So, finding out exploits of the game's physics, fiddling around with hacking Brawl, and figuring out how Brawl's physics work. People need to know this in order to have a good understanding of Brawl's metagame?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
But compared to the amount of characters, young link gets an F and toon link gets a High Dhaha wow, i was looking at this tier list and the ssbm one...
and i realized that toon/young link have the same position at #17 on both of them. craaaazy
Actually, figuring out how things work and why they work is only the most logical way of advancing the metagame.So, finding out exploits of the game's physics, fiddling around with hacking Brawl, and figuring out how Brawl's physics work. People need to know this in order to have a good understanding of Brawl's metagame?
The people in the SBR are supposed to be the "best and brightest." In my opinion, if someone is going to find some kind of game - changing information, it will be our best and brightest people. It is my belief that if the best and brightest members of the community work on solving the mysteries of the game and work to provide the community with new knowledge, that the metagame will develop even faster. If we always just leave it up to the general population, then we will require much more time. Also, in the smash back room, they won't be sifting through "Advanced Techs" that noobs find that aren't really ATs at all or through ATs that have already been discovered (which I know that I am personally guilty of having done on several occassions). I feel that rather than make a controversial tier list this early in the game, the SBR could be more productively helping the community.I don't see how any of that has to do with being the responsibility of the SBR.
That's what I mean. A Smash Lab shouldn't be necessary. SamuraiPanda wanted applicants to the Smash Lab to come up with a reason why Dedede's chain grab goes stale on certain characters (if I remember correctly). But, if the SBR is where our "best and brightest" Dedede players are, then wouldn't it only make sense that those people , being the best and brightest, would be much quicker at figuring that out? A Smash Lab basically would be composed of the same people that SBR would be composed of.Also note that Finding stuff out about the game isn't left up to the general public to be slow about it. What you're describing the SBR should do is EXACTLY what the Smash Lab does.
Pretty sure I've done it with A.This may have already been found, I haven't really researched it, but I was wondering why only down c-stick can result in snakedashing, etc.
Pikachu's QA gives him a couple of aerial frames to do it after the bounce. Fox is put in the helpless state. Just the way it was programmed. Although MK's cape has a similar property hence the IDC.Why can Pikachu do his quick attack cancel? Shouldn't other characters be able to do something similar? Why can't Fox run his firefox into the ground and still jump out of it before actually landing? Why does this only work for Pikachu? There are many mysteries that could lead to even more discoveries if we can explain them better.
QFT, the smash research community looks like its going to be more of a public resource, which will be very helpful.Also note that Finding stuff out about the game isn't left up to the general public to be slow about it. What you're describing the SBR should do is EXACTLY what the Smash Lab does.
Those were just examples as to what I meant. I wasn't sure if they were found yet or not, but I think you get the point I was trying to make.Pretty sure I've done it with A.
Pikachu's QA gives him a couple of aerial frames to do it after the bounce. Fox is put in the helpless state. Just the way it was programmed. Although MK's cape has a similar property hence the IDC.
I MIGHT be wrong but I'm pretty sure that's just how it goes.
The SBR is comprised of the best and brightest Metagamers of the game. The smash lab consists of the best and brightest researchers of the game. There is no need for those to groups of people to be the same. While yes, they sometimes are, they aren't always, but do separate things because that's what each group is best at. The SBR does stuff like tier lists, the Smash Lab does stuff like research. Those two things aren't the same.That's what I mean. A Smash Lab shouldn't be necessary. SamuraiPanda wanted applicants to the Smash Lab to come up with a reason why Dedede's chain grab goes stale on certain characters (if I remember correctly). But, if the SBR is where our "best and brightest" Dedede players are, then wouldn't it only make sense that those people , being the best and brightest, would be much quicker at figuring that out? A Smash Lab basically would be composed of the same people that SBR would be composed of.
When Pikachu's QA hits the ground it pops up a bit. From there you can do an aerial, do another QA, land and do anything, and so forth. That's just the way it was programmed and now it is being abused.Those were just examples as to what I meant. I wasn't sure if they were found yet or not, but I think you get the point I was trying to make.
But, since we are on the topic, what bounce are you referring to with Pikachu's QA? I assume you don't mean frames after the QA is over, because that would mean he can cancel it even without hitting the ground, so I'm a little confused what part you are referring to.
It's quite the opposite.I don't want to see a tierlist that hurts a certain character's potential metagame simply because it was made based on our opinions from very early in Brawl's lifespan.
No... It's more indepth than that. Lucas has horrible matchup, he CANNOT deal with the top/high tiers. Has difficulty with the mid tiers AND low tiers.Excuse my scrubby question since I only come on here once in a while but...
What makes Ness better than Lucas? Is there a simple point to it? Because personally, I like Lucas' A moves much better as well as PK Thunder. I see a lot of people saying Ness should be better than Lucas but I just can not see why. I used to main Ness in melee and abandoned him after playing Lucas in Brawl.
so you seriously think that bowser is better than fox?? wowAhead of time, I'm going to say that Rogu and Ham have no idea what they're talking about. o_O
Bowser doesn't get auto-gayed by three different characters (he does by one, though). Snake isn't "barely even good." You seriously think you're at a point where you can accurately gauge everyone? Wow.so you seriously think that bowser is better than fox?? wow
Chances are you have no idea how Bowser plays.so you seriously think that bowser is better than fox?? wow
Yes. He is. I use Fox as a secondary, so don't say I hate Fox. Bowser has many things over Fox. He doesn't get infinited/locked to either death or extremely high percents except by DDD&ICs. His grab release is crazy. His attacks come out fast and have extremely good KB [Jab, Forward Tilt, Down Tilt], he has a good OOS game with Fortress. There's probably more, but I don't play a lot of Bowser.so you seriously think that bowser is better than fox?? wow
wow, sorry smash isnt my whole life and i dont play this game 24/7Bowser doesn't get auto-gayed by three different characters (he does by one, though). Snake isn't "barely even good." You seriously think you're at a point where you can accurately gauge everyone? Wow.
In that case stop trying to prove points that you know nothing about.wow, sorry smash isnt my whole life and i dont play this game 24/7
So what you're saying is, you entered a thread that involved numerous arguments about an in-depth topic, made a post that reflected your own personal opinion, and upon being provided with evidence that disproves the implication made by your statement, you retort by further implying that you don't have enough experience with the game to know what the hell you're talking about?wow, sorry smash isnt my whole life and i dont play this game 24/7
.........................hi -.-why do people say gandorf can kick falcons a** when they that falcon is awesome
Ness also gets thoroughly buttsexed by marth to the point where he's just as shafted as lucas in high tier matchups as well.No... It's more indepth than that. Lucas has horrible matchup, he CANNOT deal with the top/high tiers. Has difficulty with the mid tiers AND low tiers.
He's moveset is bland at best. He's supposed to be balanced at ground and aerial moves, but Sakurai failed at that. Badly. Excluding that, no one plays him so he has horrible tourney results too.
Yes. Bowser gets ***** by DDD. Fox gets almost as ***** by Sheik, Pikachu, ZSS, MK, and ICs. That's pretty bad.so you seriously think that bowser is better than fox?? wow
Plain and simple: if you know you don't know what you are talking about, please don't claim that other people (who do know what they are talking about) are wrong about something. Uninformed posting is one of the dumbest things you can do, especially if you know that you don't know **** about the topic.wow, sorry smash isnt my whole life and i dont play this game 24/7
Fox can Forward b to sacrifice himself when he has a percentage advantage too... you must not be doing it close enough to the edge.Also, Bowser, unlike Fox, can use his forward b to sacrifice himself when he has a percentage advantage.
LMAO! I love you.Fox can Forward b to sacrifice himself when he has a percentage advantage too... you must not be doing it close enough to the edge.
what??other list was less confusing.