Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, I don't want an argument to start. I wasn't offended or mislead at all. I thought maybe Arigarmi was unaware of where he came from like me. I figured Luigi The President's post was the correct one given that I've seen Black Knight associated with Ike before. I was mainly curious about which Tellius game he came from, as I knew Ike had two.
Now that you mention all that you're sadly right. I think Taunt parties are good fun in moderation but I do wish there was a way for them to co-exist with people who want to play the game. It does suck that For Fun probably has to serve that purpose but it makes sense why when you mention it.
Are we talking gameplay or design?
Yeah, that was a few pages back...
Oh no, the ahoge they added and general "animeification" of Shulk's design is pretty awful.
Wasn't here a few pages back unfortunately, mind catching me up on this?
See, that's why I support keeping that stuff in private matches with friends. I do agree it's kinda lame to do with randoms online.
I actually thought it was good idea if we wanted to incorporate all of the Monado arts into one, which makes sense for Speed and Shield. I would've gone with Monado Cyclone but Air Slash was an equally smart idea. Back Slash is obviously the Side Special. Down special is really anything goes, but a counter is expected from a sword wielder.
Like, Sakurai, does realise that Monado Enchant is a thing right? I mean, it's one of the 2 arts you get in the beginning of the game.
No, what happened?
I think Shulk is fine as he is in Smash Bros. No need to be too complex.
This really makes me want a remake of Xenoblade Chronicles on the Xenoblade Chronicles 2 engine.
To be fair what the **** are you gonna do with Monado Enchant? I'm more disturbed with the fact that the way he uses the Monado in the game isn't like how he does it in XC1.
It'd probably get anime-ified if it's a remake instead of being one of the 3D Zelda rereleases. I think the XC2 design is gonna stick because that game sold like hotcakes and if it ain't broke don't fix it.
Dee has no mouth, so I don't think Kirby's VA would be violating anything NDA by saying this or anything.
As far as Daisy goes, they dont do music for a series if it has another character. So Dark Samus wont have a track because the Ridley one was already added. I guess you could say this helps Skull Kid since Zelda would have already had one (though I think people also overstate Skull Kid's chances). Again, this is just in the confines of this theory. It could just be wrong,The song theory is interesting, but I don't like it. Namely since it implies that we're not getting a Zelda character again.
Then again, there are several franchises that have a new remix in their character trailers:
Now
but it seems weird that we're not getting a new Mario Land (or any Mario) remixes. True, they could be saving that for another Mario newcomer.
Again, my issue is that this theory implies preexisting Zelda song = no Zelda newcomer, but the song they did put up is a remix from BotW, which they used to show off the Great Plateau stage (remember that New Donk was not in the demo build). Thus, there could be a Zelda newcomer, probably not a BotW one. If we assume Skull Kid, then they may just not put up his song. But then again, Fire Emblem was represented by Heroes, which has little to do with
Just a few thoughts. I'm more in the camp that they're not expressly planning to do a song for each newcomer, but it makes sense as long as it fits. Still, they'll shy away from doubling series on the music page. Thus, I don't think an existing track disconfirms a newcomer from a series, but a newcomer from any series that has an existing track probably won't get a new remix up.
I'd argue Idon's suggestions are more simple than what we have in Smash.
The current “rule” right now is that a chracater has to be popular to get in. I think we’d get a slight mix of both, I still see characters like Isaac and Geno get in because they were very popular because of the ballot, but I also see characters like Elma and a Gen 7 Pokémon getting in because they can add something unique to the roster that Sakurai might find it worth spending on.I just realized something.
I know we consider a retro NES rep to be a tradition for each Smash game, but when you think about it, Simon kinda already fills that spot, especially using his NES design and how faithful he is to the original games.
Food for thought, I suppose. My idea probably doesn't work anyway, as Duck Hunt still got in after Mega Man, who like Simon, is super inspired by his NES design.
I wonder, though: We're all speculating based off of old ideas and patterns, but I almost wonder if we're all way more off the mark than we realize. Nearly every supposed rule and tradition that we as fans seem to think Smash HAD to adhere to has been broken with Ultimate, so I wonder if the people thinking there doesn't necessarily have to be a Pokemon newcomer or new retro/random character might be on to something. I'm probably wrong in thinking this, but eh, it's an interesting idea.
I meant using Monado enchant as a "damage buff" like what buster is in Smash. And then you could put Buster as "Smash" instead of making an entirely new art up.To be fair what the **** are you gonna do with Monado enchant? I'm more disturbed with the fact that the way he uses the Monado in the game isn't like how he does it in XC1.
It's not necessarily wrong, but it just feels weird.
The thing is, Kirby doesn't speak when copying Link or Mario for example, so him not having a voice (despite that one song) doesn't mean too much here.
I'm sorry my friend, can't really tell if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me here. What I'm trying to say is I wouldn't look deep into it at all just because there's no real reason for her to know.
Idk man, I hadn’t seen one leak/wishlist with richter on it prior and this was post verges simon leak with actual credibility. If I recall correctly he just said richter was the castlevania newcomer because that’s what he saw in the data and never said Simon wasn’t happening and assumed he would be the castlevania rep as a result. Also the leak called for King K. Rool and dark Samus who were also revealed in the same direct although these were easier guesses they were still hits.
Yeah, I'm agreeing. Just wanted to note something interesting.
Nah he plain out said Simon isn't in. He may have reclarified in a later post, though. But also...didn't he literally steal the Switch from CEO? Or how did he get the "data"?
Oof, I don't know if I could stomach a remake if Shulk looked like how he does in XB2.
I don't know if I could stomach Metal Face in XC2 design.
Why does Smash terms have to take priority than your own series that you're supposed to represent in your own moveset?
One with Kamek would be neat (Yoshi). Also Scribblenauts if you feel like it.
Why not? People argue against it but they can't really disprove that it's plausible to do. We gotta get out of our comfort zone sometimes.
How long does it take until you realize Shulk is pretty much an alien?
I've said this before, but Vision should've functioned like Diavolo's time erasure counter in All-Star Battle. If Shulk's hit, his enemy is frozen for a short period or until Shulk does any attack, then time resumes. It would allow him to retaliate with anything, but with his crap frame data, he'd be unable to get a smash off of a countered jab for example. This would also reference how time freezes when you warn another party member about the vision, and reference the ability to choose any one of their arts. It would also make aerial Vision have a point.
I mean, I know the concept wasn't the same back then, but Ganondorf was essentially born from Captain Falcon (and yeah I went with the weirdest wording on purpose.)
I mean, consider that Sakurai is a Fire Emblem fan, yet gives it dull stages and doesn't get some of the character personalities right. He's pretty much like people that, while they're experts on some topics (e.g. Game & Watch in Sakurai's case), on others they only know about it on a surface level, but try to be in depth about it anyway.
Yeah, but like... give me the underdogs though...
