GhostAnime
Smash Ace
Mario games do have a variety but you said that comment about Mega Man as if a game can't have the same storyline and still be fun.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Why are you reposting something I was responding to?
well name 1 game that most ppl find fun that had the same formula, fighting games dont count.Mario games do have a variety but you said that comment about Mega Man as if a game can't have the same storyline and still be fun.
No...that's what you said.Obviously, he didn't see what I posted because you replaced it with "..."
Anyway, what you are saying is idiotic. If Geno was truly 3rd Party then the creator of SMRPG couldn't just "put him in because he wants to". If you are going by that logic then you are saying if Sakurai wants to put him in then he can thus meaning he isn't 3rd Party.
no no. I'm talking about storyline. =p 'formula' was just pretty vague in your first post.well name 1 game that most ppl find fun that had the same formula, fighting games dont count.
Perhaps, Konami has a very great rep, but Kojima did approach Nintendo first. So Konami made the effort. SEGA is everyone's *****, so they're probably good with everything and at most, flattered that Sonic and Mario get to duke it out. Sonic's appearance would be an big asset to Sega in oder to gain more rep from Sonic's inclusion. It's reversed for Square. Square is an asset to Nintendo. They have enough representation in the gaming industry, so they could charge up the nose if they felt like it and get away with highway robbery.Because they probably haven't fallen into this ridiculous fad of prejudicing characters based on whatever they're holding in their hand. Also, is there really any proof that SE would charge so much more compared to what Konami and SEGA already are? I mean, does SE do this often?
Truth be told. Sora, Kairi, Heartless, Ansem, Riku, the original worlds, about everything, other than Final Fantasy characters belongs to Disney.There's no proof whatsoever that anyone other than Disney owns any of the original Kingdom Hearts properties. I agree that Cloud and Sora haven't been in enough Nintendo games, though.
Exactly what I was thinking. Cecil has always been an icon from Square that I totally see to be associated with Nintendo.You find out which is the most popular and/or recent like with Ike. For example, Cecil's game is the most popular of the Nintendo FF's in Japan (based on that Famitsu thing) and the remake is coming out about a month before SSBB which places it in a good advertising situation.
That doesn't contradict anything I said.You are wrong though. Mario and Luigi Superstar Saga was produced by Tetsuo Mizuno and Shigeru Miyamoto . Tetsuo is the founder of AlphaDream which is 2nd Party to Nintendo, which also means that Nintendo could use the power that they have.
Ya, at least three of Nintendo's second parties were founded by former SE employees.AlphaDream does indeed have ties to Square, so it makes sense they could put Geno in as a cameo. Though you have to take into consideration that AlphaDream is owned by Nintendo.
Probably so. Nintendo has been known to throw a few cameos in their games just for fun, such as a few obscure pictures of Mario in The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. Since it was made with Square Enix, M&L:SS was probably an ideal place to stick in a tiny reference to a game many old-school gamers could recognize. Nintendo wasn't hinting at ownership of anything: they just wanted to make the game a little more creative for people who actually knew Geno from SMRPG.And you believed them? Geno probably showed up during that one minigame in M&L because the director, who also directed SMRPG, liked him. He, combined with the fact that the founder of Alpha Dream is a former president of Squaresoft, very likely still has ties within Square-Enix.
Sora would be terribly out of place in Brawl because Nintendo owes nothing to him history-wise. Unlike Geno, who played a large role in a staple game for Nintendo's (and the entire gaming industry's) biggest franchise, Sora made an appearance on one game that really has nothing to do with Nintendo.Because they probably haven't fallen into this ridiculous fad of prejudicing characters based on whatever they're holding in their hand. Also, is there really any proof that SE would charge so much more compared to what Konami and SEGA already are? I mean, does SE do this often?
There's no proof whatsoever that anyone other than Disney owns any of the original Kingdom Hearts properties. I agree that Cloud and Sora haven't been in enough Nintendo games, though.
I haven't got a source except for what I've heard around here, but it's being said that SE doesn't want a FF character in Brawl. Not much I can say about this, since I haven't touched the FF games or heard about them in a long time.You find out which is the most popular and/or recent like with Ike. For example, Cecil's game is the most popular of the Nintendo FF's in Japan (based on that Famitsu thing) and the remake is coming out about a month before SSBB which places it in a good advertising situation.
Although these games have contributed to Nintendo in the past, I'd doubt they'd give it priority over SMRPG. If any of the Dragon Quest characters were owned by Nintendo, I could see them getting in, but as of now the poll and fanbase have given Geno such an advantage over all the other SE characters I can't see Sakurai picking any of them over him....and what about the main series? The legendary hero Loto (aka Erdrick) is considered a video game icon in Japan and, combined with the fact that Dragon Quest is so mind-numbingly popular in Japan, DQ's popularity in the US has to at least match that of SMRPG.
Sakurai has shown interest in Geno by mentioning him several times- I can hardly call that worthless. If Nintendo really wants him in Brawl, they'd pay for him, though nobody can say for how much...Well, how do you know he's not worthless to Nintendo, too? That the return of paying for a popular SE character isn't worth it?
SE owns Geno- that much is clear. However, with them not working on this game and Geno's appearance being much more than a simple cameo, I'm sure Nintendo would have to put much more than a simple statement like that in the credits, assuming they didn't pay for that cameo at all.How do you know how much control Nintendo has over Geno, anyway? The copyright at the end of M&L says that, "regardless" of Nintendo's owning of everything else, SE owns Geno.
Yay fatmanonice is on smashboards O: , Anyhow i'd laugh really hard if geno was revealed twomorrow for the 150th Update yet i would be so happy ( I Doubt it but hopefully we will see a good newcomerBecause as the situation currently stands, third parties are either represented by stages (as the case with Nacmo and the Star Fox Assualt and DK: Jungle Beat Stage), ATs (as the case with Treasure with the AT of the heroine from Sin and Punishment) or characters (Snake and Sonic representing Konami and Sega respectively). In other words, the third parties involved so far are actually involved in significant ways in the game. Also, as I've already explained, Geno's chances of becoming an AT are extremelly low because the Mario franchise already has two, we already have 19 ATs, not all the playable franchises have been revealed yet, there are still 7 playable franchises that don't have at least one AT yet, and there are still plenty of smaller franchises that Nintendo hasn't tapped into yet.
Ack! Is there no way to avoid that AT?Hrm.....got an idea for an AT...
Valentina and Dodo: Valentina appears, calls for Dodo, and Dodo carries away the person with the lowest amount of damage. Ten seconds later, the person comes back with +50 damage.
It reminds me of the first time I played SMRPG....Dodo took Geno when he was at half health... I was playing on a ROM and saved right when the battle had started. It took forever. >_O
Why are we discussing that ? I Mean how are we suppose to even be so sureThe normal. Arguing over what Party Geno really is. Normally, we talk about stuff like extra stages, AT, etc...
Today has been a slow day though.
Well, look at the response Nintendo gave to McFox' e-mail in the first post of this thread.There is no doubt that they will have to pay a small fee no matter what to get Geno in the game, but Geno's ownership is kind of up in the air. Maybe the two companies co-own Geno and they don't even know it?
If you ask SE they will say "Ask Nintendo"
If you ask Nintendo they will say "Ask SE"
It's probably just laziness, but it makes me wonder... Do they really know who owns Geno? Maybe, Nintendo but the full rights to Geno, and they are just saying "Ask SE" as a cover-up because it would give Geno away.
/endsillytheory
I'll get to the second half in a second...And you believed them? Geno probably showed up during that one minigame in M&L because the director, who also directed SMRPG, liked him. He, combined with the fact that the founder of Alpha Dream is a former president of Squaresoft, very likely still has ties within Square-Enix and it was easy for them to get permission.
And it wouldn't be hard for them to get permission now because...? The fact that we now have Sonic shows that the process isn't as nightmarish as we thought it was (at least when both parties agree with the proposal) so I don't see what the big deal here is. If you really want to go with that arguement, Alpha Dream is now a second party to Nintendo so wouldn't the process be just as easy as it was 4 years ago?
Because they probably haven't fallen into this ridiculous fad of prejudicing characters based on whatever they're holding in their hand. Also, is there really any proof that SE would charge so much more compared to what Konami and SEGA already are? I mean, does SE do this often?
Considering how Goroh and Lyn were made into ATs (both of which were very worthy canidiates) it gives strong evidence that it isn't Sakurai's intention to add a ton of sword users this time around. It's called variety, my friend. Regarding the "rental costs" for Geno, what reason would SE have for charging an arm and a leg for him? You talk as if he's racking in millions of dollars for them each year which is obviously not the case. I think for this rebuttal you're just arguing for the sake of arguing...
There's no proof whatsoever that anyone other than Disney owns any of the original Kingdom Hearts properties. I agree that Cloud and Sora haven't been in enough Nintendo games, though.
The copyrights on the title screen of each KH game show how it it's legally divided.
You find out which is the most popular and/or recent like with Ike. For example, Cecil's game is the most popular of the Nintendo FF's in Japan (based on that Famitsu thing) and the remake is coming out about a month before SSBB which places it in a good advertising situation.
Ike's second party though and thus Nintendo doesn't have to pay to use him. There's also the fact that there's a good chance that FE will probably have more then one rep so it's not like all the representation of the franchise is being thrown on the shoulders of a single person. Regarding the advertising spiel, the developers probably decided the final character roster back in September of last year so I don't think they had that much foresight. What about the case for SMRPG for the VC then? IGN revealed that in December and we're basically comparing a game that's already been made to one that was (and apparently still is) in development.
...and what about the main series? The legendary hero Loto (aka Erdrick) is considered a video game icon in Japan and, combined with the fact that Dragon Quest is so mind-numbingly popular in Japan, DQ's popularity in the US has to at least match that of SMRPG.
Keyword words: in Japan. Sakurai said that his focus for most of the characters would be on a global scale. You also have to notice that when it comes to third party characters, Sakurai has been going with the biggest icons in the industry. Heck, if I was directing the game, I'd do the same thing because what would be the point of paying for someone that only one region is really even familar with? As I already mentioned, Geno, despite his legal situation, is exempted from this because no matter how you slice it, he's still a Mario character and unfit to represent Square Enix in its entirety.
Well, how do you know he's not worthless to Nintendo, too? That the return of paying for a popular SE character isn't worth it?
How do you know how much control Nintendo has over Geno, anyway? The copyright at the end of M&L says that, "regardless" of Nintendo's owning of everything else, SE owns Geno.
As I mentioned, Square Enix owns the character while Nintendo owns all the scenarios and story points. Geno played a role in the plot of SMRPG and thus falls into this. With that being said, he can't legally be used outside the context of this story without Nintendo's consent.
You have yet to reply to my pm Fatmanonice >_< E: (One On smashboards , I Sentz youz one :O) And actually i have a question...If the likes of sonic and megaman and so on would be legal nightmares than what makes the fact that sora even through he has good buisness affairs and is very popular a legal nightmare ? And couldn't geno and sora BOTH Be in with Sora repping a third party slot and Geno for the mario series ? Just asking there.I'll get to the second half in a second...
Nsider2 alliance on smashboards lawl...Hi...Great now your going to tell fatmanonice that daisy is moar deserving to run him up a wall-of-textHello people, I'm Ryudo from Nsider, I joined the Geno alliance as you can see from the Wiki page. The Nsider 2 site isn't working for me right now, so I decided to join this site, hello there.
Still they all have good relationship :Looks at ammount of numbers of KH Copies sold and the number of crudy disney games made on nintendo's liscensing: That's saying a lot...Not that i'm saying he is high likely but still he has that <_<.You have to understand that Sora is co-owned by two different companies.
Square-Enix and Disney.
That means that in order for Sora to get in Square-Enix and Disney would have to give equal consent, and both would require a set fee for the use of Sora's character. Unlike Sonic and Megaman who would only need Sega and Capcom's consent.
That is the key difference.
heh....well now that all the Nsider2 Alliance members have moved here, we don't really need 2 factions anymore, do we?Hello people, I'm Ryudo from Nsider, I joined the Geno alliance as you can see from the Wiki page. The Nsider 2 site isn't working for me right now, so I decided to join this site, hello there.
Nay, Sora is owned by Disney.You have to understand that Sora is co-owned by two different companies.
Square-Enix and Disney.
That means that in order for Sora to get in Square-Enix and Disney would have to give equal consent, and both would require a set fee for the use of Sora's character. Unlike Sonic and Megaman who would only need Sega and Capcom's consent.
That is the key difference.
I already beat him <_< (In SMRPG , I Beat that game like a year ago so i don't remember well on it but that was hard.), Anyhow that would be interesting (Probably not a Boss.) Anyhow maybe we will AT LEAST See something like Smithy's castle maybe for a course ? So to make this feel like Nsider2 what do you all think As daisy for a boss in brawl XD XD XD?I kind of wish Culex had a chance of being a boss in Brawl... I imagine he'd be part of an event match and that it would be insanely hard even for the most salty of players. My thought is that Culex and the Four Elemental Crystals' attacks would be various final smashes. The game play footage that we've seen thus far have shown that most of the final smashes can be avoided (even though it can be really difficult to do so) so it'd definately make for an interesting match. For example, the Fire Crystal could have the Mario Finale, the Water Crystal could have whatever the Ice Climber's final smash is, the Earth Crystal could have heavy hitting ones like the Landmaster summon, the Wind Crystal could have Volt Tackle, and Culex could have the ones that are insanely hard to avoid to avoid like Peach Blossom and the Zero Lazer. This idea may sound a little weird but, when you think about, the attacks of those characters in SMRPG basically were the strongest moves in the game.
For more specifics, each crystal would have 200% and Culex would have 500%. In other words, the fight would be similar to how you fight Master/Crazy hand. The player would also be given 4 lives because, obviously, this even would be melt your face off hard. I imagine that there would be a really good reward for winning though like a voucher for one free VC game mailed to your "mailbox" on your Wii.
I know, you guys are probably thinking "O__o' Dear God, is he insane" but I absolutely love challenging boss battles and sometimes those are the sole reason why I buy certain games.
Quoted for freaking truth. As long as Geno gets in, I'm good. I just want all of this to stop; things like arguing with people who think he will not get in, going through all of this stuff, etc. I just hope Geno gets announced tomorrow so then after I freak out of excitement, I can just sit back, chill, and watch the rest of the Brawl updates.I personally don't care who gets into Brawl, as long as Geno does...
After he's announced, their hate will be completely pointless and just serve for people to laugh at...Even when Geno gets updated there will still be haters. The fighting won't stop just like how there are some haters for Sonic still lurking around here.
Though I can see your point
And when geno get's updated we will all be annoying And ask for the next FF Rep...SORA4BRAWL.Even when Geno gets updated there will still be haters. The fighting won't stop just like how there are some haters for Sonic still lurking around here.
Though I can see your point