No new characters?Bowser
Ganondorf
peach
zelda/sheik
how great would it be to see ganondorf in his OoT look in smash!
That's it?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No new characters?Bowser
Ganondorf
peach
zelda/sheik
how great would it be to see ganondorf in his OoT look in smash!
good point, but brawl and melee just have too many characters.No, what you failed to understand is that people like smash 64 for the game it is. Sure there are broken moves, but going back to the game and fixing it is going to change the way the game plays, and not everyone wants that.
What you said was you wanted them to go back to the game and balance the characters, while improving the graphics. Well, they basically did that with melee and then brawl. So why bother "HD remixing" when you already have 2 sequels of better graphics and mechanics. So yea, read closely to what I was saying.
Just stating my opinion, just like you did, but apparently you couldn't handle the criticism so you find yourself having to shoot down mine.
Again, read what I was saying. I was talking about only remodeling the stages, not the characters. The polygon-like character's is what makes the game more fun/nostalgic in my opinion. They only use enough polygons to get the general idea, leaving more to the imagination, and that's what makes n64 great, they generalized a lot of the graphics based off the limited software capabilities and still managed to make great games while today it's mostly about how pretty the graphics look. So, i was basically saying keep the old school feel of the polygon characters and incorporate some of the new age technology on the stages, balancing old with new. Just an opinion though, sorry you can't handle it.
Don't let your ego get to you. You obviously couldn't handle that I criticized your idea so you went ahead and nitpicked everything I said to say something witty and snide as a counter. They you used the final blow of the join date for the feeling of utmost greatest satisfaction and accomplishment. It doesn't bother me though, because I'm not the one making myself look like the idiot right now. If you've got something to say in return, feel free, but I'm not going to respond if I get a similar response as before. Besides, I even said your idea was cool, so I have no idea why you blew up about it
I agree that Banjo-kazooie would have fitted, the theme was strictly nintendo at the time, but banjo-kazooie was a Rare Game. They only put two third-party characters in brawl, and Masihiro sakurai, I think, wanted to have it just nintendo. But he couldn't be in one if the remade it, like you said they're with microsof now. (Donkey Kong 64 is my favourite game on any system D: )Keeping in mind when this came out, and what was popular then, I would think the following characters would be added.
One, Banjo-Kazooie. His games were always extremely popular. Still are, and the rights weren't to Microsoft back then.
Two, Little Mac. His games were really popular on the Super NES.
Both would have made a lot of sense in my opinion.
Ness, Falcon and Jiggly obvious? (I know puff was like the second most popular pokemon in japan but still)I agree that Banjo-kazooie would have fitted, the theme was strictly nintendo at the time, but banjo-kazooie was a Rare Game. They only put two third-party characters in brawl, and Masihiro sakurai, I think, wanted to have it just nintendo. But he couldn't be in one if the remade it, like you said they're with microsof now. (Donkey Kong 64 is my favourite game on any system D: )
As for Little mac, I'm not really sure, Only very obvious characters got in Smash 64, and I wouldn't think Little mac is obvious.
Yes, I wasn't saying f-zero wasn't popular, it's just that falcon doesn't really seem like a main character in F-zero (there's not to much story, really).Earthbound and F-zero are extremely popular and both have quite an abundant fanbase each, and I am part of both.
He is the more rounded character out of the starters.Yes, I wasn't saying f-zero wasn't popular, it's just that falcon doesn't really seem like a main character in F-zero (there's not to much story, really).
plus, he is always the one in the front when they show all the characters and has his helmet appear a lot on the f-zero x menu screens, and in recent games, there is a story and it revolves around him.Yes, I wasn't saying f-zero wasn't popular, it's just that falcon doesn't really seem like a main character in F-zero (there's not to much story, really).
...try pressing c up more lightly.C-buttons to shorthop. You cannot shorthop with "up" on keyboard.
He meant the 'up' key for jabbing the control stick....try pressing c up more lightly.
If you have project 64 Battlefield is in there it just looks a little differentBut what about STAGES? Smash64 needed an F-Zero stage, and needed to make Battlefield and FD playable.
+why not some more chars?the only things that could make ssb64 better with it staying ssb64 are better graphics and more stages
imo
+why not some more chars?
+nerfing top tiers a bit and/or improving low tiers a bit.
Yea but wouldn't adding stages do it too, like if they added several legal stages that played much differently, eg less gimping so matchups changed.then that wont be ssb64
there should be absolutely no changes to the matchup chart
both of what you stated would change it
Who said ssb64 is perfect? Why not try to improve it by balancing the chars even more? At least, change some obvious stuff like the horrible Link and Ness recoveries, or nerf kirby's utilt, for example.then that wont be ssb64
there should be absolutely no changes to the matchup chart
both of what you stated would change it
I agree, with one complaint in particular: fix Pikachu's FSmash. Has anyone here looked at a diagram of the hitbox on it? I had the fortune to find one once: it barely relates to the attack itself at all.I'd say the best improvement for ssb64 would be improving the recoveries in general, I think edgeguarding in this game is a bit too easy.
You should really quote people when you say things like that, so we know who made the accusation.How would adding more characters hurt a game, considering you change nothing else besides maybe add a stage or 2
it's not a perfect game but heck, i don't want a perfect game, i want ssb64.
It wouldn't but if the new character was too good it could mess up the game's balance. Of course you could decide to ban the new character but there are HUGE fights over that, as we saw with Metaknight.How would adding more characters hurt a game, considering you change nothing else besides maybe add a stage or 2
Dude! Where did you find it? I've been trying to look for hitboxes in this game for years!!I agree, with one complaint in particular: fix Pikachu's FSmash. Has anyone here looked at a diagram of the hitbox on it? I had the fortune to find one once: it barely relates to the attack itself at all.
If I remembered, I would have linked it to yeh. Sorry.Dude! Where did you find it [the hitbox diagram]? I've been trying to look for hitboxes in this game for years!!