PsychoIncarnate
The Eternal Will of the Swarm
The box theory is more believable because it leaves a spot for the assumed character Ken. If it wasn't for that it'd be a lot easier to dismiss
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
About that DLC button, not that it makes too much difference. We have the tabs at the top of the stage window already. It’ll be separated by tabs. We already have a normal one. We would definitely get a DLC equivalent tab. No button necessary.The 108 could very well be a typo, but honestly it makes too much sense to me. It leaves a blanck spot for the DLC button as Smash For had, and on the website there is place for exactly 5 more stages
View attachment 164614
It might very well be a typo, but it woukd be the greatest coincidence in Smash speculation history TBH. If it was 113 or 133 that would have been clearly a typo, a finger slipped on the keyboards, but this is really strange and supspect to say the least.
And it surely helps the speculation going, which is always a positive.
Right or just mentionning it in the article itself but as far as i know, the 108 stages thing was treated as general info on the game. This seems a bit off...You’d think if they were aware that it was actually new information, they would have made a bigger deal about it for sales.
You're testing out how to be a top tier competitive melee player?Don't mind the Melee Fox displayed as my main, I'm testing something out...
Is it being a traitor?Don't mind the Melee Fox displayed as my main, I'm testing something out...
This, you can have new stages without new characters, examples like Pictochat and Hanenbow do exists. We've also have had franchises get representation through non-character means like Bomberman as an AT, so the possibility is there that those stages are not tied to newcomers and we have things like a Minecraft stage without a character to go along with it.Do I have to repeat myself?
You guys do know that Box theory and 108 stages don't have to contradict each other right?
You're testing out how to be a top tier competitive melee player?
I'm trying to see if my theory on one of this site's trophies is true...Is it being a traitor?
I know, but Smash For had both in fact:About that DLC button, not that it makes too much difference. We have the tabs at the top of the stage window already. It’ll be separated by tabs. We already have a normal one. We would definitely get a DLC equivalent tab. No button necessary.
View attachment 164615
You are right, I just checked it on my PC and it's completely glitched. My bad, I tought that design was for all versions sincce it looks crisp.Never use the website's layout as an excuse for x = y.
My layout looks completely different than yours due to my monitor's size. It adjusts to fit your native screen resolution.
For the box, it's due to both sides holding, at the current max due to the box size, 36 characters per side.I don’t even see why anyone makes these out to be more than they are. Correct me if I’m wrong but realistically, and traditionally, not every character has been on the box. The “Everyone is here!” might mean something. It easily could also just be the tag line for the game as opposed to the box.
I have no reason to assume we only have two characters left here.
Stages aren’t 1:1 with characters. Far from it actually. I don’t see why adding 5 stages destroys the already shaky box theory. I also don’t see why 5 stages is a big deal in the first place. We already have over one hundred. Realistically, 5 more should have no effect.
I have no reason to assume the 5 more stages means anything character wise. Both “theories” could be correct as far as I know. They don’t seem to contradict each other.
I gotta be missing something here. This whole discussion is either going way over my head or their has been some serious straw grasping going on recently.
Straw grasping is the favorite tactic of most Geno, Isaac and especially of late Shantae fans.I don’t even see why anyone makes these out to be more than they are. Correct me if I’m wrong but realistically, and traditionally, not every character has been on the box. The “Everyone is here!” might mean something. It easily could also just be the tag line for the game as opposed to the box.
I have no reason to assume we only have two characters left here.
Stages aren’t 1:1 with characters. Far from it actually. I don’t see why adding 5 stages destroys the already shaky box theory. I also don’t see why 5 stages is a big deal in the first place. We already have over one hundred. Realistically, 5 more should have no effect.
I have no reason to assume the 5 more stages means anything character wise. Both “theories” could be correct as far as I know. They don’t seem to contradict each other.
I gotta be missing something here. This whole discussion is either going way over my head or their has been some serious straw grasping going on recently.
Yeah I followed that much. I don’t understand the part where everyone is convinced that the box will 100% have all the characters on it. Has any game ever done that? Why is this box special?For the box, it's due to both sides holding, at the current max due to the box size, 36 characters per side.
Counting Miis and Pkmn trainer as 1, which the box does since we see Mii Fighters take up a space, that leaves two empty spots on the box.
We can tell that the side of the box we can't see is there's 35 characters on it, since we have the other 34 accounted for on the other side. Toss in Isabelle and bam.
70/72 spots on the box filled.
One side 'has' to be an Echo, which is why everyone jumps to Ken.
The biggest thing about 5 more stages is that it means that we could see fighters from new series rather than just the ones already present in Smash, because since Brawl every series with a fighter also had a stage, with the only exception being R.O.B. who being an real life item doesn't really appear in his games. Also even Melee would have had a Fire Emblem stage if it wasn't rushed.I don’t even see why anyone makes these out to be more than they are. Correct me if I’m wrong but realistically, and traditionally, not every character has been on the box. The “Everyone is here!” might mean something. It easily could also just be the tag line for the game as opposed to the box.
I have no reason to assume we only have two characters left here.
Stages aren’t 1:1 with characters. Far from it actually. I don’t see why adding 5 stages destroys the already shaky box theory. I also don’t see why 5 stages is a big deal in the first place. We already have over one hundred. Realistically, 5 more should have no effect.
I have no reason to assume the 5 more stages means anything character wise. Both “theories” could be correct as far as I know. They don’t seem to contradict each other.
I gotta be missing something here. This whole discussion is either going way over my head or their (I’n so tired I don’t remember which there I’m spose to use )has been some serious straw grasping going on recently.
Mostly because it'd be really odd to have every character up to #69 and whatever Echo has to be on the other side and to just 'stop'.Yeah I followed that much. I don’t understand the part where everyone is convinced that the box will 100% have all the characters on it. Has any game ever done that? Why is this box special?
Yeah its Smash Ultimate but its still just another Smash game. Why are we treating sone box as if its gospel? I don’t get it lmao. Maybe its true and I’m blind to reality but as far as I can tell there isn’t a reason to assume the box confirms only two more characters. There could easily just be characters not included on the box. xD
I dunno. Why’d they do a similar thing with Smash 4’s case? Is that not essentially the same thing?Mostly because it'd be really odd to have every character up to #69 and whatever Echo has to be on the other side and to just 'stop'.
Like, if there are other characters after #69, why wouldn't they be on the box if 1-69 are?
The thing is that if we were to get more old stages back, we would've already known by now. Not to mention, the stage list is listed chronologically (N64-Ultimate). If we were to get PokeFloats or Mute City from Melee back, Sakurai would've told us back in the August Direct when he "revealed all the stages". Why would he bring it up out of nowhere in some last Smash Direct or announcement that "Oh hey! I forgot to tell you guys back when I revealed all the stages that we have PokeFloats back!"?I don’t even see why anyone makes these out to be more than they are. Correct me if I’m wrong but realistically, and traditionally, not every character has been on the box. The “Everyone is here!” might mean something. It easily could also just be the tag line for the game as opposed to the box.
I have no reason to assume we only have two characters left here.
Stages aren’t 1:1 with characters. Far from it actually. I don’t see why adding 5 stages destroys the already shaky box theory. I also don’t see why 5 stages is a big deal in the first place. We already have over one hundred. Realistically, 5 more should have no effect.
I have no reason to assume the 5 more stages means anything character wise. Both “theories” could be correct as far as I know. They don’t seem to contradict each other.
I gotta be missing something here. This whole discussion is either going way over my head or their (I’n so tired I don’t remember which there I’m spose to use )has been some serious straw grasping going on recently.
This discussion is going way over my head AND there has been some serious straw grasping--those don't seem to contradict, at least for me.I don’t even see why anyone makes these out to be more than they are. Correct me if I’m wrong but realistically, and traditionally, not every character has been on the box. The “Everyone is here!” might mean something. It easily could also just be the tag line for the game as opposed to the box.
I have no reason to assume we only have two characters left here.
Stages aren’t 1:1 with characters. Far from it actually. I don’t see why adding 5 stages destroys the already shaky box theory. I also don’t see why 5 stages is a big deal in the first place. We already have over one hundred. Realistically, 5 more should have no effect.
I have no reason to assume the 5 more stages means anything character wise. Both “theories” could be correct as far as I know. They don’t seem to contradict each other.
I gotta be missing something here. This whole discussion is either going way over my head or their has been some serious straw grasping going on recently.
Fountain of Dreams being revealed in the August Direct signaled to me that we aren't getting any more returning stages for the base game. Why end with Pokefloats if you can end with Fountain of Dreams? (besides Pokefloats being objectively everyone's favorite stage)The thing is that if we were to get more old stages back, we would've already known by now. Not to mention, the stage list is listed chronologically (N64-Ultimate). If we were to get PokeFloats or Mute City from Melee back, Sakurai would've told us back in the August Direct when he "revealed all the stages". Why would he bring it up out of nowhere in some last Smash Direct or announcement that "Oh hey! I forgot to tell you guys back when I revealed all the stages that we have PokeFloats back!"?
That huge of a gap is too much of a gap even for Sakurai, and if one of the most prolific Japanese magazines says it's 108 - which has leaked many stuff in the past, then you gotta be hard-pressed, no?
No?I dunno. Why’d they do a similar thing with Smash 4’s case? Is that not essentially the same thing?
UnlessI don't think you know how many people check that everything is alright before printing a magazine, but such a typo is not that easy to make. It's not like writing fihgter instead of fighter, it's very hard to check the magazine and not see such a mistake, more so seeing how big the number appears.
No, it’s just a theory. You don’t need to look for an infallible reason to believe it because there isn’t one.Yeah I followed that much. I don’t understand the part where everyone is convinced that the box will 100% have all the characters on it. Has any game ever done that? Why is this box special?
Yeah its Smash Ultimate but its still just another Smash game. Why are we treating sone box as if its gospel? I don’t get it lmao. Maybe its true and I’m blind to reality but as far as I can tell there isn’t a reason to assume the box confirms only two more characters. There could easily just be characters not included on the box. xD
Everytime Zinith changes his main, a Yoshi is used as a free superjump down a pit.Okay, bare with me on the mains. I'm still a Yoshi main throughout. I just want to see if my theory is right...
Plus this makes it pretty clear they will eventually include all characters on their boxes.Mostly because it'd be really odd to have every character up to #69 and whatever Echo has to be on the other side and to just 'stop'.
Like, if there are other characters after #69, why wouldn't they be on the box if 1-69 are?
At first glance yes that's what the tabs will be for, however I feel like the "normal tab" thing is only there to show that your about to select the stage in it's "normal" form. Press a button and it will change to omega and battlefield modes respectively. Then again I could be wrong entirely. Is there any footage of this part of the game to back me up here?About that DLC button, not that it makes too much difference. We have the tabs at the top of the stage window already. It’ll be separated by tabs. We already have a normal one. We would definitely get a DLC equivalent tab. No button necessary.
View attachment 164615
I'm actually doing this for someone else. Believe me, I wouldn't try to do this otherwise...Everytime Zinith changes his main, a Yoshi is used as a free superjump down a pit.
You keep avoiding the fact that the box and its sides can easely be edited in order to add more characters. If there are 4/6 more characters they surely would not leave all those blanck spaces on a placeholder.No?
Like, imagine if Geno got revealed as character 70.
Why would they leave him out when literally every other character were on the box.
From a design standpoint, that makes zero sense if your goal is to showcase the entire roster on the box.
My very fist job in my life was actually making those mock-ups for several products. If you're interested, I can explain a bit on how (usually) works.
When you need a visual design for a product, be it a toy, a balm bottle, a keychain of whatever you first tell the graphic designer to do the first draft (my job). This is also the case for many boxes, especially for special editions. After the work is done, your supervisor check it and give the feedback: maybe is too dark for the target audience, maybe the colors are off, maybe you idea sucks, and so on.
Now keep in mind that at this moment the image is still a photoshopped image, not a 3D render (most of the time; I'm talking about my personal experience), and in rare cases those photoshopped images end to be the actual "official" one. Like this one (look at the toilet paper), as opposed to this one. See the difference?
Once the supervisor gives the ok, the process proceed. Remember this part for later.
Then, in the case of a product box, it goes straight to a specific department that make the actual box. I said specific because they are responsible for basically everything regarding the actual box: the colors (if you're familiar with RGB vs CMYK you know what I mean), font dimension (very important if the wording need to be translated), all the box sides, and all those fine prints you see on every box. In this stage the intern can actually make some changes, especially true if you consider that most companies always have some kind of "template" regarding their products. Just grab any box near you and you'll see with your own eyes: the prints, the warnings, the logos, the alignment. There are actual people who specifically work on those, in order to have a good looking AND functional product.
After all that, it usually got double-checked and finally released to the public (and to the physical manufactor). Remember, this process takes place AFTER the actual product is done (or at least should be).
Before proceeding, keep in mind that I worked in a small company and not in a huge multinational, and basically never in a NDA environment. So from now take everything with a grain of salt.
Now, from my personal experience, on this "box theory" I can tell you this. The Smash Bros Special Edition Box is real, like an actual physical box that has been sent to Amazon, along with a specific serial number (and tons of paperwork) in order to be and actual buyable product. Remember that the ESBR already have the final version of the game with all the characters in it, its basically already finished.
But that box is a placeholder. "Hurr-dur, of course its a placeholder, Isabelle is not on it!". And that's the point.
Remember the supervisor stage? In this particular case, the team already know the full rooster but they get specifically instructed about what characters are going to be revealed to the public, so its up to the supervisor to tell "put all the characters up to the 67°, we are going to send this before the planned 5th september direct" or something like that to the poor intern, so he (and later the box department) have to create a desing with those instructions in place.
If you consider that the Steelbox was already announced back in august (look at the date), I think its pretty safe to assume that whoever created that box was specifically instructed on how many characters he was supposed to show. So the empty slots are there for a reason, they are not random.
Its interesting to note the discrepancy in the Palutena-Corrin segment, from my point of view it could really be a slip up of an echo fighter there (Ken/Medusa/Ms. Pacman/Zack...), I mean, it wouldn't be the first time Nintendo screw up like this. But regarding the supposed single remaining slot, I'm pretty confident its a placeholder. As in, the entire grid might change, shrunk, moved, some characters may be on the back and so on.
That said, don't expect 5-6 more unique anyways, Sakurai specifically told us the opposite. There are probably 2 more left, 3 if you want to be optimistic.
Hope it helped.
TL;DR: 90% placeholder, 10% true.
I agree. I’d say us getting 5 more stages is probably the case. I don’t understand why that has anything to do with the box theory though.The thing is that if we were to get more old stages back, we would've already known by now. Not to mention, the stage list is listed chronologically (N64-Ultimate). If we were to get PokeFloats or Mute City from Melee back, Sakurai would've told us back in the August Direct when he "revealed all the stages". Why would he bring it up out of nowhere in some last Smash Direct or announcement that "Oh hey! I forgot to tell you guys back when I revealed all the stages that we have PokeFloats back!"?
That huge of a gap is too much of a gap even for Sakurai, and if one of the most prolific Japanese magazines says it's 108 - which has leaked many stuff in the past, then you gotta be hard-pressed, no?
Why is that different though? “Why did Smash 4’s case include several newcomers but not the rest?”No?
Like, imagine if Geno got revealed as character 70.
Why would they leave him out when literally every other character were on the box.
From a design standpoint, that makes zero sense if your goal is to showcase the entire roster on the box.
Or throws yet another unborn child.Everytime Zinith changes his main, a Yoshi is used as a free superjump down a pit.
I'VE NOT ADANDONED YOSHI FOR CHRISTS SAKE!!! I don't even like playing as the characters displayed. This is for science, and I'll revert back to Yoshi very soon...Or throws yet another unborn child.
Because the entire roster is going to be shown before launch.I agree. I’d say us getting 5 more stages is probably the case. I don’t understand why that has anything to do with the box theory though.
Why is that different though? “Why did Smash 4’s case include several cgaracters but not the rest?”
Maybe they aren’t trying to show the entire roster on the box? DLC is gonna come too most likely. Sooner or later the box is gonna have an incomplete list of characters anyway. I’ve got no reason to assume it won’t be sooner.
I feel like I’m being difficult but I really don’t get it.
Admit it, you're just extremely optimistic Yoshi will be Top Tier in Ultimate.I'VE NOT ADANDONED YOSHI FOR CHRISTS SAKE!!! I don't even like playing as the characters displayed. This is for science, and I'll revert back to Yoshi very soon...
I am, but what I'm doing has NOTHING to do with that...Admit it, you're just extremely optimistic Yoshi will be Top Tier in Ultimate.
It also doesn’t make much sense from a marketing standpoint to have two characters to show off for the next 3 months of wait time after showing off multiple in the first Direct, yet here we seem to be.Because the entire roster is going to be shown before launch.
It makes zero sense from a design standpoint to have every character except like, 2-3. We aren't going to have anyone secret by the time the game comes out, so 'hidden characters' isn't an excuse like 4 was.