oh a new page, didnt see that, well the above post was in response to lord bowser
anyways arrow I dont need to say anything because pete already said it "How is it a mafia strategy to test someone's identity? It hardly matters if they're lynch immune. You're just acting more and more suspicious."
but I will anyways, in response to this arrow "for being a moose voting ******, trying to call it simple and fail proof when its fail so fail."
not only does this not make sense gramitically, it doesnt make sense logically either, I'm not saying we should lynch him because I have proof (he did say some suss stuff, but no proof)
I'm saying we should lynch him to create proof, innocent or not WE NEED TO CREATE A FOOTHOLD
doing this will create that, and then we can work from there rather then running around in circles.
"atleast one of the people who voted for moose are mafia if not 2. ironically no one suspects these people.."
no-one has openly suspected me because everything I say and do, I explain in full detail using logic and I try to incite group discussion and opinion, and I've been sticking to the 1 lead I had and fully exploring it.
you on the other hand keep changing your mind randomly, and you seem to think that you can decide things for everyone and if they dont go along with what you decided then they are ********, the conclusions I draw from this are either that you are a really bad obvious mafia, or that you are a really bad town who isnt helping in any way, but rather then accuse you of anything, I'm going to wait and see what happens to moose because if he is mafia then it'll be obvious that you are too, if he's innocent then it doesnt nessacaraly mean you are too, but it'll at least give you some trust back.
comprende?