Shroob
Sup?
Imagine if Isaac had been revealed alongside Isabelle.
Box theory wouldn't have even been a thing.
Box theory wouldn't have even been a thing.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
i think LKD's reason for the delay was cities skylines. that game has natural disasters as a feature and i wouldn't be surprised if there was a bit talking about that during the direct that got cut outI’m neutral with the September Direct Isaac theory. I think Isabelle was most definitely supposed to be the ending announcement, but I don’t think Isaac being cut because of the Earthquake is that far fetched, though I do see why people don’t believe it. I do remember LKD saying that “the reason why the direct was delayed should be obvious when it airs again” so whether or not you believe LKD, either she got bad info again or they cut Isaac completely because there was nothing in that direct that looked offensive towards the Earthquake. If I had to speculate if the theory is true, I’d imagine Isaac was supposed to be revealed before the box, and then the box leads into Isabelle which leads into the Animal Crossing announcement. Of course that still happened except there was no Isaac.
At THIS time of year?Aurora Borealis
There might have been two trailers intended to be in the Nintendo Direct (Isaac's at the start, Isabelle's at the end).The Animal Crossing announcement was too intertwined with Isabelle's trailer for it to have been anything else. Unless Isaac was advertising the new AC game himself.
My series is dead, but you know what series isn't dead? Animal Crossing. Buy it.
I don't get it.Aurora Borealis
ACP-PLV (Eric's place of employment) demonstrating how they print materialsWhat was the video
Stop, I can only get so erect.Box theory wouldn't have even been a thing.
Small correction, the Rathalos post was after 8/8, not the September Direct. It's still possible that it was a hint, but definitely not retroactivelyAlso that Rathalos tweet that seemed to be hinting Golden Sun just a few days after that direct would really make sense now if Isaac’s reveal was cut, and Sakurai just wanted to give us a hint he was still coming.
Papagenos has a new theory.(But on a serious note anything new happen)
People are saying both Isabelle and Isaac were originally in the Direct, not that Isabelle replaced Isaac.The Animal Crossing announcement was too intertwined with Isabelle's trailer for it to have been anything else. Unless Isaac was advertising the new AC game himself.
My series is dead, but you know what series isn't dead? Animal Crossing. Buy it.
Oh, okACP-PLV (Eric's place of employment) demonstrating how they print materials
My mistake. But yes, I still think it was a hint.Small correction, the Rathalos post was after 8/8, not the September Direct. It's still possible that it was a hint, but definitely not retroactively
Hey, if they put in Decidueye, Skull Kid or Waddle Dee, I won't care an iota about this leak, even if I am on #teamrealIf Decidueye gets revealed it will be legendary
So you think Isaac was the character that used Earthquake, which supposedly was removed from the Direct?Hm.
So like I said discussing the earthquake thing makes me feel very uncomfortable, and I don't really care whether it's "logical" for me to feel that way or not
But...
- Isaac's spot in the mural matches up with the messed up bit in Isabelle's mural.
- The mural not being at the end of the Direct makes complete sense if they had to tug it out and modify it.
- The potentially Golden Sun item being plopped into the Wendy's trailer makes much more sense if Isaac was intended to be revealed with it.
- The drought would've been far lessened if we got 2 characters, especially Isaac. I think Sakurai would be aware of this.
- The box would make much more sense if 2 newcomers were to be revealed in the Direct.
...still teamfake...but...
Does it? Is it realistic to think that Nintendo couldn't revise the banner when they had a whole week? Are we sure the picture of Little Mac is real?That theory with Isaac being cut in that Nintendo Direct seems really plausible now with his placement in the Grinch Leak. Somebody call Papa and Billy!
I don't know if anyone realizes it, but the the glitch happens EXACLTY where Little mac's foot ends and Isaac's art begins. Like exactly. Its NOT just the general area. Check this link.
Yeah, assuming that the theory is real, I think the original transition was Isaac reveal > Box reveal > Isabelle reveal > AC reveal. After the Earthquake Isaac was just simply removed from that transition. Not sure why people use Isabelle as an argument for or against the theory because both trailers can co-exist.To be clear Isabelle didn't replace Isaac. Isaac was just simply taken out. Saying this so future arguments don't get mixed up.
As I said I feel incredibly uncomfortable saying that may be the case, but perhaps so.So you think Isaac was the character that used Earthquake, which supposedly was removed from the Direct?
I knew it.People on 4chan have brought up that the weird cut between Olimar and Little Mac that showed up after the Isabelle reveal is right where Isaac is in the banner. This may strengthen the "Isaac was supposed to be revealed in the September direct" theory.
I was shamed for even bringing it up, so...I still don't get why some people don't like the very notion of this being a possibility.
(I get imadethistoseealeak's grievance with it, but the very notion of it? Come on.)
So... where did Olimar go?The cropping lines up exactly where the vine next to Isaac ends. This has to be something here.View attachment 173004
Dear god, I think we're on to something.. ITS JUST KEPT COMING!The cropping lines up exactly where the vine next to Isaac ends. This has to be something here.View attachment 173004
one banner discrepancy doesn't undo the fact that nintendo still announced a new AC at the direct. they also probably don't have that many characters left so multiple smash reveals during a general direct wasn't possible.that's a flaw in logic. people keep discrediting the Isaac theory because they immediately assume that Isabelle was intended to replace Isaac's reveal, and that is what makes them doubt it because of the animal crossing reveal implying that Isabelle was intended to be there from the start.
with this banner discrepancy, don't you think that its more likely Isaac was intended to be revealed with Isabelle? there's nothing saying that the Direct is only allowed one Smash reveal.