JOE!
Smash Hero
how would forms work?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
no, I mean how does he magicaly transform into these forms, and then use these magical abilities?
Wait for it......
The Eco within his body. In Jak II he is pumped with Dark Eco allowing him to transform into Dark Jak. It's really not "magical" its biological.
Plus, Jak is bad-a**. Don't f*ck with him.
SHAZAM.What is Eco?
how does it change his biology nstantaneously and allow him to bend physics?
Fair enough. Given those things however, it is completely within bounds to ascribe anthropomorphic features to those mammals due to one of the little clauses in this thread that talk about "scientific equivalents." There are animals we can base their traits off of. Same can be said of Clank getting the "humaniform" treatment as well, considering that there are robots about his size in our world.Ok then. Well. D*mn......YOU WERE STILLBORN!
In all actuality, you win case and point. I merely was stating that it could be used realistically. Now, the fact still remains, if this is about realism. Then Ratchet doesn't exist or is an animal in the zoo. Clank is a toaster. Daxter must scramble around on the ground in search of food. And there are no Sci-Fi weapons....
This obviously isn't true realism, now is it?
What isn't "stopping" the beings from existing or at least allowing them to be sentient enough to use weapons? Contradiction? You say that nothing stops these creatures from standing upright, talking, and using weapons? Then you tell me that it has to be real and fit the nature of reality and physics.....ok.There is nothing "stopping" these beings from ever existing...so 1st argument is out
and clank and the sci-fi weapons are plausible unless physics say otherwise, which is what our "future tech" clause is. As long as it could exist, but we just havent developed it yet, doesnt mean it's a no-go
Ok, with that logic, then what is to say about Jak being from a planet that has an energy source, Eco, allowing him to undergo a mutation? We haven't seen it happen. But then again, like you said: this doesn't mean it couldn't happen. It would be similar to radiation, but not harmful.im not trying to push you away, all im doing is saying what can and cannot work...
as for the anthros, what isnt stopping them is the power of evolution...
essentially all out ranthros are not from earth, and thus who knows what forces could have made their evolution favor what they bacame on their panets? there is nothign biologically stopping anthros from existing, it just hasnt happened
Jak also had armor in Jak 3, but it was no where near as protective as Ratchets is. Either way, I see this in Ratchet's favor because of the experience that he has with his weapons and his armor. I think Dax could hold his own against Clank, but the Lombax is deadlier than Jak and the Ottsel.Ah, yes, I forgot about Ratchet haveing superior armor. In the Future Games, Ratchet purchases and uses armor that is full-body and reduces damage greatly (The game descriptions list them as reducing 25/33/50% of all damage in typical game fashion, although Im sure that the armor can still take quite the beatingfpr Ratchet). As for Clank's "Gadgets", I listed the ones I think would be hte most plausible in my post, but there are more. Clank is connected to and is helped by the mysterious Zoni, who have the power of time that they give Clank. This includes slowing time in concentrated areas using a large supply of time grenades, fighting with a staff called teh Chronoscepter (although he did give it away at the end of CiT), and the ability to "reverse the destruction" of objects and machinery, fixing them by rewinding them until they are back into functional state. Im not sure how we can explain time manipulation though, so I left that out.
Clank was also given a selection of abilities in Tools ofDestruction, although these abilities were removed in QfB and CiT. These included wings that could catch wind currents, and a Geo-laser that drew holes in rock.
Welcome to The Deadliest Brawler. There are certain things that are deemed realistic and unrealistic in the thread. Jak transforming would be unrealistic but Daxter and ratchet existing we deem realistic for the purpose of the thread. I will admit though, seeing these two in a canon battle Jak wins. But since guns prevail in reality and Ratchet hseems to have better ones, he seems to take this one. Don't take anyone's comments to heart though; it's just that there isn't much tolerence for fanboyism.Ok then. Well. D*mn......YOU WERE STILLBORN!
In all actuality, you win case and point. I merely was stating that it could be used realistically. Now, the fact still remains, if this is about realism. Then Ratchet doesn't exist or is an animal in the zoo. Clank is a toaster. Daxter must scramble around on the ground in search of food. And there are no Sci-Fi weapons....
This obviously isn't true realism, now is it?
how would his body react to the eco that would cause him to undergo a mutation?Ok, with that logic, then what is to say about Jak being from a planet that has an energy source, Eco, allowing him to undergo a mutation? We haven't seen it happen. But then again, like you said: this doesn't mean it couldn't happen. It would be similar to radiation, but not harmful.
I can't think of a real world, substitution for Eco because there isn't one. I can understand your side of the argument, so if there is no eco, that's fine. I just wanted to point out that there could always be a possibility.
how would his body react to the eco that would cause him to undergo a mutation?
whatever species he is would have to have been in contact with it for millions of years for not only a resistance but a positive effect to arise from it and to pass that down. Also, how would he be able to revert himself?
EDIT: these are questions you should be asking yourself if you want to make a point to pass off This Clause
thiiiiiiiiiiis guuuuuuuuy
Can you pull sumthin to convince people Jak wins? If not then...yea...
hmm I see...well, we decided on a Rachet victory?
(that and I have photoshop pics pre-made)
r u talkin to me or NaCl?Can you pull sumthin to convince people Jak wins? If not then...yea...