Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, I was kinda thinking the Triforce would let out some kind of energy that would disintegrate Demise......or something like that. Also, so since Zelda is Hylia, is every single Zelda that comes after her technically Hylia as well except each Zelda has no knowledge that she is Hylia?Speaking of the triforce, I've said this before - I find that the idea of granting wishes is more powerful than when it does grant the wishes. What I'm trying to say is maybe it's not as powerful as the myth has you believe. Take a look at the course of action taken when Link finally acquires it - drops the mother****ing island on Demise. If it was as powerful as it is in legend, it should have done it without having to do that. Basically, Demise should have just disappeared.
I'm impressed. But I think they'll continue with the 3 goddesses. But there now is an extra Goddess added... What kinda role will she (Hylia) have in the series?? Will she just not be mentioned, or will she, in a different fashion where Zelda has to remember her powers / memories of old yet again? This alone makes me wanna have a game combined with the elements of Skyward Sword and Ocarina of Time. Also in between the time lines of both games,mand also featuring time travelling between Young and Adult Link. Sounds lame! Well, I'd take lame over more creativitiy at this point. Safe that for Mario.I've been kicking around the idea of Zelda atheism for a while now but I think I'm going to finally come out and say it
The triforce isn't magical, it's a piece of technology
Do you say this because of Zelda's history of making prequels to every game, or because you have a strong hunch, or is it something else? I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just curious.I think they'll only incorporate the goddess in the SS prequel (yes, there will be a prequel) and any games taking place in early Hyrule (pre-MC time).
Lol, they keep going farther back.The reason I'm saying there will be a prequel is because in OoT and TP, they mentioned this hero of old. SS comes and turns out to be the hero of old. Then in SS, we hear of an OLDER hero of old. That's just where I'm getting it from.
Zelda Wiki said:The ceremony takes place on the hands of the Statue of the Goddess. During the ceremony, Zelda plays the role of the Goddess Hylia and Link, the winner, plays the role of the of the Goddess's Hero. Zelda gives Link the Sailcloth as a prize which symbolizes the sailcloth that the Goddess gave to the Hero. At the conclusion of the ceremony, the Hero is supposed to dive off the statue and land inside a circle on the ground. However, instead of Link jumping off, Zelda pushes Link off of the statue.
This would be a good question to ask one of the mailbags on the Zelda sitesKinda makes me wonder if that was an unresolved thread that they forgot to change, it contradicts Demises statement that back in the Goddesses time no human would stand against him
If that happened, it would need to be before the earliest time when SS Link went back in time, or it would cause some plot issues, mainly Impa having selective amnesia.Ohhh that. Yeah, makes sense then.
Also, what if we would get a game in between the time traveling between the ancient past and recent time in Skyward Sword? I think it could work. Characters from Skyward Sword itself could make appearances to, most likely Impa, the Imprisoned and maybe even Ghirahim, or his evil twin? Remember, Ganon had two swords in OOT after all.
I agree with this, we don't need a 4th branch of the timeline to make it look more messy.3 time lines is already more than I wanted. Although I'm sure some 15 years down the road they'll make a fourth due to laziness of making things connect.
Because not all games should have to have a connection to older games as OOT>WW, OOT>MM>TP just because they where there before. I don't' expect much more fanservice regarding to story elements to that. Nintendo isn't like that. They make a Zelda game, and then make it fit in somewhere in the timeline. Not the other way around. They even said themselves that it would be a lot easier for them if the fans would just say: We don't care about timelines, just gimme new Zelda games. (more or less)But......why?
This is the way the games are created. A timeline was only released to appease spergy nerds. It's extremely obvious how little thought the storywriters put into the interconnectedness of the games even on a basic literal plot level whenever you play any of them.Are you trying to suggest there SHOULDN'T be an attempted coherent timeline?
Well yeah, but we're at a point now where we know there's an established storyline. So if they were to just go against that, it'd be ridiculous.This is the way the games are created. A timeline was only released to appease spergy nerds. It's extremely obvious how little thought the storywriters put into the interconnectedness of the games even on a basic literal plot level whenever you play any of them.
Hell, it's one of the biggest appeals of the series for me, personally.
If Skyward Sword is the best they can do outside of direct sequels like Majoras Mask and Phantom Hourglass, yes. Most definitely. Even MM->TP doesn't make that much sense. I'd just rather have them do an attempt to start over.Are you trying to suggest there SHOULDN'T be an attempted coherent timeline?