malva00
Smash Master
^^^ Laughawaffa jk
So I think I'm growing to grow my goatee back
So I think I'm growing to grow my goatee back
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
/fixed^^^ Laughawaffa jk
So I think I'm going to grow my goatee back
I know, right?lol at "people will be disappointed when nothing actually happens in 2012"
i hear that. ill be really disappointed when i dont die in 2012. or whatever supposed to happen on that date.lol 2012 is just a cash cow.
HYPE when 2012 actually arrives, boy, are people gonna be disappointed when nothing happens.
It erupted in a scene in the movie. It doesn't show anything else about it after the family escapes it. Experts say the movie is inaccurate, because the real eruption would be much larger.I've heard stuff about Yellowstone in 2012. It erupts aprox every 600,000 years, and the last eruption was about aprox. 600,000 years ago.
http://io9.com/5122615/yellowstone-due-for-eruption-that-could-obliterate-north-america
post 2000 w00t
Sounds good, although i can't see it happening..JaimeHR said:Project Venus anyone? http://www.thevenusproject.com/
China will be the first power in like 25 years, with nearly 1400 million people, it will make USA look like an average country.
No offense, but that doesn't seem feasible in any way.Project Venus anyone? http://www.thevenusproject.com/
This is wrong. As the world population grows to incredibly high numbers the resources are going to be used up incredibly quickly. Currently, for America, it costs approximately $100,000 just to raise a child to age 18. Our resources are definitely finite; we can't continuously pillage the earth and expect there to always be stuff.The premise upon which this system is based is that the Earth is abundant with plentiful resource;
Oh. This was written by conspiracy theorist nutjobs who probably visit prisonplanet.com. No wonder why this doesn't make sense. I stopped reading here.We must emphasize that this approach to global governance has nothing whatever in common with the present aims of an elite to form a world government with themselves and large corporations at the helm, and the vast majority of the world's population subservient to them.
As much as i hate it, we must face it... USA/Europe will be dwarfed. Most of the chinese work 10-12 or more hours a day, and they are already the main industry of the world. Their economy grows several times faster than ours. Their population is bigger than USA/Europe combined. Once their income per capita is big enough, we should expect something like japan but 10 times biggerLMFAO
A book doesn't make sense if you start reading it from the climax...No wonder why this doesn't make sense. I stopped reading here.
Sadly, countries need weapons and military for security purposes.A book doesn't make sense if you start reading it from the climax...
The resource-based economy is more than just "removing the money". It suggest to change our culture first and the way we "power-up" our world.
we are still using Oil and making weapons of mass destruction when we could invest on alternative energy sources that don't harm the planet as much as Oil does, we could invest more on reforestation projects to at least try to heal our planet, instead of better and deadlier weapons that only destroy the environment.
I think we do have enough resources but we are using them wrong, we invest on death rather than life, destruction rather than creation, the personal needs rather than the common good.
You don't know anything about capitalism. It's a lack of capitalism that squanders resources. The whole point of the free market is that prices will settle at an equilibrium where benefits are equal to costs. Government subsidies, taxes, and so forth distort this.Sadly, countries need weapons and military for security purposes.
And yes, those ideas are great, but there are some major problems. For example, oil would be cheaper than alternate energies, so there always will be (sadly again) people who will want to save money. Same for teh trees. Why do a reforestation when you can get paper and other stuff from already existing trees?
Money and capitalism destroys this world
So we need to change our super capitalist mentality or we are doomed. Starting for the usa of course, the most extreme capitalist country in the world.
How will using oil ever be less expensive than using sunlight? I'm pretty sure than sunlight will never run out, and if it did, we're all screwed anyways.If oil is cheaper than alternate energy, then people are justified in using oil. If oil becomes more scarce, it will go up in price and alternate energies will become more attractive. I'm just trying to say that running out of resources will be reflected in the market.