Turbo Ether
Smash Master
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2006
- Messages
- 3,601
I'm not that sorry. I just attempted to come off as a 50% d*ck instead of a 100% d*ck.Don't apologize.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I'm not that sorry. I just attempted to come off as a 50% d*ck instead of a 100% d*ck.Don't apologize.
I'm sorry man, you came off as 0% duck.I'm not that sorry. I just attempted to come off as a 50% d*ck instead of a 100% d*ck.
People, its WAY to early to decide on a ban. Sure MK rewards bad players on a silver platter, but that can also be said of Game and Watch, as he also falls under MKs "how to use well range". G&W doesn't take much skill to use. MK basically takes none.
I say we wait until AT LEAST summer of 09. We could then see if MK is even ban worthy, and I gurantee then he won't be. He isn't even ban worthy now. =\
Considering the state of Brawl right now, I don't think we can wait until next summer. By then, the game will have died out majorly and the community will have deteriorated considerably.I say we wait until AT LEAST summer of 09. We could then see if MK is even ban worthy, and I gurantee then he won't be. He isn't even ban worthy now. =\
The thing is, we just can't know if we don't wait... Banning MK now could end up hurting Brawl's future, if it turns out that MK has one or more 55/45 matchups.Considering the state of Brawl right now, I don't think we can wait until next summer. By then, the game will have died out majorly and the community will have deteriorated considerably.
There's actually a lot of MK mains that said Yes!Alright, now take a poll to see how many out of the group that said "No" main MK.
Compared to how much it will be hurt if we don't ban and the current trend continues?The thing is, we just can't know if we don't wait... Banning MK now could end up hurting Brawl's future, if it turns out that MK has one or more 55/45 matchups.
Deoxys, think about this.The thing is, we just can't know if we don't wait... Banning MK now could end up hurting Brawl's future, if it turns out that MK has one or more 55/45 matchups.
YES! My thoughts exactly. No one wants to see this community erupt into chaos.Deoxys, think about this.
It's better to lose a character then it is to risk the loss of a community.
Well said man, well said.Deoxys, think about this.
It's better to lose a character then it is to risk the loss of a community.
Because they weren't as broken as MK is, they could still be beaten, but MK in the hands of a pro is almost impossible to beat.My opinion is that if a character is in a game, he deserves to be played. Banning a character is not only a slap in the face of true SSB gamers, but a slap in the face of Nintendo, and Masahiro Sakurai. You simply can't just ban a character because you think he is unbeatable. What gives people the authority to ban a character that they didn't make, don't own the rights to, and couldn't dream of imagining? Simply get better at the game. Play against some of the best MetaKnight players. That's what gaming is all about. Getting better, and having fun doing it. No one banned Falco...or Sheik, or Fox. Why ban MetaKnight?
Try reading the thread.My opinion is that if a character is in a game, he deserves to be played. Banning a character is not only a slap in the face of true SSB gamers, but a slap in the face of Nintendo, and Masahiro Sakurai. You simply can't just ban a character because you think he is unbeatable. What gives people the authority to ban a character that they didn't make, don't own the rights to, and couldn't dream of imagining? Simply get better at the game. Play against some of the best MetaKnight players. That's what gaming is all about. Getting better, and having fun doing it. No one banned Falco...or Sheik, or Fox. Why ban MetaKnight?
For fun some stages have a right to be played, and items have a right to be played. But for serious competition, no some stages, and all items, do not. They just affect the outcome too much and make it luck based. And I agree with what you are saying...if something is too broken and completely destroys the metagame, does it have a right to be used?Try reading the thread.
Do you think Akuma should be unbanned in Street Fighter?
You practically said it on your own there. No one banned Falco, or Sheik, or Fox. Why? They were equals. They had equals.
MK is alone and completely dominant. Appealing to emotion is nothing- characters don't have a "right" to be played if they unbalance the game. Do stages have a right to be played? Do items?
I didn't know "unbeatable" was in a gamer's vocab. Maybe it's because I haven't been to many tournaments. I've lost matches against good gamers, so what? No sole character should be banned simply because he is "unbeatable". This will pave the way for all sorts of characters from all sorts of games being banned for the same or similar reasons. No one has the right to ban anything. No one has the right to do so except for Nintendo.Because they weren't as broken as MK is, they could still be beaten, but MK in the hands of a pro is almost impossible to beat.
Zero Suit Samus? What on Earth? Last time I checked, the matchup was 80-20 in Metaknight's favor...From what I've experienced, ZSS's is pretty much screwed if he gets in close or gets her in the air and don't even get me started on what his edgeguarding skills do to her. Ike is almost the same way but at least he can reasonably kill MK at 70-80% on medium stages. This match up is supposedly 70-30 and ZSS has an even harder time killing so there's absolutely no way the match up could be even unless I'm missing out of something big.I do not wish to ban him. Yoshi goes even with him from what I hear and its debatable whether zero suit samus does too. Its too early and hes not unbeatable.
A ZSS beat a MK once and even went ape. Just another Diddy, DK, Snake, Marth, G&W, Yoshi, etc., etc.... except Yoshi never actually even beat an MK.Zero Suit Samus? What on Earth? Last time I checked, the matchup was 80-20 in Metaknight's favor...From what I've experienced, ZSS's is pretty much screwed if he gets in close or gets her in the air and don't even get me started on what his edgeguarding skills do to her. Ike is almost the same way but at least he can reasonably kill MK at 70-80% on medium stages. This match up is supposedly 70-30 and ZSS has an even harder time killing so there's absolutely no way the match up could be even unless I'm missing out of something big.
I never said unbeatable, now did I? I said he is ALMOST impossible to beat, not unbeatable. There is still a slight chance of victory against him, but chances are its not gonna happen. Not many characters can be banned from other games either, because most other games have some sort of sense of balance, but Brawl doesn't with how far MK is above the rest of the characters. That's like saying lets ban DIO in JUS because he's the top of the top tier. But in actuality he can easily be beaten by some good in middle, hell even bottom tier.I didn't know "unbeatable" was in a gamer's vocab. Maybe it's because I haven't been to many tournaments. I've lost matches against good gamers, so what? No sole character should be banned simply because he is "unbeatable". This will pave the way for all sorts of characters from all sorts of games being banned for the same or similar reasons. No one has the right to ban anything. No one has the right to do so except for Nintendo.
If it's YOUR tournament, and it's how YOU play, then fine. I can't tell you what to do. But I'm against it 100% as a fan of Nintendo since 3 years young.
Don't know any thing about SF. Never got into Street Fighter. All the games are basically the same to me lol.Try reading the thread.
Do you think Akuma should be unbanned in Street Fighter?
You practically said it on your own there. No one banned Falco, or Sheik, or Fox. Why? They were equals. They had equals.
MK is alone and completely dominant. Appealing to emotion is nothing- characters don't have a "right" to be played if they unbalance the game. Do stages have a right to be played? Do items?
Oh... it's one of THOSE cases... Let's see now: first Wolf was said to be a Metaknight counter because his lazer stops the tornado and then people realized this was utter crap, then it was Ike, then it was Lucario, then it was Donkey Kong, then it was Yoshi, then it was Diddy Kong, and Snake being a Metaknight counter was debunked about two months ago... I hate how people overreact like that. -_-; Did you know there's a thread in the Jigglypuff board that claims that Jigglypuff is a Metaknight counter simply because of her dair to rest combo? Geez...A ZSS beat a MK once and even went ape. Just another Diddy, DK, Snake, Marth, G&W, Yoshi, etc., etc.... except Yoshi never actually even beat an MK.
Almost impossible to beat...okay, my fault. But I just don't know...even if he is a great as you say he is, it's still not an excuse to just write him off. To me, he's a challenge in the game. You have to meet the challenge. But maybe you know more about this than me. I don't know. I just don't think that banning a character can help.I never said unbeatable, now did I? I said he is ALMOST impossible to beat, not unbeatable. There is still a slight chance of victory against him, but chances are its not gonna happen. Not many characters can be banned from other games either, because most other games have some sort of sense of balance, but Brawl doesn't with how far MK is above the rest of the characters. That's like saying lets ban DIO in JUS because he's the top of the top tier. But in actuality he can easily be beaten by some good in middle, hell even bottom tier.
Meet the challenge of something that is nigh impossible to beat? Hell, people are just switching to him so they can win, thus ruining other characters metagames. If he is banned, people can't switch to him, so they will main someone else and develop there metagame thus the game progresses more then it is right now, with MK's running rampant in every tournament.Almost impossible to beat...okay, my fault. But I just don't know...even if he is a great as you say he is, it's still not an excuse to just write him off. To me, he's a challenge in the game. You have to meet the challenge. But maybe you know more about this than me. I don't know. I just don't think that banning a character can help.
I guess I can see where you are coming from in a tournament standpoint...but shouldn't there has to be another way besides simply banning a character? I mean, maybe it's because I haven't played a good MK player. If I'm in a tournament, even if I don't win or if I do, I just want to know that I won with all characters available. A ban just sounds so weak...maybe a limit on how many can use him, first come, first serve...not a ban. He just shouldn't be banned completely.Meet the challenge of something that is nigh impossible to beat? Hell, people are just switching to him so they can win, thus ruining other characters metagames. If he is banned, people can't switch to him, so they will main someone else and develop there metagame thus the game progresses more then it is right now, with MIK's running rampant in every tournament.
Here's the logic behind switching to him :
1. Try to develop a strategy that may not work and may cost you the chance at winning a tourney worth upwards of $5000.
2. Switch to Metaknight and win an easy $5000.
See the trend that will happen/is already happening?
I can see where you are coming from, but in a tournament it just doesn't work. And to top it all of, some guy placed 2nd in a tournament just by using MK's B move over and over again. That's another reason he has be banned, you can win just by pressing one button. Right now a ban is the way to get around him. After a month or 2, the ban might be lifted, since other players metagames will have evolved more (more tactics found etc) instead of just using MK over and over causing other peoples metagames to suffer.I guess I can see where you are coming from in a tournament standpoint...but shouldn't there has to be another way besides simply banning a character? I mean, maybe it's because I haven't played a good MK player. If I'm in a tournament, even if I don't win or if I do, I just want to know that I won with all characters available. A ban just sounds so weak...maybe a limit on how many can use him, first come, first serve...not a ban. He just shouldn't be banned completely.
Silly emotions and ideals should not influence actions against characters that break the game.I guess I can see where you are coming from in a tournament standpoint...but shouldn't there has to be another way besides simply banning a character? I mean, maybe it's because I haven't played a good MK player. If I'm in a tournament, even if I don't win or if I do, I just want to know that I won with all characters available. A ban just sounds so weak...maybe a limit on how many can use him, first come, first serve...not a ban. He just shouldn't be banned completely.
Not like I know what a metagame is lol...but it deserves to evolve if it helps him not to be banned. Maybe people can't stand him winning because his fanfare is so bad *** lol. But seriously, I still don't agree he should be banned, but I can deal with a temporary one if he is so dominant in tournament play. I wouldn't know though, I'm not one of these seasoned vets.I can see where you are coming from, but in a tournament it just doesn't work. And to top it all of, some guy placed 2nd in a tournament just by using MK's B move over and over again. That's another reason he has be banned, you can win just by pressing one button. Right now a ban is the way to get around him. After a month or 2, the ban might be lifted, since other players metagames will have evolved more (more tactics found etc) instead of just using MK over and over causing other peoples metagames to suffer.
Yeah...but I was talking about tournaments...lls. And I think you're right about emotions, but really, would you honestly be happy with yourself at one of these tournaments if you placed, but only because someone could not use MK? That why think there should be a limit, or I argee with Sora in that it should be temporary. Until metagames can evolve for tournament play...whatever a metagame is lolSBR can't do jack outside of the tournament scene. What are they gonna do, stomp in your home with the FBI when you use Meta at your friends house?
And silly emotions and ideals should not influence actions against characters that break the game.
A metagame is basically how well a certain character can be played, to a certain extent. If he/she is used more, their metagame evolves, which means people will become better with that certain person overall, and will have new tactics to use with him/her. If you don't play in tournament play, you can still use him, just don't main him or else you will be disappointed when you go to a tournament. I still use MK sometimes in casual play, but if I'm being serious, I always switch to my main DiddyNot like I know what a metagame is lol...but it deserves to evolve if it helps him not to be banned. Maybe people can't stand him winning because his fanfare is so bad *** lol. But seriously, I still don't agree he should be banned, but I can deal with a temporary one if he is so dominant in tournament play. I wouldn't know though, I'm not one of these seasoned vets.
Sure, because they'd have applied all their skill to whatever character they faced me with, and I'd have won against them.And I think you're right about emotions, but really, would you honestly be happy with yourself at one of these tournaments if you placed, but only because someone could not use MK?
Diddy...I hate when people use those **** bananas and that running attack...that strategy pisses me off because I have to work hard to win lol.A metagame is basically how well a certain character can be played, to a certain extent. If he/she is used more, their metagame evolves, which means people will become better with that certain person overall, and will have new tactics to use with him/her. If you don't play in tournament play, you can still use him, just don't main him or else you will be disappointed when you go to a tournament. I still use MK sometimes in casual play, but if I'm being serious, I always switch to my main Diddy
Yes. Yes I would.would you honestly be happy with yourself at one of these tournaments if you placed, but only because someone could not use MK?
He's not really one of my favorite players to play as but I guess I could learn for some extra gwap lol j/kSure, because they'd have applied all their skill to whatever character they faced me with, and I'd have won against them.
As things stand now anyway, chances are that if MK had been allowed we both would have been MK so we both would be playing "unpreferred" characters.
This is a gross hyperbole. It's freakishly unlikely that a Metaknight could win a match simply by using the Mach Tornado especially when your opponent has to be 200+% for even the lightest characters like Mr. Game and Watch and Jigglypuff to get KO'd off the top. Also, I think most tournaments would label this as stalling since it would easily take more than 8 minutes to deplete 3 stock especially if they were playing against people who can easily stop the tornado like Yoshi, Falco, Wolf, and the Ice Climbers. Really, in order to be defeated simply by the tornado, you have to suck horribly at Brawl or be comatose.I can see where you are coming from, but in a tournament it just doesn't work. And to top it all of, some guy placed 2nd in a tournament just by using MK's B move over and over again. That's another reason he has be banned, you can win just by pressing one button. Right now a ban is the way to get around him. After a month or 2, the ban might be lifted, since other players metagames will have evolved more (more tactics found etc) instead of just using MK over and over causing other peoples metagames to suffer.