Glad to see you TPC!
I disagree with the Vergeben statement kinda. He INSISTED on things such as Pikmin 3, a non-Link's Awakening 2D Zelda, Star Fox Grand Prix...he ****ed up big time. And that's not even getting started on the Minecraft debacle.
Erdrick is 100% still in in my book, but instead of relying on Verge here I'm really just depending on what Tansut says. There are currently very few really credible leakers.
Glad to see you too old friend.
Vergeben has never been, and will never be, a completely credible leaker. If Gematsu with Sm4sh is the cool uncle who pretty much always gets you the rarest toy you want (even if it's last year's rare toy), then Vergeben with Smash Ultimate is the sleezeball uncle who throws coins at you from under the table when you're eating dinner as a family when you say you're good at dodgeball and sells your Playstation that you gave to your cousin for drug money. You may not like him, but he's your uncle so you have to deal with him.
You are right in trusting Tansut, but I personally don't believe Verge is completely dead. Yeah, he botched this one, but there seem to be a multitude of reasons for that, which, while they don't excuse his being incorrect, explain some things. No, I can not tell you these reasons.
You have done nothing against me. But I have heard that argument more than once for more than just Erdick (a couple of time here earlier in the post on top of it) when people seem to fail to realize that one of the big things Nintendo has done is to do their damndest to repair relationship status with third-party support. It is getting facepalm worthy.
We have a Blizzard game on a Nintendo product for the first time in 18 years and it got an entire commercial on its own. Does that mean a Blizzard character is getting into Smash? We have them pushing Fortnite hard, does that mean we are getting a fortnite dude in Smash? Like I said in the editing, with your argument we might as well get Sora considering they highlight Disney side by side, with one of the key things in MUA3 is a certain character that just so happens to get a movie release next month.
Except with Dragon Quest it's not so much a desperate attempt to mend bridges as it is a continual pattern of Nintendo covering for this series. This has been a thing since the initial release of the series in the 80s, when Nintendo
literally gave out copies of the original Dragon Quest game in America. Since then they have continually published titles of the series in America, a distinction only granted to Dragon Quest (and LEVEL-5 games during the Wii/DS era, though this has since largely stopped). Nintendo has literally licensed out
THEIR CHARACTERS to Square Enix for the Fortune Street series, which is a spin-off of Dragon Quest. They pretty much never do that, yet for Dragon Quest they do.
You're mistaking my argument and exaggerating it to a ridiculous level. Nintendo has an incredibly strong relationship with the Dragon Quest series and the prominent spot that Dragon Quest XI S got in the Direct is further proof of that. Not every game gets a huge chunk of a Direct to sell itself, especially alongside Nintendo heavy-hitters like Fire Emblem Three Houses, Mario Maker 2, and Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening Remastered,
but Dragon Quest does. If you refuse to acknowledge this as evidence for Erdrick then you're simply denying facts; Nintendo's relationship with Dragon Quest, and subsequently Erdrick, makes him much more likely than any of us really think.