He said he won matches, not sets. Like when he got 4 stocked by John's Peach, then later beat his Marth on Rainbow Cruise, then again got 4(or maybe 3) stocked by his Peach. John sandbagged the second match 'cause he didn't really care about winning it since he was sure to win the set anyways. Evan has never actually won a set against anyone in the top 10.
P.S.
Are you agreeing with me or arguing against me? I'm really not getting what it is you're trying to say.
how long was this ago? i can say it with confidence that it will be almost impossible for anyone in top 10 to 4 or 3 stock evan unless evan really mess up in a game. set to set doesnt really matter to me cause when i do mm or in a tourney i focus on the single match, not worrying about winning the set. so a win to me still a win.
im agree and against you. im against you cause whomever you are, obviously not nate, is very confident that you can beat evan/matt without much trouble, but the truth is, he puts pressure during games against anyone. Even though i don't understand melee but i can tell how players are played and how concentrated they are during a match, don't tell me you sandbag cause for the last couple of tournament i've been watching, everyone is trying to win. SANDBAG is a choice of your own, not evan's
im agreeing with you whatever the reasoning you came up to go against evan.
Evan: seriously, you're trying too hard to get into top 10, if you can't beat them now, then try harder and wait for your chances next time. if they didn't care then one of the spot is yours, i mean you don't care if they gave up and quit melee right? you only want to be in one of the spot..
then theres this thing that, for all they care, they could just play you, beat you and prove you wrong that you're not in top 10. After all they are still better than you.