Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Still find it odd since it's somewhat not confirmed that a executioner is in the game or not.
fos rockin for discouraging wagons by suggesting unlikely roles. plus second quote makes no sense. a townie for a scumbag is a good dealIn anycase, I always feel that every townie should be counted, whether we go to lynch the executioner or not.
Really, I like to consider there's more roles then just the typical cop and doc roles. Also, I like to hear you say that when we lose a pr townie. I know saving all townies is nearly impossible, but I want to try and lynch as many anti townies as possible without a mislynch of the kind. But again, that's very hard.fos rockin for discouraging wagons by suggesting unlikely roles. plus second quote makes no sense. a townie for a scumbag is a good deal
I would've said something in terms of that minutes later had he not said that last part of what do we think. Again, I didn't like it, since I'm sure most (if not all) we gonna discuss that anyway. It just seemed almost unnecessary >>Nick was asking for other people's opions on their debate and this is the best you can come up with? No comments on their disagreements or the OMGUS votes/Tom's unvoting? I don't like how you tend to wait for other people's opinions first (also happened in Simpsons mafia...).
![]()
Since it's pretty much apparant, I'll share my view onto the matter...even though I was going to share it anyway >>Again you keep yourself out of the discussion for the most part. Not scummy but not terribly helpful either. I'd rather have you adress some of the points that are brought up instead of just dodgin them like that. Dunno what to rhink of your policy.
![]()
Would you care to explain that vote?Unvote
Vote: Nick
This is easier.
Not every game is played with Marshy's inactivity rule.Prod Frozenflame
The more people we have in this discussion the more likely we'll find something to start a good debate with.
![]()
Does this not stand out to anyone at all? Why would you want to draw attention to yourself like this? I don't understand this play at all. It's one thing to base something off the reactions of what occured between you and Tom, but it's really odd to be like 'Hey guys look at this argument! Tell me what you think about it!" when you are part of the argument, especially when, in my opinion, you are getting owned and don't know when you've lost the argument. It looks like he tried to get in the fire then wants everyone to notice it.Anyway, what does everyone else think about the back-and-forth between me and Tom? I'd like some opinions.
First, i'll join your bandwagon. unvote; Vote FrozenflameOh yeah, I forgot about Marshy's inactivity rule not being in play. Bleh...
Alright time for another BW attempt.
Vote FrozenFlame
Also FoS Rockin for the reasons Riddle posted.
![]()
Did you read the thread? See below to see how Rockin already brought that up, and what other people thought about it.Does this not stand out to anyone at all? Why would you want to draw attention to yourself like this? I don't understand this play at all. It's one thing to base something off the reactions of what occured between you and Tom, but it's really odd to be like 'Hey guys look at this argument! Tell me what you think about it!" when you are part of the argument, especially when, in my opinion, you are getting owned and don't know when you've lost the argument. It looks like he tried to get in the fire then wants everyone to notice it.
I don't like how you immiediatly brought this to attention towards us. The talk between you and Tom were quite noticable. Of course we were gonna talk about it eventually once things seem to calm down. Almost as if it was an act. This is probably me being sensitive to some things, but I just don't like it >>
i dont like how you seem to be almost afraid to have an opinion
Vote: Rockin
Your posts make me feel that you are trying to be non-commital to avoid making mistakes and that just seems scummy to me. I feel like your posts don't have much substance and your trying to look like your helping, but aren't.
You bring up a good point although he might just wanted to start a bigger debate based on their conversation hoping some suspicions might survace. I'm not entirely comfortable with his posts and his attitude either but I don't think he's overly suspicious.Does this not stand out to anyone at all? Why would you want to draw attention to yourself like this? I don't understand this play at all. It's one thing to base something off the reactions of what occured between you and Tom, but it's really odd to be like 'Hey guys look at this argument! Tell me what you think about it!" when you are part of the argument, especially when, in my opinion, you are getting owned and don't know when you've lost the argument. It looks like he tried to get in the fire then wants everyone to notice it.
FoS = Finger of suspicion.second, what does FoS mean? (kinda new to mafia games....)
Well, as far as Tom vs Riddle goes, I don't really see much in the bandwagon. The reason Tom gave for voting riddle was basically Riddle self-voting himself in mimcry of Tom. In the RVS stage, small things like that are as good a reason as any to vote, but when bigger scum-tells are found, it's time to move on.You bring up a good point although he might just wanted to start a bigger debate based on their conversation hoping some suspicions might survace. I'm not entirely comfortable with his posts and his attitude either but I don't think he's overly suspicious.
However, before I'm dropping the Tom vs Nick issue I'd like to hear more from Nick. He was only really active when he was pressured by tom. I'd like to hear some opinions from him on Tom vs Riddle and Jungles accusation.
UNVOTE since i forgot who i was voting for![]()
Ronike, where you @???Vote count?
![]()
Yeah, that was my mistake. I was assuming that Marshy's inactivity rule was in play but I realized it wasn't after Riddle told me. Sorry about that, won't happen again.Also, Gheb, I understand that it is frustrating that FF is not here and posting, but seeing as how I am the mod, and you are the player, I would appreciate it if you did not prod players, especially since when you prodded him, he had posted less than 72 hours ago. Thank you!![]()
Well really, not sure what else to really add onto it. The arguement itself looked interesting. Neither one of the people were right or wrong in their sayings, however there was some confusion of defitnition from nic in terms of scumhunting and whatnot. As said, I'm also noticing a different playstyle by Tom. Guess I should further explain that.Not every game is played with Marshy's inactivity rule.
Vote: Rockin
Your posts make me feel that you are trying to be non-commital to avoid making mistakes and that just seems scummy to me. I feel like your posts don't have much substance and your trying to look like your helping, but aren't.
It's about how you immediatly asked for it once it was over. Kinda like pulling people into focus of a psudo-scumhunting (I hope I said this right...). If you and Tom were having an arguement, why wouldn't you think we'd talk about it? I don't think what you did was scummy, but it's weird as hell to do. in MegaMafia, I was talking off with Chaco. Both of us were act each other in D2. Once the topic ended (which there was a clear sign when Thursday came around), after waiting for some time for a person or two to speak about the said topic, I then clearly asked what others thought about it.Nicholas1024 said:As far as Junglefever's accusation, I think he's overthinking it. By drawing attention to myself and the debate, I can stimulate discussion. More discussion is definitely a good thing for town. So, what's suspicious about me asking for opinions?
I just want to say I did took a notice in Nic's post, but I was more interested in how Tom was into the 'bandwagon' thing. And if that 'attention whoring' thing is that last little line he posted about our opinon about it....err....I also wonder why Rockin was the only one, who didn't care about ANYTHING in nicks post ... neither his attentionwhoring nor his OMGUS. Instead he notices Tom being "unusally ban happy"... weird but maybe it's just me because I don't like metagaming all that much.
![]()
....yeah, I kinda spoke about it first. I just wasn't wordy with it like Junglefever was. ironically, you quoted both of us saying this. Your responds to mind was 'what? Is that all?' and to JF is like 'Hmm, you make a good point' even though we both talked about the same thing. It's just he explained it better. Hmm.I don't like how you immiediatly brought this to attention towards us. The talk between you and Tom were quite noticable. Of course we were gonna talk about it eventually once things seem to calm down. Almost as if it was an act. This is probably me being sensitive to some things, but I just don't like it >>
Yeah, probably frozen, and if not him, it's going to be Tom.Marshy, Frozen's still alive cuz after this lynch he's dead regardless XD
OKI just want to say I did took a notice in Nic's post, but I was more interested in how Tom was into the 'bandwagon' thing. And if that 'attention whoring' thing is that last little line he posted about our opinon about it....err....
So what's your opinion on a nick BW?@Gheb: there isn't much to say about his OMGUS. in fact, i found nothing scummy int he whole discussion. All it seemed like was a battle over their views of how the game should be played, which will vary player to player. While one can have a more correct answer or a better way of playing, it doesn't make them more scummy.
Good to see you, frozenflame.So yeah I just read through 3 games tonight. My head hurts.
Simpson's Mafia D1"pre-game" trolling basically killed my motivation to scumhunt for the night. XP
I need to sleep on everything I've read and sort this **** out. I'll have substance by tomorrow, I promise.
Unvote
Alright, unvoteSo yeah I just read through 3 games tonight. My head hurts.
Simpson's Mafia D1"pre-game" trolling basically killed my motivation to scumhunt for the night. XP
I need to sleep on everything I've read and sort this **** out. I'll have substance by tomorrow, I promise.
Unvote