournaments are more scarce than brawl.As far as I know, the people who want MK banned haven't all quit, else why would we be arguing about this, right here, right now? =/ Sigh.
Maybe he's worried what will happen when we track him downbboy, you still havent told me where the hell you are from
Fair enough. I even agree, about the "health of the community" thing; I mean, why even ban Akuma, since Akuma dittos are fair? Because that's a dumb, shallow game. Same thing if Brawl totally degenerates to MK dittos.You asked, I provided some possibilities.
Whether you want to recognize it or not, the only reason to consider banning a character is for the health of the tournament community. Thus people being upset at the actual events does actually impact it -- if the game will limp on with him unbanned but be dead if he's banned, then he's better off not banned even if all we get are MK dittos.
REALLY?Only because they're neglecting the truth, which is that the results were anywhere between
MKMK----------------
MKLucario----------------
MKMK----------------
WarioWario-------------
MKand--------Snake----
MarthMarth-------------
PeachPeach-------------
MKG&W----------------
BOTH sides of which look diverse enough that if these are typical results, then a ban is not required.
This isn't really happening idk why people keep saying it. There are plenty of people loyal to there favorite characters. Most people who pick up MK is because they have no other way to deal with him not because he is easy to learn.However, it depends why it degenerates. If everyone plays MK just because he's easy to learn whereas the other characters require more time and energy to reach the same skill level, well then that just means our community is lame. The other characters are viable, but noone's bothering to play them. As if we're bored of the game without even giving it a chance.
One thing to bear in mind (And your comment is really interestingly worded, I hadn't really thought about it this way before) -- Brawl is not a technically complex game compared to many fighting games. It's quite possible people are just plain bored of going through all the motions they'd have to in order to compete with MK with anyone except MK, so they'll switch to him or just quit instead. So even if he's not ban worthy by the standards of other games, the boredom effect may make it necessary to ban him in this one.However, it depends why it degenerates. If everyone plays MK just because he's easy to learn whereas the other characters require more time and energy to reach the same skill level, well then that just means our community is lame. The other characters are viable, but noone's bothering to play them. As if we're bored of the game without even giving it a chance.
lulzI would MUCH rather play a Snake as a Pika main then a Meta Knight. MK should be banned, Snake is the marth of melee.
i said if he participated so much in this arguement and doesnt even play the game...it just doesnt work. i never asked any question stop being gay toward mehow can I confuse what you said? you said you would laugh at da kid because he doesn't play brawl.
God forbid someone played it in these 8 months and quit recently.
Also most of your questions are answered in previous posts if you bothered to read them all you wouldn't have to keep asking the same questions over and over.
I tried that. I was up against a very good Rob player in the pools of a tourney. I main Olimar. Seeing that this was a bad matchup, I used Marth instead. (a character that I've got decent experience using) I lost the first match by a one stock I think. I barely lost the second, losing to a dumb recovery mistake I made. (no johns. he beat me fair and square)I've seen a lot of players bring out MK after they lose their first game with their normal main... it's pretty ****ing sad.
you bring it on yourself with your own ignorancei said if he participated so much in this arguement and doesnt even play the game...it just doesnt work. i never asked any question stop being gay toward me
EL hardly goes to tournaments would you laugh at him for being a heated discussion involving them?i said if he participated so much in this arguement and doesnt even play the game...it just doesnt work. i never asked any question stop being gay toward me
I didn't. I said scrubs in Texas would ban him, because the people banning characters are scrubs, and happen to be in Texas. If you want to extrapolate beyond that, go ahead, but don't blame me.where do you get off at calling everyone in texas a scrub?