• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Social Social Thread - Please Read Last Post

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZephyrZ

But.....DRAGONS
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
10,863
Location
Southern California
NNID
AbsolBlade
3DS FC
4210-4109-6434
Switch FC
SW-1754-5854-0794
Sorry, I don't buy that for two reasons. One is, Dynamaxing is nothing more than simply scaling models (unless GF is too incompetent to know how to scale models on the fly and has a separate model for each Pokemon, in that case, RIP filesize) and that's something even the 3DS could've handled. Simply changing a models size isn't taxing on the hardware, as it doesn't improve the model at all. The poly count, textures, animations, bone structure, etc all stay the same.

Secondly, if they want to give a sense of scale, why did they get rid of the one feature of Let's Go that everyone wanted to carry over into the main games, namely realistically sized in-battle models? We've already seen the models are back to being 3DS sized when in battle, when even Colosseum got that right. And before you say that, for example, a Wailord would undermine the sense of scale of Dynamaxing, then that just proves it's a stupid gimmick where compromises had to be made just to have it appear special.

In short, no matter how you slice it, it's just another one of GF's battle gimmicks that will be gone next generation. First they already were phasing out Mega Evolutions in Gen 7 by making the post-game while not adding any new ones (Ultra Necrozma being arguably an exception, but even then it's up to interpretation) and now they got rid of Z-Moves. And with how they stated that Dynamaxing is is more or less tied to Galar, we probably won't see a return of it next gen either. I wish they'd focus more on stuff that sticks around instead of one-off gimmicks just to force something to make a region feel special. Megas were a step in the right direction, even if they got kinda whack with ORAS giving us Rayquaza, who doesn't need a stone, as well as the ability to have both Primals on the same team with no restrictions. Instead of ditching them, I'd rather have that they had tried to rebalance that mess.

And speaking of one-offs, that's also why I'm not to big of a fan of Alola and Galar forms. It's not that I dislike the Pokemon, but that they are way too tied to their specific regions to appear anywhere else. I mean, it's right in their names even. So unless they decided to let us visit Alola and Galar in future generations, we're back to being stuck with their base forms. Granted, Let's Go let us get them via in-game trade, but it just feels much less personal, not to mention, if SM is any indications, we can't breed for the specific mon and what we get will always be tied to the region the game takes place, no matter if it's, for example, a normal or an Alola Meowth. Even if you breed a normal Meowth in SM, you'll still get A-Meowth.

Well, that's enough ranting for me for now. And on a slightly related note, the first reviews of Little Town Hero are out now.
Geez, you can't say anything about Pokemon these days without setting someone off on a rant. I wasn't even defending dynamaxing! I'm actually pretty unimpressed by it myself.

First of all, scaled models do seem to be back from Let's Go. It's hard to tell in the combat since most of it has showcased pokemon of around the same size, but if you look at the wild area trailer you can see a Gyarados dwarfing a Frislish and a gigantic Golurk with a tiny Ghastly and Duskull nearby. The pokemon we do seem in battle It's been observed that all pokemon dynamaxed pokemon grow to the same size, but that kind of makes sense from a development standpoint - having dynamaxed pokemon to scale would either make some too small or too big.

Anyway I'm no game design expert but surely there's more to making a Pokemon huge then simply polygon count, right? Sun and Moon were already pushing the 3DS's hardware to its absolute limit, and I sincerely doubt supersizing a pokemon wouldn't cause more strain on it.

But regardless, I'm not defending dynamaxing. I think its an underwhelming gimmick as well. I'm just trying to understand GF's reasoning without being needlessly cynical. They probably think dyamaxing is a really cool feature worth putting at the forefront of their advertising. You and I may disagree with that, but I don't think its impossible to understand where they're coming from. In fact reception to dynamaxing was fairly warm until the natdex controversy surfaced.
 

Professor Pumpkaboo

Lady Layton| Trap Queen♥
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
81,170
Location
IDOLM@STER Side M Hell, Virginia Beach
Switch FC
SW: 5586-2837-4585
I told the truth but like damn that hot me harder than I expected. Like, I knew she was going to take it rough but seeing her become human for just a second to only say goodbye was pretty heartbreaking not gonna lie.

This games great.
When you talk to the party in The Strand they say things about Shell and Eriks is the best. He said in a way "lets get out of here, it gives me the creeps. Its like time has stopped....Just like it stopped for Michelle"
 

BlueMonk

Smash Champion
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
2,363
damn people get really salty about gen 1 lol

like I get feeling down that other gens might be missing out but its one trailer and we already know that there are gen 8 pokes that can gigagigamantamax anyways so clearly it isn't just gen 1
 

Shroob

Sup?
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
41,829
Location
Washington
damn people get really salty about gen 1 lol

like I get feeling down that other gens might be missing out but its one trailer and we already know that there are gen 8 pokes that can gigagigamantamax anyways so clearly it isn't just gen 1
Tbh, it's because gen1 nostalgia isn't natural, it's forced.

Pokemon company loves shoving in Gen1 as much as they can and, I'm sorry but Gen 1 just isn't my favorite gen.
 

Shroob

Sup?
Joined
Sep 26, 2013
Messages
41,829
Location
Washington
I think people would appreciate gen1 pandering if it felt more natural.

Compare:

A bunch of people online coming together, talking about something they loved growing up, and getting a revival out of it

To

"Ey boi. Ya like gen1? Course ya do, everyone loves gen1."
 

Ramen Tengoku

Meiniac
Joined
Sep 7, 2018
Messages
15,719
Location
Somewhere
Switch FC
SW-6056-3633-7710
tbh, gen 1 probably has some of the weaker batch of pokemon introduced throughout the series..

Sure, you got classics like Pikachu, Eevee, and I do love me the Vulpix line,

but wow a lot of them feel like filler and I completely forget they exist at some points.

Like I keep having to remind myself that Tangella and Seel were Gen 1

you can tell that they were still trying to hone their skills at that point.
 
Last edited:

Guh-Huzzah!

Totally humorous voice over and YouTube guy.
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
19,309
Location
A van down by the river
Switch FC
SW-2454-8991-5893
I think people would appreciate gen1 pandering if it felt more natural.

Compare:

A bunch of people online coming together, talking about something they loved growing up, and getting a revival out of it

To

"Ey boi. Ya like gen1? Course ya do, everyone loves gen1."
The Gen 1 pandering never bothered me. I just seem each Pokemon as a Pokemon. I don't really associate them with their generations.
 

BlueMonk

Smash Champion
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
2,363
Tbh, it's because gen1 nostalgia isn't natural, it's forced.

Pokemon company loves shoving in Gen1 as much as they can and, I'm sorry but Gen 1 just isn't my favorite gen.
Well, regardless of being gen 1 or not, all the pokemon in this trailer are pretty popular. It's not like they revealed gigantamax tangela or something. My main point is that we've already seen gigantamaxing goes beyond gen 1 but people are freaking out as if they just confirmed every giant form will be gen 1

We haven't seen all the forms yet, and considering obstagoon exists I think it's pretty likely it won't just be kanto

my other main point is that seeing people get disproportionately angry over every thing that gets revealed is kind of funny lol
 

Sour Supreme

サイマグネット
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
2,704
Location
The Homebrew Channel
I'm really not a big fan of Pokemon that are just personified objects that would otherwise be inanimate. And I don't mean Rotom, I mean like, the food ones.
Like am I the only one that finds these dudes lame?
 

ZephyrZ

But.....DRAGONS
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
10,863
Location
Southern California
NNID
AbsolBlade
3DS FC
4210-4109-6434
Switch FC
SW-1754-5854-0794
I mean, I don't think most of the pokemon are bad choices for gigantamax.

Pikachu and Eevee are mascots, so they get special treatment.

Meowth has had an iconic roll in the anime for a long time, so he's been overdue for some special treatment in the games.

Beedrill got a mega that was actually pretty good before while Butterfree got nothing. Although now that megas are gone...a soul for a soul I guess?

Charizard seems a bit excessive though, even if the design is growing on me.
I think people would appreciate gen1 pandering if it felt more natural.

Compare:

A bunch of people online coming together, talking about something they loved growing up, and getting a revival out of it

To

"Ey boi. Ya like gen1? Course ya do, everyone loves gen1."
Surely you haven't forgotten genwunning already, have you Shroob?

I feel like they're partly at fault here.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Trailer's out now

I was hopeful, but not gonna lie, these designs are a little dissapointing.

I mean, look at Pikachu and Eevee. Pikachu is just chubbier and Eevee's "mane" is bigger. That's the only difference.

I'm not mad, but these designs are pretty underwhelming.
 

nessdeltarune00

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Nov 26, 2018
Messages
1,523
Alright, if these were our final two fighters passes (assuming Ryu Hayabusa is our final character for pass 1) how would this board react?

1. Phoenix Wright
2. Doom Slayer
3. Crash Bandicoot
4. Scorpion
5. Reimu

1. Monokuma
2. Jill Valentine/Leon Kennedy
3. Master Chief
4. Heihachi
5. Sora
 

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,866
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
Alright, if these were our final two fighters passes (assuming Ryu Hayabusa is our final character for pass 1) how would this board react?

1. Phoenix Wright
2. Doom Slayer
3. Crash Bandicoot
4. Scorpion
5. Reimu

1. Monokuma
2. Jill Valentine/Leon Kennedy
3. Master Chief
4. Heihachi
5. Sora
I'd sooner question how Monokuma would even work
 

Cosmic77

Smash Hero
Joined
Dec 17, 2017
Messages
9,547
Location
On a planet far far away...
Switch FC
2166-0541-5238
Most of the Gen I Pokemon who we see most frequently are exactly who you'd expect to get promoted. Pikachu, Eevee, Meowth, Charizard, the starters, Gengar, Dragonite, Mewtwo - the usual.

I think "Everyone knows who these Pokemon are. Let's promote them." is closer than, "Everyone loves these Pokemon. Let's promote them". Game Freak is just taking advantage of their most iconic Pokemon. Pikachu and Charizard are probably two of the most effective Pokemon they have when it comes to attracting casuals who don't keep up with Pokemon.
 
Last edited:

ZephyrZ

But.....DRAGONS
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
10,863
Location
Southern California
NNID
AbsolBlade
3DS FC
4210-4109-6434
Switch FC
SW-1754-5854-0794
I'm really not a big fan of Pokemon that are just personified objects that would otherwise be inanimate. And I don't mean Rotom, I mean like, the food ones.
Like am I the only one that finds these dudes lame?
No, there's plenty of people out there who share your opinion.

However, Vanilluxe is actually one of my sister's favorites. Everyone has different taste.
 

Sour Supreme

サイマグネット
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
2,704
Location
The Homebrew Channel
Alright, if these were our final two fighters passes (assuming Ryu Hayabusa is our final character for pass 1) how would this board react?

1. Phoenix Wright
2. Doom Slayer
3. Crash Bandicoot
4. Scorpion
5. Reimu

1. Monokuma
2. Jill Valentine/Leon Kennedy
3. Master Chief
4. Heihachi
5. Sora
Turning the Social into the Speculation, I see. I would be pretty content with this lineup, I suppose. Not huge on Chief although I was a big Halo fan. Sora, Heihachi, Jill, Doom, and Phoenix are all welcome on my roster. Scorpion would be sick but I don't know that we would get a Mortal Kombat character.
Everyone has different taste.
I see what you did there, even if you didn't mean to do it. ;)
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member

Guest
Geez, you can't say anything about Pokemon these days without setting someone off on a rant. I wasn't even defending dynamaxing! I'm actually pretty unimpressed by it myself.
I never said you are defending it, I'm replying to you saying it's meant to showcase the jump in hardware and why that doesn't make sense. Big difference.

First of all, scaled models do seem to be back from Let's Go. It's hard to tell in the combat since most of it has showcased pokemon of around the same size, but if you look at the wild area trailer you can see a Gyarados dwarfing a Frislish and a gigantic Golurk with a tiny Ghastly and Duskull nearby. The pokemon we do seem in battle It's been observed that all pokemon dynamaxed pokemon grow to the same size, but that kind of makes sense from a development standpoint - having dynamaxed pokemon to scale would either make some too small or too big.
We've seen Tyrnitar both in a battle and on the overworld and no, it is downsized when in battle, noticeably so. You can't have a better comparison than showcasing the same Pokemon in two different scenarios.

Anyway I'm no game design expert but surely there's more to making a Pokemon huge then simply polygon count, right? Sun and Moon were already pushing the 3DS's hardware to its absolute limit, and I sincerely doubt supersizing a pokemon wouldn't cause more strain on it.
My entire point is that making a Pokemon huge has no bearing on the model at all. It's as simple as taking the root bone and multiplying its size by whatever you want, the model, animations, etc. are all unaffected. So whether a Pokemon is big or normal has no influence on how well the hardware can render it, hence why even a 3DS could handle resizing those.

But regardless, I'm not defending dynamaxing. I think its an underwhelming gimmick as well. I'm just trying to understand GF's reasoning without being needlessly cynical.
Pointing out facts is not being cynical, it's being realistic. And if Dynamaxing really is GF's way to showcase the jump in hardware, then it's just sad, because a big model is not more taxing than a small one. It's not like a big model will suddenly increase in poly-count. The only stuff that could, in theory affect performance by resizing, are effects like Moltres' wings, depending on how those are handled.
 

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,866
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
Most of the Gen I Pokemon who we see most frequently are exactly who you'd expect to get promoted. Pikachu, Eevee, Meowth, Charizard, the starters, Gengar, Dragonite, Mewtwo - the usual.

I think "Everyone knows who these Pokemon are. Let's promote them." is closer than, "Everyone loves these Pokemon. Let's promote them". Game Freak is just taking advantage of their most iconic Pokemon.
Exactly, they're taking advantage by stealing their wages to become billionares. Fellas, we need to unionize Pokemon
 

StormC

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
8,300
>click thread
>unironically see ICE CREAM POKEMON LOLOLOLOL

Anti-Unova camp stay losing.
 

Noipoi

Howdy!
Joined
Jun 19, 2018
Messages
52,989
Location
Viva La France
Alright, if these were our final two fighters passes (assuming Ryu Hayabusa is our final character for pass 1) how would this board react?

1. Phoenix Wright
2. Doom Slayer
3. Crash Bandicoot
4. Scorpion
5. Reimu

1. Monokuma
2. Jill Valentine/Leon Kennedy
3. Master Chief
4. Heihachi
5. Sora
I think these dinguses would be pretty alright with that, actually.
 

Guh-Huzzah!

Totally humorous voice over and YouTube guy.
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
19,309
Location
A van down by the river
Switch FC
SW-2454-8991-5893
Alright, if these were our final two fighters passes (assuming Ryu Hayabusa is our final character for pass 1) how would this board react?

1. Phoenix Wright
2. Doom Slayer
3. Crash Bandicoot
4. Scorpion
5. Reimu

1. Monokuma
2. Jill Valentine/Leon Kennedy
3. Master Chief
4. Heihachi
5. Sora
I really don't care for any of these characters, but I'd be fine with it. A new character is a new character. I'll take it.
 

NonSpecificGuy

V Has Come To
Super Moderator
Premium
Writing Team
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
14,022
Location
Mother Base
NNID
Goldeneye2674
3DS FC
0989-1770-6584
>click thread
>unironically see ICE CREAM POKEMON LOLOLOLOL

Anti-Unova camp stay losing.
I mean, let's be honest, every single Generation has a couple bad designs and... I think Ice Cream is a legit bad design.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
I hope I don't see like I'm saying "POKEMAN BAD" by saying I'm disappointed with these new designs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom