• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

The Most Controversial Thread on the Site! (Originally the Anti-Lucario/Pro Squirtle)

Status
Not open for further replies.

RDK

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,390
Meh....

I hate to agree with Sandman, but I just don't want Lucario in Brawl.

We already have Pika and Trainer. Bring back Jiggs and Mewtwo, and that'll be good.
 

Legolastom

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
5,267
O yhea Yoshi's design and Yoshi's level are from two different games.

Yoshi looks more like his story / Party games self while his level is obviously from Yoshi's island.

And i would accept the_sandman's opinion if his reasons didn't fail so bad.

E.G. Lucario cannot be in because all the PKMN are 1st gen = Meta knight cant be in because he wasn't in the 1st game.

(O yhea and PKMN has no style unlike Zelda or star fox)
 

Stryks

Smash Hero
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,423
Location
Tijuana cabrones!
The other thing is he gives biased opinions:

Bowser jr is a filler in every mario game, but they should add petey...

He said Black knight is generic and shouldnt be added, hes refering to the name and status, then I say what about Pokemon trainer, isnt HE generic? and isnt an evil king (meaning ashnard) a generic role?

He ignores that and then He says they shouldnt add a character without showing facial expressions, meaning no Black knight, then I say what about samus? he ignores it and then says theres too MANY no expressions characters, which are just GAW and samus... how is that too many?

They shouldnt add bowser jr cause a father shouldnt fight his son, then I go: but mario and bowser can team up to take down peach, ganondorf and zelda can join to take down link, and so on, meaning that doesnt matter it smash...

He also goes that the character added will be from a single game, e.x. Zelda characters will only be TP characters... thus WW link cant get it due to his theory, which is BS... BUT he wants diddy even tough he didnt apepar in jungle beat, meaning his just prefering characters, his theory fails and everything he says is bias...

He then says they shouldnt add megaman cause hes blue, so? theres already too many human characters, and were BOUDN to get more....

He says we should add ryu instead, even tough capcom/megaman has more games, was part of the NES era like ryu, continues to appear in nintendo consoles and is the 2nd most wanted 3rd party, but STILL wants Ryu...

THEN he says they should add Ryu cause there isnt a REAL ninja, I say we dont have ONE FULL ROBOT in the game, but u want ANOTHER ninja?

He then says brawl will be diferent from melee, saying theyre wont be clones, yet says bowser jr would be to identical to bowser and krystal if he has the paintbrush, not only does he fails because what he said in the 1st place, but since he wants another ninja, hes going against his OWN words of brawl being diferent...

Sandman fails...
 

susu_atari

Smash Ace
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
854
Location
Leeds, UK
I really can't agree with any of this guys reasons. His main theory (you know, the 'from one game' theory) is actually, so far ONLY applicable to Zelda. His reason is basically 'I have an unfounded opinion'. Ridiculous.

Also, in the defence of Bowser Jr., he has had more screen time in both Mario Sunshine and New Super Mario Bros. than Bowser has, and he could have a unique moveset.
 

Legolastom

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
5,267
Since when could you shoot fireballs and cause earthquakes out of a paint brush?

And since when could you create er... evil glop (And such other monstrosity's) out of a dinosaur staff?

Actually no its called The "Most Controversial Thread on the Site! (Originally the Anti-Lucario/Pro Squirtle)"
 

Stryks

Smash Hero
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,423
Location
Tijuana cabrones!
You see how hes not repliying? Hes just waiting for the next page to appear and make sure everyone forgot about it... like the multiple times I mentioned he was wrong about black knight...
 

RDK

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
6,390
Gohma more important than Vaati, lol.

Isn't Petey supposed to be a playable character in both Strikers Charged and the new Mario Kart? He's also been in the past few Mario Sports games (Baseball, Strikers, etc.). It seems Nintendo is trying to get a cult following started for him.

Don't put him in Brawl, though.
 

Legolastom

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 29, 2006
Messages
5,267
Petey is like Waluigi... except much more important BUT he isn't as important as Bowser JR and yes he is in those games... and so is Bowser JR XD

But id say that Dry bones is just a little less likely as Petey... : P
 

Stryks

Smash Hero
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,423
Location
Tijuana cabrones!
Also Sandman, just because they were in a past fighting game it doesnt mean they wont be in smash, Link was in SC2 was he not?

and Snake was in a fighting game WAY before he was announced in brawl, and sonic as well, he was in other fighting games... you fail... again...
 

DarkKry4

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
517
Meh....

I hate to agree with Sandman, but I just don't want Lucario in Brawl.

We already have Pika and Trainer. Bring back Jiggs or Mewtwo, and that'll be good.
I agree too! Lucario's design and fans alone makes me not want him in brawl. What kind of a pokemon has dreadlocks? The kind that wont be in Brawl thats for sure.

If he were to replace Jiggs or Mewtwo. Why take out Jiggs or Mewtwo for him? I do hope they return. Plus there are much better pokemon like munchlax. Maybe even WigglyTuff(even though its not gonna happen).
 

Circus

Rhymes with Jerkus
BRoomer
Joined
Jul 9, 2007
Messages
5,164
I agree too! Lucario's design and fans alone makes me not want him in brawl. What kind of a pokemon has dreadlocks? The kind that wont be in Brawl thats for sure.
Okay, I understand not liking his design (I hate Deoxys' design, which is why I'm glad he's not in), but I've never understood this thing about the fans. Not all fans are created equal—some are obsessive and annoying, but some are just supportive. Why would anyone hold a character's fanbase against it? It's not Lucario's fault that he attracts some immature fans.
 

Pluvia's other account

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
3,174
Location
No Internet?!?
I agree too! Lucario's design and fans alone makes me not want him in brawl. What kind of a pokemon has dreadlocks? The kind that wont be in Brawl thats for sure.

If he were to replace Jiggs or Mewtwo. Why take out Jiggs or Mewtwo for him? I do hope they return. Plus there are much better pokemon like munchlax. Maybe even WigglyTuff(even though its not gonna happen).
Cause he has "dreadlocks" (which he doesn't) you don't think he'll appear? That's a truely awful excuse.

And why would they take out Jiggs or Mewtwo for him? They will have about 6 Pokemon characters, I think that's pretty safe to asume.

EDIT:

100 Posts!!
 
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
859
Location
San Diego, CA (in Yo Mama's house!) PM ME IF U WAN
I agree too! Lucario's design and fans alone makes me not want him in brawl. What kind of a pokemon has dreadlocks? The kind that wont be in Brawl thats for sure.

If he were to replace Jiggs or Mewtwo. Why take out Jiggs or Mewtwo for him? I do hope they return. Plus there are much better pokemon like munchlax. Maybe even WigglyTuff(even though its not gonna happen).
it really annoys me when people say some characters shouldnt be in Brawl cuz of how they look. geez its like the people about Marth ("i dont want that dude chick in Brawl, cuz i hate getting my a** tipped")...seriously.
n who said Lucario were to replace Jiggs and Mew2? ive only heard of the Mew2 one, but never Jiggs.
 

McFox

Spread the Love
BRoomer
Joined
Sep 9, 2001
Messages
18,783
Location
Visiting from above.
The original post said:
Ryu has been proven to NOT appear in Brawl!

Why you ask? Well someone told me that he has already been in a fighting game! If he was already part of another fighting game, then he won't be needed for Brawl. No point in adding him if another game can represent him right?
Solid Snake has already been in a fighting game.

Someone has probably already mentioned this, I'm just throwing it out there in case they haven't.

*EDIT* Not that I'm in support of Ryu appearing in Brawl, because that would be stupid.

I'm just saying.
 

Kirby knight

Smash Lord
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
1,479
Location
Pennsylvania
I agree too! Lucario's design and fans alone makes me not want him in brawl. What kind of a pokemon has dreadlocks? The kind that wont be in Brawl thats for sure.

If he were to replace Jiggs or Mewtwo. Why take out Jiggs or Mewtwo for him? I do hope they return. Plus there are much better pokemon like munchlax. Maybe even WigglyTuff(even though its not gonna happen).
I mentioned this before but I'll say it again. At this time Lucario is one of the most popular pokemon of the D/P generation. At the time of SSB Jigglypuff was put into the game because it was one of the most popular pokemon of the RBY generation. In my opinion since Lucario falls under the same requirements that Jigglypuff he'd be great to be included in SSBB. Of course that's not without saying that he doesn't have some competition from likes of Munchlax, however I think Lucario has an edge over Munchlax because he had a feature flim based around him.

Disliking a pokemon because of his fanbase reminds of people dislike Cloud from FF7 just because he's popular( I'm in no way saying Cloud should be in Brawl); it's really unwarranted and kind of childish. Not every fan of Lucario is annoying.
 

DarkKry4

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
517
I mentioned this before but I'll say it again. At this time Lucario is one of the most popular pokemon of the D/P generation. At the time of SSB Jigglypuff was put into the game because it was one of the most popular pokemon of the RBY generation. In my opinion since Lucario falls under the same requirements that Jigglypuff he'd be great to be included in SSBB. Of course that's not without saying that he doesn't have some competition from likes of Munchlax, however I think Lucario has an edge over Munchlax because he had a feature flim based around him.

Disliking a pokemon because of his fanbase reminds of people dislike Cloud from FF7 just because he's popular( I'm in no way saying Cloud should be in Brawl); it's really unwarranted and kind of childish. Not every fan of Lucario is annoying.
I dont hate characters because they are popular. Yeah i know not every fan of Lucario is annoying. So what? I meant to say the ones i knew were. I dont want Lucario in just because i want those certain Lucario fans to cry.:chuckle: and many other reasons of course. If you knew the certains fans i was talking about you'd hate him too.:mad:
 

DarkKry4

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
517
it really annoys me when people say some characters shouldnt be in Brawl cuz of how they look. geez its like the people about Marth ("i dont want that dude chick in Brawl, cuz i hate getting my a** tipped")...seriously.
n who said Lucario were to replace Jiggs and Mew2? ive only heard of the Mew2 one, but never Jiggs.
Its my opinion and if i think Lucario looks a hot mess i can. I mean there are certain characters that i like that their designs were all not that great but if i look at Lucario's abilities in the pokemon series they look bland and something Mewtwo already has(spheres anyone). I find that i still dont like him. I mean they could make a new moveset for him in Brawl but judging him from the pokemon games i wouldnt want him in at all.
 

DarkKry4

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
517
Cause he has "dreadlocks" (which he doesn't) you don't think he'll appear? That's a truely awful excuse.

And why would they take out Jiggs or Mewtwo for him? They will have about 6 Pokemon characters, I think that's pretty safe to asume.

EDIT:

100 Posts!!
100 posts congrats from me now on to the topic!!

Jiggs
Mewtwo
Pokemon Trainer(< 3 in one)
Lucario

Something doesnt look right in the list above. Its Lucario. What i think is a more deserving pokemon should be in that list and one that i actually like(< yes biased opinion sue me:ohwell:). Munchlax would make a perfect rep for the 4th gen and hes probably more popular than Lucario. Though sometimes popularity doesnt mean the character would be in Brawl but it did work for Jigglypuff when she was a character in the first smash bros because of her popularity. Munchlax also is much more uniquely design and was one of the first pokemon revealed. He should be in Brawl not Lucario.
 

Pluvia's other account

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
3,174
Location
No Internet?!?
100 posts congrats from me now on to the topic!!

Jiggs
Mewtwo
Pokemon Trainer(< 3 in one)
Lucario

Something doesnt look right in the list above. Its Lucario. What i think is a more deserving pokemon should be in that list and one that i actually like(< yes biased opinion sue me:ohwell:). Munchlax would make a perfect rep for the 4th gen and hes probably more popular than Lucario. Though sometimes popularity doesnt mean the character would be in Brawl but it did work for Jigglypuff when she was a character in the first smash bros because of her popularity. Munchlax also is much more uniquely design and was one of the first pokemon revealed. He should be in Brawl not Lucario.
I'm rather neutral about Munchlax, If he is was in, Great! If he isn't, it wouldn't even make me blink.

Anyway, Lucario is really popular, heck, you only need to look on this site to see that. Plus he would make for a unique character! His fighting style would be awesome, plus he looks and sounds really cool (I hope they get the same voice actor to do him).
 

Stryks

Smash Hero
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,423
Location
Tijuana cabrones!
Jiggs will probably wont return, in kirbys profile it says hes the only character from melee to not change much... how much can they possibly change about jiggly? also Sakurai always planned to add Pit, but placed Jiggly instead, according to a rumor I heard, if its true, now tha pits here why keep her?

I see the roster like this:

Pikachu - confirmed
Trainer - confirmed
Mew2 - sakurai wanted him in 64, added him in melee, im sure he'll reddem (sp?) himself and make him WAY better...
Munchlax - mascot of the 4th gen
Lucario - nintendo has shown some type of importance for this character, was one if not THE 1st character they revealed from the 4th gen and has his own movie even tough hes not legendary...

I wouldnt "cry" like darkkry says, since I dont really care about lucario, but like I said before, Ill defend any character that somone bashes like saying "X CHARACTER WONT BE IN BRAWL CAUSE OF MY THEORY!!" Saying that like its already confirmed is which it isnt is what pisses me off, and btw I pretty much took down everything sandman said in the last page...
 

majoras.

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 29, 2007
Messages
440
Location
TX
Hi, Good Afternoon...

...I only come here to say that lucario sucks and all his fans should die.

Thanks ^.^
 

Stryks

Smash Hero
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,423
Location
Tijuana cabrones!
Majora GTFO, saying that with out any reason on why u hate lucario is just being ********, and saying that any person should die is asking for people to lose all respect towards you...
 

majoras.

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 29, 2007
Messages
440
Location
TX
Majora GTFO, saying that with out any reason on why u hate lucario is just being ********, and saying that any person should die is asking for people to lose all respect towards you...
but i said thanks ^.^
 

Pluvia's other account

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
3,174
Location
No Internet?!?
I was rather neutral about Lucario too at first, I hadn't even thought of him. But then I realised how cool he would be.

The reason why I defend him so much is because I state the reasons why he has a really good chance of appearing.

Whereas I'm yet to hear a good argument against him.

And "Cause I don't like him" is, sadly, not a good enough reason.
 

DarkKry4

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
517
I'm rather neutral about Munchlax, If he is was in, Great! If he isn't, it wouldn't even make me blink.

Anyway, Lucario is really popular, heck, you only need to look on this site to see that. Plus he would make for a unique character! His fighting style would be awesome, plus he looks and sounds really cool (I hope they get the same voice actor to do him).
He is popular on this site but i'd Munchlax is more popular outside of this site. I dont think he is unique at all and he looks bland to me. His body figure closely resembles Mewtwo. He might even be a Mewtwo clone with the similarities they have if he makes it in Brawl that is. Just from judging him from his abilities in the pokemon games i wouldnt want him in.
 

Kirby knight

Smash Lord
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
1,479
Location
Pennsylvania
He is popular on this site but i'd Munchlax is more popular outside of this site. I dont think he is unique at all and he looks bland to me. His body figure closely resembles Mewtwo. He might even be a Mewtwo clone with the similarities they have if he makes it in Brawl that is. Just from judging him from his abilities in the pokemon games i wouldnt want him in.
True enough, I'm not going to deny anything about that Lucario does look a bit similar too Mewtwo, however he does bring a unique Aura based fighting style to the game.

On that note, I see a common argument to lucario is that he brings nothing new to SSBB, I mean that could apply to a many number or characters already in the game. I mean what would Munchlax bring to the table? He just seems like a heavy Jigglypuff.

On other sites as well at this one Lucario has a very big fanbase. Munchlax is the only pokemon that will give Lucario a run for his money and even then Lucario still comes out on top; at least imo.
 

Stryks

Smash Hero
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,423
Location
Tijuana cabrones!
The other thing is he gives biased opinions:

Bowser jr is a filler in every mario game, but they should add petey...

He said Black knight is generic and shouldnt be added, hes refering to the name and status, then I say what about Pokemon trainer, isnt HE generic? and isnt an evil king (meaning ashnard) a generic role?

He ignores that and then He says they shouldnt add a character without showing facial expressions, meaning no Black knight, then I say what about samus? he ignores it and then says theres too MANY no expressions characters, which are just GAW and samus... how is that too many?

They shouldnt add bowser jr cause a father shouldnt fight his son, then I go: but mario and bowser can team up to take down peach, ganondorf and zelda can join to take down link, and so on, meaning that doesnt matter it smash...

He also goes that the character added will be from a single game, e.x. Zelda characters will only be TP characters... thus WW link cant get it due to his theory, which is BS... BUT he wants diddy even tough he didnt apepar in jungle beat, meaning his just prefering characters, his theory fails and everything he says is bias...

He then says they shouldnt add megaman cause hes blue, so? theres already too many human characters, and were BOUDN to get more....

He says we should add ryu instead, even tough capcom/megaman has more games, was part of the NES era like ryu, continues to appear in nintendo consoles and is the 2nd most wanted 3rd party, but STILL wants Ryu...

THEN he says they should add Ryu cause there isnt a REAL ninja, I say we dont have ONE FULL ROBOT in the game, but u want ANOTHER ninja?

He then says brawl will be diferent from melee, saying theyre wont be clones, yet says bowser jr would be to identical to bowser and krystal if he has the paintbrush, not only does he fails because what he said in the 1st place, but since he wants another ninja, hes going against his OWN words of brawl being diferent...

Sandman fails...
also sandman making drawings like that is showing ur running out of "facts" and ur childish behaviour, grow up...
 

DarkKry4

Smash Ace
Joined
Oct 16, 2006
Messages
517
Haha LOL!! Is that a huge pwning i'm smelling. Your friend is a great at drawing sandman.
 

Stryks

Smash Hero
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,423
Location
Tijuana cabrones!
1) Dont double post

and

2) How is it a joke? what if I put squirtle, sonic, petey or any other character u guys want in brawl? then it wouldnt be a joke right it would be offensive >.>

Fact of the matter is sandman hasnt even responded to what I siad, he knows he burned himself and doesnt want to admit it, so until then evey time he reappears im gonna quote that until he responds...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom