Did kuz follow it up?
His tone was serious, but he just dropped it when nobody followed it up, that's why it's wierd and uncomfortable.
I guess what I'm not understanding is that Kuz did keep talking about the hammer, well into toDay trying to bargain with Swiss over who gets the hammer and such, so I'm not seeing where you said he dropped it when it wasn't followed up.
I feel like you're subsisting on pointing out supposed hypocrosy, but note that I'm not dismissing a case against me via this method. I'm dismissing his dismissal of my case against kuz, something that was taken quite seriously by the better players in the game and something I'd already been explain and continued explaining.
So, I was being a d*ck because he was calling my play dumb, not because he was making a case on me. I was pointing out that calling it dumb or scum said more about his level of play then mine. Ultimately an exertion to take my case seriously and vote toastin.
Gorf on the other hand, used it as his exclusive method for dealing with cases against him, without making significant contributions in other areas. Hence the flailing scum read.
Now that I've explained why it's not hypocrisy, would you vote toastin?
Kk fair enough, the bolded parts do make sense to me.
Unvote
I'm still not convinced of a toastin lynch, however, and I would like to see his/their responses to my post/recent activity next time they post.
Adum, what are your thoughts on Blazer's entrance and the reaction to it?
You've misunderstood. My argument in 225 was that Ditz had said two things in contradiction to one another, the net result being that it looked like he was faking reads when questioned by _ in _.
Ah kk, either way I didn't take it as a bad thing because after watching your process of voting, getting a reaction from Dietz and then unvoting, I assumed your initial vote was only a slight suspicion and thus meant to apply pressure. Is that correct?
What I wanted was for Toastin and Soup to explain beyond your reasoning why they were voting for Deitz, because I didn't feel like their votes were simply for pressure when they hopped on the wagon.
What could be confusing about the bolded, lol. It says they're both suspicious and that I'd elaborate when I'm on terra firma, i.e. a computer rather than a phone. Since then I'm pretty sure that Soup is D>S. But it reflects badly on Toast that they didn't give up on this line of reasoning with Ditz after he started playing the game; the push to activity and a reaction shot was all that my reasoning could sustain.
>< I was just tired and couldn't figure out wth "sus" meant...now it makes sense lol. But kk, I like that train of thought.
Two questions, what do you think of Soup's reaction to Blazer? Do you think that his play altogether leans D>S, or just in the case of the Deitz wagon?
Vote: Ragnarock
Soup, reason for your vote on Blazer? And can you explain what you specifically dislike about the quote you quoted in your #444?
Blazer, if you had to lynch someone right now, who would it be?
