this seemed a bit strange. i guess you started a karthik bandwagon, but you didn't know who to vote for, and we were working our way OUT of the rvs, and you threaten to pull us back in.Lol welcome to playing with KK
Anyway, Tom has pretty much said everything I've had to say so far... I'm not sure who I really want to look into just yet, but for now, Unvote: Kevin Vote: Karthik because so dar we have done very little and need to go scumhunt (sorry for the ripping KK, it's all good natured I assure you)
this is something that i dropped in a one line post, and i feel as though you grabbed onto it. Riddle, can you point to specific posts and why you think Rockin is non-committal? Where is he attempting to put up a helpful facade?Not every game is played with Marshy's inactivity rule.
Vote: Rockin
Your posts make me feel that you are trying to be non-commital to avoid making mistakes and that just seems scummy to me. I feel like your posts don't have much substance and your trying to look like your helping, but aren't.
Something bothers you about nick, but you don't think he's suspicious. you would have voted for his bandwagon, but because i unvoted, you didnt. make your own opinions and stick with them. you are bending to everyone else and being a sponge.Mentos, your point is legit and I already mentioned before what bothers me about nick although I still don't think he's suspicious. Can't hurt to see how he acts under more pressure though (especially regarding his OMGUS vote, which was totally uncalled for). I already mentioned that I'd be down for a nick BW but I waited b/c Tom took his vote off him and a BW looked unlikely at that point.
I also wonder why Rockin was the only one, who didn't care about ANYTHING in nicks post ... neither his attentionwhoring nor his OMGUS. Instead he notices Tom being "unusally ban happy"... weird but maybe it's just me because I don't like metagaming all that much.
How is he any more useful if he posts saying not much at all? He posted, but what difference did it make?I didn't try to pressure him into talking. I voted him because inactive = useless. If he doesn't post I still vote him but since he announced to post more I'm going to assume that he'll be more active from now on. If that doesn't change I'll vote him again (unless somebody has "priority" 'cuz he's overly scummy).
If there's anybody worth pressuring it's either Karthik or Nick imo
Valid point about Swords in (1)I have two things. 1) Does anyone else notice that Swords is prety much following Nick in his actions?
2) Voting to pressure someone and unvoting them because they say 'hi guys' isnt pressuring them. I assume you wanted him to post, but to post something of substance. If you are aiming to kill in activity and coasting then doing it this way doesn't do anything at all.
Right now it looks like, to me, that Swords and Nick seem to be a little buddy buddy here. And they also sound wishy washy with their votes.
Valid point about Gheb in (2)
you point out what im pointing out, but you dont implicate gheb with it?hey look frozen didn't follow up on his promised post and no one's taking issue with it or voting him like they said so nice to see we're really committed to getting responses from people. ok with lynching frozen nick or riddle
my vote is currently on riddle but it might change to you.Still want to hear more from Tom, Kevin and Rockin. Who are your top lynches for now? Would any of you guys mind KK or Riddle dying?