You haven't stated what you believe yet everyone of your arguments is pro-ban. I ignore your Akuma/ any other anology to bans you bring up because they're irrelevant. This isn't SF it's smash. It's a different game and shouldn't be compared. In Atlantic North MK is not dominating at all.I've also seen plenty of tournaments from other regions where MK wasn't top.
That is pure idiocy on your point.
The requirements for a ban are the extremely similar to those in ALL types of game genre including card games.
banning of Akuma: Overcentralizing/stagnation of metagame.
Banning of ravager: overcentralizing/stagnation of metagame.
Banning of Red eyes darkness metal dragon= would cause overcentralizing.stagnation of metagame.
The analogies are valid. Saying that one game is not comparable purely on gameplay is crap especially considering that the ban criteria that we are using is VERY similar to those that caused Akuma to be banned.
Now respond to the argument rather than coming up with poor reasons to ignore it.
You say that top players know the match ups therefore they can beat MK...otherwise it's...impossible?
Where did I say this?
Do you even bother reading what I have stated.
Stop assuming my argument for me kthxbai.
Go back to my last post. Read the analogy(since you obviously have not otherwise you would not make such a reply) and THEN respond. otherwise, you're just straw mannin and its wasting my time.
Also if you think he dominates more than Marth your nuts.
Marth dominated 34% national tournament wise.
MK dominates 33% national tournament wise.
MK dominates 33% with 2 less tournaments.
He also takes up 2 to 3 more spots than marth does nationally wise.
If you are going to respond read my posts since it is obvious you're just ignoring several parts such as the reasoning.
EDIT- I agree with Inui on this. 60/40 Snake sounds right to me. Also Snake can grab MK out of his tornado, as well as grenade it. Snake's d/f/utilts all out range MK to my knowledge. Not to mention MK is light and Snake hits like a ****ing train. As with anyone else against MK, you need to change your playstyle a bit, but that's adaptation. That's whatbeing a smart/good player is.
ITT: Antiban slap people with smelly fish and tell the antiban people to get better. Totally something we should do in an argument that assumes high level play.
MK outranges all of Snake's moves on the ground with his Dtilt,.
The only move that can compare in range to MK's Dtilt is Snake's second opart of the Ftilt.
That aprt comes out on frame 18.
MK's Dtilt is 15 frames.
this means that when MK spaces properly he can not only outrange Snake's first part of the Ftilt, he can hit Snake before the 2nd Ftilt can connect.
He can also break the grenades with his Ftilt.
The tornado isn't a big deal and if the MK is stupid enough to use it while you hold a grenade or to use the tornado far away that you can prepare for a grab, then clearly they are being stupid.
A good Mk will space Snake and ensure that no matter how Snake reacts on the ground, Snake would be unable to react safely.
MK wouldn't be capable of breaking through Snake's defense easily.
As I said earlier I am int he "its too early to decide" crowd.
Snake doesn't have the ability to break through MK's offense easily.
MK doesn't hit as hard as Snake, but he can gimp, fight aerially, juggle Snake.
I can care less if you think I am pro ban. Fact of the matter is that I am not.
If it does seem that way, its because there are days where the anti ban side just reasons poorly.
MK's Dtilte xtends past its graphics enough to outrange Snake's ground moves and pop grenades without hassle.