GreenMamba
Smash Journeyman
- Joined
- May 15, 2006
- Messages
- 361
No, it definitely is not.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
... I just like the wording. It's so ironic....once you pick up the game, you're no longer looking at Zamus as a sex object, but as a fighter that can **** the crud out of you.
I actually addressed that point in an earlier post. I said that Sakurai did absolutely nothing to the non-suited Samus other than use her in his game. Take a look at most Metroid endings, and you'll see Samus, with her flowing blonde hair, waving at you while wearing a bikini. Zero Mission was the first time we actually saw suitless Sammy sporting more than high-tech undies. The fact that Sakurai chose that Samus would wear that when he removed her armor (that... didn't sound quite right...) makes it seem, at least to me, that he wanted to pull away from a sexualized image of Samus, rather than promote it.That's a decent argument for saying that Sakurai did not put Zero Suit Samus into the game specifically just so her sex will sell the game as a primary factor, but I fail to see what that has to do with whether or not it was Sakurai that "turned Samus into a sex object", especially given that what we've seen of Zero Suit Samus in promo shots has often involved up close shots, not the far-away shots of the gameplay. Andi n the case of a sex object, it's the PROMO shots that matter since that's how things are being PROMOTED (or marketted or advertised or whatever)
Not that Sakurai has specifically marketted Samus as a sex object either though (my own opinion being that Sakurai hasn't 'turned Samus into' ANYTHING because Samus without her suit has always been like this). I'm just saying that that particular post doesn't particularly address the topic at hand so much as address a similar tangental topic.
Thank you. It is such a big deal? Just die already!Can we puh-leaze just let this stupid thread die already? It's redundant, mindless, and redudant. Okay, maybe if this were a normal fighting game where it's always one on one and the camera kept itself zoomed in enough to keep the fighters covering most of the screen, like Tekken or Soul Calibur, than maybe you could misconstrue some of this as intentional sex appeal. But this is Smash Bros. The characters in this game never show up very big on the screen, except for when you choose them and when you win. If you really wanted to find sex appeal anywhere, you'd have to be looking very hard for it, and at that point it'd be your problem, not the developers.
And another thing, about this whole 'subtle sex appeal' thing. That's just crap. Japanese game makers are never, ever subtle when they want to put sex appeal into a game. Look at Lulu from FFX. Look at every single female character from Tekken or Soul Calibur. Hell, look at this entire game:
http://kotaku.com/gaming/top/snk-on-witching-touching-game-207023.php
Japan isn't afraid to blatantly put out there "Hey, this game has hot chicks, buy it!" They wouldn't be afraid to do that here, either. Unless of course, they weren't actually trying to put ZS Samus in for her looks.
Yes, I'll admit sex sells. Yes, I'll admit that there has been, are now, and always will be perverts who get off on this kind of stuff. But that doesn't mean that It was an intentional move on the part of Sakurai and his studio. I mean, really, people. This is Nintendo we're talking about people. One of the most family-friendly video game companies in the world. And to helm this project, they've chosen Masahiro Sakurai, the man who invented Kirby. Kirby! Does this seem like the kind of guy to go out of his way to throw sex into a game? No! It does not.
Don't give us that crap again. *sigh* Can't believe I have to explain this again.It isn't about sex appeal it's about the change of her character.
USED TO BE MYSTERIOUS BOUNTY HUNTER now is a SEX BOMB :<
the threadstarter was aftraid this would change her more to the direction of sex bomb instead of the good old bounty hunter samus WE DONT WANT ANOTHER LARA CROFT :<
We want her to be the Samus you know from all those long hours playing from the NES to the GC as a fearsome bounty hunter who wasn't afraid to shoot some alien ***.
Finally!At least we have the best possible argument right here on the table now.
The thread may now die in peace.
Well, I'm not completely sure. To me, it's more about proving that even under all of that armor that Samus is wearing, she's still just a vulnerable female human being. It might have something to do with sex appeal, but it might also have deeper meaning. Showing a more human side of Samus benefits her as a character.
We hardly get to see Samus without the her suit on, so it's a good refresher to see what she looks like under all of it. Every little bit of information that proves her human qualities has become important. Everything from her getting infected by the X-virus in Metroid Fusion, and showing her vulnerability without the suit in Metroid Zero Mission, to giving her a noticeable voice (reaction sounds, anyway) in Metroid Prime takes her farther and farther from that "cyborg" feeling given in the first few games.
In turn, Sakurai's decision was great for all sides.
Wouldn't that be what she'd logically be wearing under there anyway? I dunno about you, but if I was wearing a massive armored suit, I wouldn't want to be wearing blue jeans and a hoody. A body glove would work out well. And what's she wearing? A body glove!
And only now do I realized I just bumped this totally worthless topic. Some one beat me senseless please...
Definately the bat.With a bat or Retarted stick. you choose lol.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/jack off ?GrrYou know what? People that bring up Samus' sex appeal really jacks me off
![]()