D
Deleted member
Guest
Which is why I said he was "relatable" rather than "reasonable"Tbf Ganon just wanted power to help his people but he went mad with it
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Which is why I said he was "relatable" rather than "reasonable"Tbf Ganon just wanted power to help his people but he went mad with it
I mean, Ganon does have some dialogue in ALttP, for example, doesn't mean he's still the same Ganondorf that we knew from OoT.Vaati had spoken lines and human emotions in Four Swords (at the very least, he had the classic villain arrogance, as well as a rather disturbing degree of lust). Four Swords Adventures didn't give him any dialogue or characterization, though. He did get a more fleshed-out personality in Minish Cap, which completely changed his motivation from lust for ...erm, Princess Zelda to a lust for power.
Did you actually play any of those games or are you just making assumptions? Because SS only has Demise as the reasoning for Ganondorf's near immortality and BOTW's placement is unknown(but it pretty much implies it happens at the end point of all the other timelines). People need to stop acting like Ganon and Ganondorf are separate entities, they're one and the same, the names are just used to differentiate the two forms more easily.Ganon's motives are a mess at this point tbh. Wind Waker suggests he cares for the Gerudo but then SS and BOTW come along suggesting that before there was Ganondorf there was Ganon and that his Gerudo form was just some kind of cynical reincarnation (I think Urbosa says something to that effect). SS really didn't help with the whole Demise thing - who wasn't even an interesting villain anyway.
*GASP!!!*I don't know why but somethin' tells me we won't get a direct this week :v
I don't think so either.I don't know why but somethin' tells me we won't get a direct this week :v
I still think something will happen on the 24th. I don't know what strangely obscure thing they'll reveal on that bar event in Montreal, but we might find out soon, I guess.I don't think so either.
I never did.
I do strongly hold we'll have one this month though.
People are weird. They started saying "GUESS NO DIRECT IN OCTOBER" as soon as the first week was over.
Something tells me the secrecy isn't really important.I still think something will happen on the 24th. I don't know what strangely obscure thing they'll reveal on that bar event in Montreal, but we might find out soon, I guess.
I mean where else could Sheik be from? lolYeah but is either from OoT or BotW, so still not a hard rule. ()
EDIT: Also, nice Lilith icon
Yeah, it's just that I'm thinking that what they'll reveal there is something most people wouldn't really expect to see, like Into the Breach, or some Canadian-made game that never got revealed before.Something tells me the secrecy isn't really important.
This isn't an official event (it's not listed on the website of Smash Bros) and even at official events they aren't allowed to stream certain stages due to music or something.
So if they took away streaming completely then they don't have to worry about that.
Not saying that's the reason though. Their wording is definitely teasing something, or so we think, but I honestly doubt it'll amount to much.
Maybe I'm weird but I got unreasonably attached to XI's hero haha so I wouldn't mind.This is clearly fake. The Luminary isn’t even in the same style as everyone else. He kinda clashes and is a bit of an eyesore really lol. I really want a Dragon Quest character in Smash but please not this guy. It has to be Erdrick or Eight.
Huh. Maybe.Yeah, it's just that I'm thinking that what they'll reveal there is something most people wouldn't really expect to see, like Into the Breach, or some Canadian-made game that never got revealed before.
Honestly the more I played 11 the more I thought it was ok. I don't know why but the game burned me out faster than most other games I've played. I still haven't beaten it yet, nor have I played it in 2 weeks.Maybe I'm weird but I got unreasonably attached to XI's hero haha so I wouldn't mind.
But from XI I'd much rather see any of the other party members, especially Jade (...or Rab) in Smash than him.
I also wouldn't mind the Erdrick or Eight, especially since I'm playing VIII at the moment...
Huh. Maybe.
We'll know later, I guess.
I'm expecting more "leaks" than what actually happened, but hey.
No idea.I mean where else could Sheik be from? lol
Yes I did play the games and I know that they're one and the same. But for Nintendo they might as well not be. There's barely any consistency. Wind Waker is the only game where they've given him any kind of relatable motive: in most other stories he either just wants power or is some kind of mindless evil. If BOTW had established that Calamity Ganon once had understandable motives - or any kind of motives at all - then fine, but it doesn't. Any attempt to connect the different depictions of Ganon(dorf) is largely down to the fans: Nintendo tried out a timeline with SS but BOTW showed they're not that fussed about maintaining consistency.I mean, Ganon does have some dialogue in ALttP, for example, doesn't mean he's still the same Ganondorf that we knew from OoT.
Did you actually play any of those games or are you just making assumptions? Because SS only has Demise as the reasoning for Ganondorf's near immortality and BOTW's placement is unknown(but it pretty much implies it happens at the end point of all the other timelines). People need to stop acting like Ganon and Ganondorf are separate entities, they're one and the same, the names are just used to differentiate the two forms more easily.
Calamity Ganon is pretty much implied to be Fall Timeline Ganon(as Child Timeline's is dead(twice) and Adult's is stuck as a stone in the bottom of the ocean) after countless cycles of reincarnation that basically destroyed any remains of Ganondorf, be it mentally or in physical form, he evolved into a being of pure chaos and that actually makes it quite tragic tbh
I beat it in 40-ish hours and then beat the post-game and maxed out the characters about 50 hours after that >_>Honestly the more I played 11 the more I thought it was ok. I don't know why but the game burned me out faster than most other games I've played. I still haven't beaten it yet, nor have I played it in 2 weeks.
Meanwhile, still no idea when or if X will come over here in any form.I beat it in 40-ish hours and then beat the post-game and maxed out the characters about 50 hours after that >_>
It's one of my favorite games that I've played all year for sure. VIII in comparison is kinda burning me out a bit but I'm powering through it.
At the moment XI is my GotY (at least until Smash comes out ofc) haha. But I mean ofc to each their own
Maybe we should just wait for the Final Fantasy XIV of the seriesMeanwhile, still no idea when or if X will come over here in any form.
Their most recent explanation of BOTW on the timeline literally boiled down to "It's up to the player". The timeline has never been big on Nintendo's agenda and I always thought it was best just to take whatever they gave you and not worry about connecting all of the lines. Because they've made no way to connect them.Yes I did play the games and I know that they're one and the same. But for Nintendo they might as well not be. There's barely any consistency. Wind Waker is the only game where they've given him any kind of relatable motive: in most other stories he either just wants power or is some kind of mindless evil. If BOTW had established that Calamity Ganon once had understandable motives - or any kind of motives at all - then fine, but it doesn't. Any attempt to connect the different depictions of Ganon(dorf) is largely down to the fans: Nintendo tried out a timeline with SS but BOTW showed they're not that fussed about maintaining consistency.
A recent update on X said that they're interested in bringing an offline version to the west. Understandable, I guess.Meanwhile, still no idea when or if X will come over here in any form.
It's mostly just Aonuma trying to make his fanfiction timeline canon. Sure, there's the Dark Horse/Soleil books, but those are not objectively official.Their most recent explanation of BOTW on the timeline literally boiled down to "It's up to the player". The timeline has never been big on Nintendo's agenda and I always thought it was best just to take whatever they gave you and not worry about connecting all of the lines. Because they've made no way to connect them.
On your point on Ganondorf though...each timeline Ganondorf is slightly a different person because that's how timelines work. And as for calamity ganon, it's supposed to be tens of thousands of years later so I imagine he's supposed to be so separated from humanity and such.
According to Hyrule Historia, Vaati is the same individual in all three games; he developed amnesia after his defeat in Minish Cap.I mean, Ganon does have some dialogue in ALttP, for example, doesn't mean he's still the same Ganondorf that we knew from OoT.
What a conventional section.
This goes for most of these crappy cropped blurry image leaks, but seriously that's the least intresting part and the easiest to fake...
I hate Zelda's timeline, it's so forced.It's mostly just Aonuma trying to make his fanfiction timeline canon. Sure, there's the Dark Horse/Soleil books, but those are not objectively official.
*sigh* Don't remind me of Smash Ultimate's German ratingSuper Smash Bros. Ultimate is rated for 12 years in Germany. SSB64 on Wii as Melee on GameCube is rated for 6 years (what is closer to an E ranking from ESRB) Brawl and later are rated for 12 years. I have no idea which Valuation basis the USK is using. xD what is the diffrence between 64/Melee and Brawl/Smash4/Ultimate?
Is it because Snake?
No, because Smash 4 didn't have SnakeSuper Smash Bros. Ultimate is rated for 12 years in Germany. SSB64 on Wii as Melee on GameCube is rated for 6 years (what is closer to an E ranking from ESRB) Brawl and later are rated for 12 years. I have no idea which Valuation basis the USK is using. xD what is the diffrence between 64/Melee and Brawl/Smash4/Ultimate?
Is it because Snake?
I'm sorry for your regional loss.*sigh* Don't remind me of Smash Ultimate's German rating
Maybe because it had Zero Suit Samus.No, because Smash 4 didn't have Snake
I get that: it's just that, as you said, it's up to the fans. Ganondorf's corruption into Calamity Ganon is something we have to assume, not something that's explored much by BOTW. It helps make sense of the timeline and the character, but it probably wasn't something Nintendo really intended as their tendency to treat each Zelda game as its own story usually overrides their concerns re: the timeline. And that's fine: the only time the timeline has helped a story has been WW, where its basis in OOT gives it more poignancy.Their most recent explanation of BOTW on the timeline literally boiled down to "It's up to the player". The timeline has never been big on Nintendo's agenda and I always thought it was best just to take whatever they gave you and not worry about connecting all of the lines. Because they've made no way to connect them.
On your point on Ganondorf though...each timeline Ganondorf is slightly a different person because that's how timelines work. And as for calamity ganon, it's supposed to be tens of thousands of years later so I imagine he's supposed to be so separated from humanity and such.
That and also the fact that Zelda doesn't have a Hilda alt. Suspicious much?They said it's because "BotW Zelda is more into research anyways" but the real question you should be asking is why is it her Link Between Worlds appearance? Hmm.
Pretty sure Yoshi was removed to make room for Pikachu (He makes lotsa dough for Nintendo), as the USK logo is bigger than other rating board logos and would've blocked Pikachu in the original imageUSK was traumatized from last time.
Zinith : Jigglypuff and Captain Falcon from the first 12 are not on the cover, too.
I thought it was both a combination of the designs from ALttP and ALBW.That and also the fact that Zelda doesn't have a Hilda alt. Suspicious much?
It's still horse****. They could've worked around that without removing a single character...Pretty sure Yoshi was removed to make room for Pikachu (He makes lotsa douh for Nintendo), as the USK logo is bigger than other rating board logos and would've blocked Pikachu in the original image
If you like I can add you to the supporters list.I thought it was both a combination of the designs from ALttP and ALBW.
But, hey, Hilda would be a cool echo.