Do female gamers have a hard time in the generally "male dominated" gaming space? Yep.
Should more people be talking about it? Yeah, we should.
Should we do female-only tournaments to raise awareness? Depends on why we're doing it.
I'm for it just to give female players a "potential stress free" venue to enjoy playing the game. Sure, whatever, knock yourself out.
I'm against it as an official, reoccuring event for the sake of increasing diversity, because it isn't solving or addressing any issue. We already know that plenty of women play smash, we already know half of gaming is female. (YES, half of gaming is female. Your personal definition of "gamer" is irrelevant.) The issue isn't getting them to play, the issue is letting them feel like they belong in the same space simultaneously. The idea that we can only help the issue by creating a nice little bubble where we remove ourselves from the equation isn't helping anything long-term, and just goes to show how crappy the issue is.
Elaboration:
TL;DR large physical sports have never actually tried to include females, because none of them have actually sacrificed any parts of their rulesets that would allow not only women but people in general to have a completely fair shot to begin with. With women it's a bit more egregious and so the easiest step down is just to create a seperate, "JV" league for them to compete in.
Esports though is completely different. Any data regarding reaction times discrepancy is a complete wash, such a thing depends entirely on what you have trained your body and mind to do. We're talking about nerves here, there is no gender difference. The issue women have with esports and gaming is that the community is just inherently hostile towards them, sometimes intentionally, most of the time subconsciously.
You've got the clear major offenders ("you lost to a girl", *joke with kitchen punchline*), you've got the minor, subconscious offenders ("You're good for a girl", *insert obnoxious flirt attempt here*), and you've got the people who just exacerbate all the other issues by either laughing from the sidelines, watching it happen without calling it out, or simply assert that it isn't a problem at all (THE worst of all. If this is you, shut up, you make everything worse).
The girls can tough it out and deal with it, but it's going to have to be a change on the men's end to actually make any real progress. You can have "female only" tournaments and get a good turnout, and yeah it probably will ultimately help the tournament scene at large. But what people should be aiming for is the ability to not have females be turned away from general events at all.
Should more people be talking about it? Yeah, we should.
Should we do female-only tournaments to raise awareness? Depends on why we're doing it.
I'm for it just to give female players a "potential stress free" venue to enjoy playing the game. Sure, whatever, knock yourself out.
I'm against it as an official, reoccuring event for the sake of increasing diversity, because it isn't solving or addressing any issue. We already know that plenty of women play smash, we already know half of gaming is female. (YES, half of gaming is female. Your personal definition of "gamer" is irrelevant.) The issue isn't getting them to play, the issue is letting them feel like they belong in the same space simultaneously. The idea that we can only help the issue by creating a nice little bubble where we remove ourselves from the equation isn't helping anything long-term, and just goes to show how crappy the issue is.
I agree about the potential grouping problem. But it is a bad idea to compare esports to physical sports, since segregating genders for the sake of complete fairness most of the time makes sense...though one could easily argue that sports dont do a very good job of being fairly inclusive to begin with, disregarding gender entirely, and adding gender to the mix just makes it worse. Yeah, the female body is just naturally more vulnerable than the male one, and none of the rules ever take that into consideration, but rules regarding body type in general have always just been male-directed to begin with.Well, it's entirely possible that poorly executed experiments can make public perception problems worse.
I can say with 100% certainty that whenever there is a women's-only event for any sport, part of the audience (or those who hear about it) take it as implicit evidence that women are on average not as skilled or competitive as men.
Regardless of how you or I feel, most of the public regards the WNBA as a joke. Males hold every Olympic record except the discus throw. And while this may not carry over directly into eSports, reaction time certain does and averages better for males across age demographics.
I have no interest in boorish arguments about how women are supposedly less capable or less competitive than men according to genetics or evolution or astrology or whatever. I'm just laying out plainly that if you do present women's events as separate, it furthers a common narrative that says women have to have their own walled garden to compete in.
It implies that women = JV, which is the root of most sexism in society.
Elaboration:
The WNBA is a public joke, but the NBA itself doesn't even make any real attempts to be inclusive among men. The average height across the NBA is 6'7", average weight well over 200lbs. There are no "balancing" rules when it comes to the physical ability of the players, so naturally the "meta" is aimed towards the perfect mix of taller, faster, and heavier. Even if women were allowed to compete in the same league, the rules of the sport would "naturally select" against the vast, vast majority of them, off genetic predispositions alone.
In boxing, fighters are grouped by weight class. This rule evolved much more intuitively, since putting a Manny Pacquiao in the ring with a Mike Tyson is a f***ing terrible idea. In boxing there is a "Below the Belt" rule thats clearly there to discourage you from attacking a very vulnerable male weakpoint. This is a good rule. But if women were allowed to compete with men, considering the limitation on weight, would there also be a rule barring chest strikes? Woman vs. Woman i don't think this is even an issue, but in Man vs. Woman this becomes a mutually exclusive weakpoint. I think in MMA, for some asinine reason, female fighters are even forbidden from wearing groin protection, as if there's nothing to damage down there.
In boxing, fighters are grouped by weight class. This rule evolved much more intuitively, since putting a Manny Pacquiao in the ring with a Mike Tyson is a f***ing terrible idea. In boxing there is a "Below the Belt" rule thats clearly there to discourage you from attacking a very vulnerable male weakpoint. This is a good rule. But if women were allowed to compete with men, considering the limitation on weight, would there also be a rule barring chest strikes? Woman vs. Woman i don't think this is even an issue, but in Man vs. Woman this becomes a mutually exclusive weakpoint. I think in MMA, for some asinine reason, female fighters are even forbidden from wearing groin protection, as if there's nothing to damage down there.
TL;DR large physical sports have never actually tried to include females, because none of them have actually sacrificed any parts of their rulesets that would allow not only women but people in general to have a completely fair shot to begin with. With women it's a bit more egregious and so the easiest step down is just to create a seperate, "JV" league for them to compete in.
Esports though is completely different. Any data regarding reaction times discrepancy is a complete wash, such a thing depends entirely on what you have trained your body and mind to do. We're talking about nerves here, there is no gender difference. The issue women have with esports and gaming is that the community is just inherently hostile towards them, sometimes intentionally, most of the time subconsciously.
You've got the clear major offenders ("you lost to a girl", *joke with kitchen punchline*), you've got the minor, subconscious offenders ("You're good for a girl", *insert obnoxious flirt attempt here*), and you've got the people who just exacerbate all the other issues by either laughing from the sidelines, watching it happen without calling it out, or simply assert that it isn't a problem at all (THE worst of all. If this is you, shut up, you make everything worse).
The girls can tough it out and deal with it, but it's going to have to be a change on the men's end to actually make any real progress. You can have "female only" tournaments and get a good turnout, and yeah it probably will ultimately help the tournament scene at large. But what people should be aiming for is the ability to not have females be turned away from general events at all.
Last edited: