Not sure if this is exactly an "off my chest" sort of thing, but its been on my mind for awhile now so I wanted to throw it out there. Recently, I've been thinking about Sega and how strict they are with the Sonic brand these days: they refuse to acknowledge the Freedom Fighters despite the fanbase literally BEGGING them to make them canon, and just the other day it was revealed that Egmont isn't allowed to reprint Sonic the Comic specifically because Sega doesn't consider it "on brand" (yes really, I read the article). But then that got me thinking... does Nintendo have that problem too? On the one hand, they were perfectly fine with the recent Mario movie having references to Super Show, and I think Mario has even "done the Mario" in a few games. On the other hand, it took them quite awhile to figure out what to do with all the Rare-made DK stuff, and even then there's still quite a bit untouched from what I've gathered if you don't count cameos. Most of the Kongs, almost all the Animal Friends, and it apparently took the Smash Ballot to convince Nintendo to bring back the series' main villain. This is probably just a false equivalency thing (those Rare-made characters are at least video game characters with some degree of input from Nintendo if I remember correctly, and it's not like I see anybody asking for characters like Queen Rotunda or Eddie the Mean Old Yeti to become canon to the Mario games), but like I said this has been on my mind lately. Is this sort of thing just common, or am I overthinking things?