Z'zgashi
Smash Legend
DK plays the bongos and ***** all their *****
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This wins with out a doubt. DK 2nd.Ganon plays a mean church organ though......
Metaknight da bess lolSo, what do you guys think of MK being alone in the S tier?
^ThisI don't think Snake is different enough to warrant being in a tier of his own...
I really like how the list was segmented this time.I know it's fun and cool and all, but you should really be gettng back on topic. I want something to discuss which I'm well-versed in, and I'm no musician. I know I'm speaking for lots of people here too!
So, what do you guys think of MK being alone in the S tier? And what about reducing the amount of tiers? Should the letter division stay, or would it be better to separate the tierlist in top/high/mid/low/bottom? Any ideas on how another tier list should be made, other than votes from individuals (essentially it's 'each person submits his personal tier list, then we take it all and average out the results for each character and place them in that order')?
I'll be waiting for some replies.![]()
Well it all comes down to this:
If the gap between MK and the rest of the top characters is greater than, say, the gap between the rest of the top characters and high tier then you can't with good conscience place Meta Knight alongside the rest of the top tier characters and simply say he's the best. If you group him with characters who he is clearly superior to (vastly so, in fact) then it gives off the vibe of saying: "Nah, trust us, he's not super good. Look! He's with these other good characters in top tier!"
Yeah, I know that stuff like the back of my hand, believe me... I've done my research. Just take it as a personal question more than a normal one, if you will.mk is in a tier of his own.
BBR has a conscience to not have people thinking their use of an A tier character will be as successful as using MK.
MK being in his own tier was highly agreed on. Minor contention on whether or not snake and diddy would be in their own tier as well or join the rest of the current A tier. I am definitely happier now that those two remained with the rest.
That's using characters who aren't clear on where they belong. MK and Snake are 1 and 2, almost inarguably (some people believe Snake isn't 2 and claim some other character is instead, although it isn't hard to figure out that he's cemented his position as the 2nd best character). Why not just group them in that order, under the name of "best characters" (Diddy and Falco would go up for debate though)? I mean that's what the tier 'list' should be, a 'listing' of the characters from best to worst separated into several tiers... Even though MK might have enough of a reason as to be ahead of snake by a noticeable margin, he's still only 'the best character in the game', while Snake's still 'the second best character in the game'. If the list is supposed to group characters by how much better than the rest of the cast they are, wouldn't it be better to just group MK and Snake (as well as whatever other characters are unarguably 'best characters in the game') in the same tier, which would represent 'best characters in the game'?In this tier list I aimed towards for there to be at least reasonably conscious ability to compare characters within their own tier, in terms of viability.
If I have dedede as first in his tier, and pikachu as second and olimar as third, then who do I think is the best out of those three? It's hard for me to differentiate them, they're all close enough to me personally and also ended up pretty close to it from votes as well.
I wasn't talking about any character whose tier position was nebulous, I was talking about the obvious best characters. And I wasn't observing individual positions, instead I was pointing out why you wouldn't want to organize the tier list in a way that the best characters in the game were in the same tier.It's a tier list.
I've said this numerous times. Not an order list (this is only something that comes as a "result" of the voting). Characters were "ordered" only in the higher tiers and ONLY after their tier separations were created. Exception being MK who was initially tiered with Diddy and Snake early on in voting.
The fact that we have to order people from 1-x is a convention I'm not even in huge favour of, because it causes a ****fest like "ZOMG PIT" occurring.
I'll repeat, my aim for this tier list was to create accurate tiers. Snake is not far ahead enough in people's minds to be above everyone like MK, nor is diddy. Once you remove the tournament results of Ally and ADHD those characters have similar tournament results as the rest of A tier.
A sort-of personal view on why the need for a different kind of tierlist was eventually taken into account. What was the reason you decided to drop the whole high/mid/low formula and stick to letters? Given that in every other fighting game the same tierlist formula is still the high/mid/low one, of course. I'd imagine there was some sort of discussion about this matter... And in the other tier lists, giving a single character his own tier above the rest of the "best characters" generally implied a bannable/banned character was in the game, but in Brawl, the same people responsible for the tierlists don't believe that the one character separated into his own tier is bannable (overall).what response were you actually expecting though? I don't really understand.
"Hello, Politics"but in Brawl, the same people responsible for the tierlists don't believe that the one character separated into his own tier is bannable (overall).
So it's all tangled up to me.