That's a baseless claim, we know nothing of the ballot results.[ballot]
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That's a baseless claim, we know nothing of the ballot results.[ballot]
...I know. Is that still any reason to discount him or any older characters? No, it's not.Well outside of the reference in Tropical Freeze and the Mii Costume it's been a decade since K.Rool appeared. And that was in a Mario sports spinoff
Anyone can pick up a NES controller and make it to 1-4. It's a fake Bowser, but it's still Bowser.K. Rool's most recent source of media was the references made in both Smash Bros and TF, with one being an entire costume based on the character. He is most definitely not unlikely.
The niche argument falls flat when characters like Ice Climbers were added, and if we want to use not coming in until the finale as an excuse, why is Bowser and why was Bowser considered the most iconic villain in gaming when most of his portrayals have him show up as the final boss only in the main games and people constantly butcher his name as "Browser"?
I don't think we should write him off for pure conjecture like that. He may not be the most recognized character, but for the people who have played the older games. he's a nostalgic, insane goofball.
Not really a baseless claim.That's a baseless claim, we know nothing of the ballot results.
So what are you saying?I know I'm repeating myself, but this is K.Rool's issue.
Outside of DK64, he NEVER shows himself to the player until the very end of the game, which makes it hard for the player to identify him as "Oh, he's the guy I need to beat up."
The best villains in Smash always show up constantly to remind the player that "Hey, I'm your roadblock, I don't like you, your mom's smelly."
By constantly showing you the bad guy, it helps the player realize "Oh, this is who I need to beat up. This is my bad guy."
Even Ridley shows up super early in Super Metroid to help give you a motivation as to what you need to do.
K.Rool's issue is because he's never really been anything but "The shadowy mastermind behind it all that you see at the end", he's never really cemented himself in the general gamer's consciousness as "The DK villain."
a. There is no "hardware" character. That's another fan-made pattern.Mach Rider the fact he/she was an old toy in the 70s even points to him/her being sort of our next game and watch / R.O.B. / Wii Fit Trainer / duck hunt (with the zapper) "hardware" character too.
no it didn'tIt's pretty telling to me that production on Smash Ultimate started before the Smash 4 DLC was even finished.
The first proposal was completed in December 2015, back while we were still working on DLC for the previous title. It wasn’t until later that I assembled a team and began development on this new title in earnest.
As much as I hate to say it, actually kind of.So what are you saying?
That Lord Fredrik did a better job at that by visibly being seen in the opening cinematic for Tropical Freeze (though obscured by shadow) and clearly being the one that set the events in motion?
a. There is no "hardware" character. That's another fan-made pattern.
b. The "Mach Rider" toy has absolutely NOTHING to do with the "Mach Rider" game. It also wasn't even a Nintendo creation; the toy was made by Hasbro and only LISENCED to Nintendo for distribution within Japan.
Seems legit'High Level' Gaming Icons IRL: PAC-MAN, Mario, Donkey Kong, Sonic, Pikachu, (possibly) Charizard
"Lower Level" Gaming Icons IRL: Luigi, Peach (/Daisy), Bowser, Yoshi, Link (possibly as "Zelda"), Tails, Dr. Robotnik, Megaman, Cloud, Snake, Lara Croft, Master Chief, "That guy from Minecraft"
"Meme Level" Gaming Icons (related solely to Smash): Marth, Roy
Gaming Icons according to Smash Fans: King K. Rool, Ridley, Isaac... etc.
To propose something one needs to know the contents of something friend.no it didn't
sakurai finished the first project proposal, production likely didn't start until early-mid 2016 after dlc was over.
Development is one phase of production. Pre-production is the first phase. And yes, it started before the DLC was finished.no it didn't
sakurai finished the first project proposal, production likely didn't start until early-mid 2016 after dlc was over.
While I agree entirely on your latter point (Mach Rider as a toy was separate from the game Mach Rider), would you agree with me that legacy/historical retro characters are a thing? I don't consider them to be representative of hardware, but Game and Watch, R.O.B., and Duck Hunt are absolutely an established type of newcomer. Hell, I have a quote from Sakurai on that if you want.a. There is no "hardware" character. That's another fan-made pattern.
b. The "Mach Rider" toy has absolutely NOTHING to do with the "Mach Rider" game. It also wasn't even a Nintendo creation; the toy was made by Hasbro and only LISENCED to Nintendo for distribution within Japan.
you know K.Rool are in other game too?As much as I hate to say it, actually kind of.
By giving the player an idea of just who they need to beat up, it gives them a motivation to continue.
The best kind of villains are the ones that are reminding you that they exist and they're a threat, not the ones who only appear at the end and claim "IT WAS ME THE WHOLE TIME!"
This is partially why Ganondorf doesn't work in Twilight Princess.
Zant was a fine villain, but then you basically threw him away to be "Aha, but it was GANON this entire time!"
I didn't care about Bayonetta though You're flexing so hard for no reason, chill out. We don't know who the ballot winner was, and we can't just assume or make good guesses about who won the ballot. You're forgetting that Shrek could've easily won for memesake, but just because he could've won doesn't mean he would've regardless of if he topped.Not really a baseless claim.
But okay.
Okay.
We don't need to know the results to understand who might have done well and who didn't.
Ya'll just slept on how popular Bayonetta was within the Nintendo world despite people like me going ''She's coming to Smash sooner or later." even pre-DLC and now ya'll act stunned by the fact she beat people who were apparently kicking *** and taking names in the ballot.
But that doesn't negate it's not hard to have opened your eyes and looked around and saw who was in demand at the time of the Smash 4 DLC wrapping and Smash Ultimate beginning and how THREE of them are already confirmed newcomers.
It's kinda like people think Sakurai farted every idea he had about Smash Ultimate out right there in the proposal and didn't plot and plan anything before that.Development is one phase of production. Pre-production is the first phase. And yes, it started before the DLC was finished.
Glad to see this. I really hope Sakurai and his team take notice of the hype around the characters they did add instead of focusing on the negativity.
I doubt votes for Shrek and Goku were even counted. So when people bring this up I just laugh. It's the ultimate conspiracy theory against Bayonetta. Even when given proof of his claims of her popularity in Europe and how she was top 5 elsewhere, etc, etc.I didn't care about Bayonetta though You're flexing so hard for no reason, chill out. We don't know who the ballot winner was, and we can't just assume or make good guesses about who won the ballot. You're forgetting that Shrek could've easily won for memesake, but just because he could've won doesn't mean he would've regardless of if he topped.
And Squawks and Tiny Kong.He is big enough to have a street named with his name in a BIG mario game. alongside DK DIXIE DIDDY CRANKY.
Gives me some major flashbacks to Star Fox Adventures final boss tooAs much as I hate to say it, actually kind of.
By giving the player an idea of just who they need to beat up, it gives them a motivation to continue.
The best kind of villains are the ones that are reminding you that they exist and they're a threat, not the ones who only appear at the end and claim "IT WAS ME THE WHOLE TIME!"
This is partially why Ganondorf doesn't work in Twilight Princess.
Zant was a fine villain, but then you basically threw him away to be "Aha, but it was GANON this entire time!"
A Street named in Odyssey is a throwaway reference at best. He had a rock formation in Tropical Freeze, but that doesn't make him anymore relevant.you know K.Rool are in other game too?
king of swing / Jungle clibmer was not so popular but fun game and he show up a lot more.
He is big enough to have a street named with his name in a BIG mario game. alongside DK DIXIE DIDDY CRANKY.
HE IS the BOWSER of DK. even smash trophy said so..
**** you talking about Willis? I'm just saying we shouldn't assume a full list until Nintendo themselves reveals it or it just stays in the abyss of the unknown.You still think he lied about the rest of what he said about her just to put her in over other characters or meme characters.
So what are you saying?
That Lord Fredrik did a better job at that by visibly being seen in the opening cinematic for Tropical Freeze (though obscured by shadow) and clearly being the one that set the events in motion?
a. There is no "hardware" character. That's another fan-made pattern.
b. The "Mach Rider" toy has absolutely NOTHING to do with the "Mach Rider" game. It also wasn't even a Nintendo creation; the toy was made by Hasbro and only LISENCED to Nintendo for distribution within Japan.
Very good points across the board, although I am hoping for you guys to get him back in the main series proper someday.A Street named in Odyssey is a throwaway reference at best. He had a rock formation in Tropical Freeze, but that doesn't make him anymore relevant.
The fact of the matter is, his last appearance was a Mario Sports game, he's been MIA for ten years.
I'm a K.Rool fan, but I'm also not blind to see that he's been cast aside.
It's entirely possible that when Sakurai said Bayonetta was the top "realisable" character, it was either:I'm pretty sure one of the reasons why Bayonetta was chosen for Smash 4 DLC over others was that they wanted to save some of their big guns for Smash 5. We still don't know a lot of the top picks, especially in the US.
This is why I never thought Inklings would make it at the time.
Well Sonic Mania is made by hardcore Sonic fans who earned SEGA's trust with fangames. Mighty is incredibly popular in the hardcore fan game/hack communityVery good points across the board, although I am hoping for you guys to get him back in the main series proper someday.
We're getting Mighty and Ray back in Sonic Mania+ so I think anything is possible for the future! Different situations entirely but you gotta keep that hope up.
Yeah, I suppose it's a bit early for her, the remaining Mario slots are probably taken for this installment anyway. The arguments in favor of Tingle make no sense, since he acts as a PLATFORM, which is kind of important in a stage.One thing on background characters not confirming newcomers. I don't believe this. The only example we have was Toon Link and he was a veteran. Smash loves to make big reveals of it's newcomers and has never revealed a newcomer before their official reveal.
For me Pauline & Tingle are out of the running.
Big enough to have a super small cameo in a game doesn't sound "big enough" at all. That kinda makes him sound super irrelevant.you know K.Rool are in other game too?
king of swing / Jungle clibmer was not so popular but fun game and he show up a lot more.
He is big enough to have a street named with his name in a BIG mario game. alongside DK DIXIE DIDDY CRANKY.
HE IS the BOWSER of DK. even smash trophy said so..
I want everyone to have a unique victory theme but dreams are dreams I guess.Do you think Victory themes are gonna stick back to the old Brawl ones or do you think they'll retouch them this time around?I honestly preferred the Melee Mother one compared to the new one.
Judging by the project plan's timing, probably.Does the Smash Ballot have any influence on Sakurai's decision with the roster for Ultimate?
Trust me, I WANT K.Rool in, but Nintendo apparently doesn't want him in any DK stuff anymore.I can't wait till K. Rool gets in and everyone says "b-but he's not been in any r-recent games?!? How?! Where is R-Rayman?"
I mean, I used tk supprt K.Rool but am now indifferent, though a close friend of mine loves DKC so I'll be happy for him that he gets his Ridley reveal, I caused noise complaints at that revealI can't wait till K. Rool gets in and everyone says "b-but he's not been in any r-recent games?!? How?! Where is R-Rayman?"
I would agree, though I also feel it's sort of coincidence since the three are established as "surprise characters" foremost. We don't yet know the full scope of what it means to be one aside from simply being kept as much of a secret as possible until release and people unlock them, but coincidentally all three have historic value and come from the NES era or earlier.While I agree entirely on your latter point (Mach Rider as a toy was separate from the game Mach Rider), would you agree with me that legacy/historical retro characters are a thing? I don't consider them to be representative of hardware, but Game and Watch, R.O.B., and Duck Hunt are absolutely an established type of newcomer. Hell, I have a quote from Sakurai on that if you want.
These are likely possibilities too. Really we know very little about the ballot's results so everything is conjecture and theory.It's entirely possible that when Sakurai said Bayonetta was the top "realisable" character, it was either:
a) They were specifically looking for Third Party characters to use as the Final DLC, so First Party character's are not "realisable" by that metric.
b) The top scorers were "4th party" characters like Goku, Superman and Shrek, so they're not "realisable". And Bayonetta was the top scorer beneath those guys.