LOL!!!yo guys i just realized
we can't count pound
money was never realllly on the line
![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82c3b/82c3b8cb192efe58ded4435b7dd6d8ccdc05b186" alt="Troll :troll: :troll:"
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
LOL!!!yo guys i just realized
we can't count pound
money was never realllly on the line
![]()
Since what i said completely went over your head (i included Co18 but whatever rofl), im not going to truly respond to this.*Sigh* & *face palm*
Ok lemme break this down 4 you since your missing the importance of what you just said
They both have a losing record to Esam. - Point 4 No1
Seibrik has win over Hrnut who halberd has a losing record to - Point 4 Brik
Seibrik has a win over masky who halberd has a losing record to - Point 4 Brik
Halberd has a win over mampam who Seibrik has a losing record to - Point 4 Red
Seibrik has a win over Afro who Halberd has a losing record - Point 4 Brik
Halberd has defeated Seibrik in the head to head - Point 4 Red
They both have 4 total losing records
O wait.. U forgot
Seibrik has a losing record 2 CO18 - Point 4 Red or removed from Brik
so it's still 3-3 or 4-4
THEY ARE TIED
in a tie-breaker U gotta look at who beat who between the 2
Your basically using Inui Logic (Gotta love Inui <3)
saying that since Seibrik beat 2 ppl Red lost 2 that Seibrik is better
I'm saying that
Seibrik beating 2 ppl Red lost 2(That were VERY ACTIVE PLAYERS) < Red beating Seibrik and Brik losing to a random
No offense to Red...
But I would choose to have Seibrik on my side in a crew battle over Red
But the FACT is that Red BEAT SEIBRIK let alone it was NOT THAT LONG AGO
Red beat Seibrik head 2 head
Red deserves # 2
Lol, ruleset, we didnt use the same ruleset for any 2 tournaments int he last season (i mean we did, but you get the idea). Some tournaments ha dridiculous rulesets and some had ridiculous rulesets that the TO DIDNT EVEN FOLLOW LOL. Just deal with it man.Lol I'm moving down to a set that was agreed between the two players that it wouldn't count a set where two players altered the rules to their liking because they didn't want it to count.
Seibs you guys don't seem to understand...you picking ganon to help dtorr get out of pools was ur decision you sandbagged he picked his character and won, no rules were altered to do this. Did u and dtorr agree before the set that it shouldn't be counted?
Me and mero however completely decided that those matches would be off the record because of how much we altered the ruleset. Two players agreeing on something shouldn't be the equivalent of one player randomly deciding this on his own to sandbag while the other player plays the set seriously to win.
![]()
It should definitely count. Both matches should count, im confused as to why anyone would enter a tournament, then not try, however money is still paid out, and multiple people are entering for the only purpose of doing good. Wtf where was the intelligence in this.I think what Seibrik is trying to say is that if he's willing to take the hit if they count your loss to Mero.
Personally, I, the winner of that match, can personally vouch that it wasn't played seriously. The purpose of our Pound set wasn't for anyone's personal gain other than for me to get into final bracket. No PR nonsense. It shouldn't count for PR. That's how I view it. I don't know about Seibrik.
Your match vs Mero shouldn't count either since you both banned like 33 characters LMAO and you both played it like w/e.
Well Seibrik already 2-0'd everybody in the pool we were in. He was already guaranteed 1st, hence the situation to DELIBERATELY help me out. We would've played our set in a serious manner if otherwise.It should definitely count. Both matches should count, im confused as to why anyone would enter a tournament, then not try, however money is still paid out, and multiple people are entering for the only purpose of doing good. Wtf where was the intelligence in this.
It doesn't matter roflWell Seibrik already 2-0'd everybody in the pool we were in. He was already guaranteed 1st, hence the situation to DELIBERATELY help me out. We would've played our set in a serious manner if otherwise.
what tournaments are you talking about? The ones you are hosting now? Its probably because of the unity ruleset, that doesn't effect last season...And we aren't doing anything to push you down four spots, you are trying to avoid your own just really really terrible decisions rofl. Sorry we are counting every tournament???It should not count, I was literally just told by seibrik from masky today that my tournaments won't count due to my ruleset.
Afro you don't seem to understand how much altering you guys are trying to do to push me down four spots.
We should give gdx his wins for beating everyone at the drunk tourney at gallaxfest as well
![]()
just seems like a stripping of free will from both players in this scenarioEverything counts as long as the tournament rules are standard and there is money on the line. The rules at Otronicon were standard, you just chose not to follow them.
hell man, we dont even decide that rofl, the whole BBR committee thing decided that from now on tournaments wont even be in tournament results (or whatever) unless they use the unity ruleset.So we aren't counting my rules....but we're counting me & mero's rules....hmmm....
Someone please help me make sense of this
Show me where everyone at vipers agreed that a their sets were not legit, show me where everyone was forbidden to play their mains or secondaries, show me where you guys changed damage ratio to 2.0, played on luigi's mansion or 75m...
![]()
It wouldn't be fair if that was possible. For instance what if I (an unranked player) had beaten Seibrik, but the both of us decided to agree it doesn't count so that Seibrik could advance a position on the PRs (over RedHalberd for instance)?just seems like a stripping of free will from both players in this scenario
i mean, if one of the two agrees it should count, then clearly it should. but if both players involved say it shouldn't...then i personally dont see why it should. Its the same as people being allowed to break dave's stupid rule as long as both players agree. You cant just tell the two players they must follow the rule even if they both dont want to (as long as it is not effecting the number of stocks). Just seems alittle over the top to me
But again, thats just how i see it.
anyway, back to egg geoncide /pokemon
lmao I lostIf consistency was the ONLY thing that mattered, then Xaltis would be number 1.
Consistently losing to everyone puts his consistency score above everyone else.
There you have it. Xaltis reading level is comparable to the Hulk.![]()
That's all I got.
That's what I was trying to say.I still think its dumb tho that seibrik has a loss on dtorr considering he used ganondorf... I mean PR's are supposed to try its best to give an accurate representation of rankings. Seibrik can easily beat dtorr with mk, to count the set against him because he was trying to help FL out is ridiculous.