coke vs pepsigood vs evil
confusion vs lucidity
unpure vs pure
asleep vs awake
white vs black
blood vs crips
sony vs microsoft
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
coke vs pepsigood vs evil
confusion vs lucidity
unpure vs pure
asleep vs awake
good vs evil
confusion vs lucidity
unpure vs pure
asleep vs awake
in buddhism ignorance is the root of all suffering or evil,
being completely awake to this is the path to enlightenment or "good
hence good vs evil
lol your just arguing semantics to save face.
hoho your a funny guy. I failed to understand what you were talking about? no let us re-trace our steps to find the root of ignorance in this argument.no, you just have failed to understand what i'm talking about. the idea of "good vs evil" in the sense you first mentioned, about good triumping over evil, would imply the story sort of good vs evil, like in star wars or the bible or something similar. in eastern religions evil is what you do to yourself, not what you do to others (though they're linked together), and there's not evil in the sense of "good vs evil" as much as it is "knowledge vs ignorant", which is not something you can break down western concepts into..
to which you respondedI think buddha said something like evil exists so that good can triumph over it or something.
no. 100% no. not even close. triumph over good and evil is a western religious concept, and doesn't relate to most eastern religions.
if you have such a fine awareness of the buddhist concept evil this argument never would have took place because you would have realized the evil I was referring to when I mentioned it in the context of buddha lol.i'm aware of the concepts of buddhist evil, and i'd actually assume i'm much more aware of them then you are. those terms are just translated into "good and evil". the actual term for "good" in buddhism is sanskrit for awakened, and the term for evil is sanskrit for suffering. buddhism is not about the "triumph of good over evil", it's about people triumping over materialism and seeing things for how they are. hinduism is the same. hell, one of the main gods for hinduism is Shiva the destroyer, and in the Bhagavada-Gita the whole discourse is krishna telling arjuna that it's ok for him to murder his enemies in war, and that instead of worrying about what his actions will cause he should detach himself
and so you prove me good. excellent job, i thought i knew what i was talking about so i didn't bother to look it up, but you did and in your little research showed me i was being dumb.hoho your a funny guy. I failed to understand what you were talking about? no let us re-trace our steps to find the root of ignorance in this argument.
I first posted this
to which you responded
it was you who misunderstood what I was talking about, because the evil I was referring to is ignorance, is confusion,
"evil" explicitly referring to the sole cause of violence, anger, hatred
and good referring to the extinction of evil
the extinction of ignorance.
the extinction of confusion.
the cessation of suffering.
which of course is the good and evil that is refered to in this quote
"To cease from evil, to do good, and to purify the mind yourself, this is the teaching of all the Buddhas."
Dhammapada verse 183
if you have such a fine awareness of the buddhist concept evil this argument never would have took place because you would have realized the evil I was referring to when I mentioned it in the context of buddha lol.
plus. you clearly don't understand Sanskrit because the Sanskrit word for awake is Bodhi or Buddha and the Sanskrit words for good are sundara or sattva among many others, but not bodhi. also the word for suffering is duhkka the word for evil is ahita (among many others)
Sanskrit was around a thousand years before Buddha, the terms awake and good are synonymous in Buddhist philosophy but not equivalent in the Sanskrit language.
lol....
I understand this is mostly a joke post but I think what the non-religious don't understand is that the good theists preach their faith not to condescend, but because they want what's best for other people. You have to remember that most of them believe there will be some from of eternal suffering for those who are sinners, so they don't want that to happen to people.I think the real question is: why do you care what someone else believes?
Is there a God? I think so. I don't care to explain my reasoning to whoever asks, and I rarely, if ever, even mention the fact that I believe in a God.
That argument is a good one, but it is hotly debated and isn't irrefutable fact. It's just too much to go into on a general discussion forum.Way earlier, I showed that God cannot be wholly benevolent and omnipotent at the same time given evil exists. Someone pointed out that good is meaningless without evil, so, by that user's definition (which is just as valid as mine I suppose) God can still be benevolent by allowing evil into the world.
This is a good argument too, except for the fact that it's based on a misunderstanding of good and evil.My problem with this response is that the roles can be reversed. I can say that God is evil, and the only reason he allows good things to happen is because evil is meaningless without good. Just like we wouldn't appreciate the good things we have without first enduring hardships, we wouldn't be vexed by our suffering without knowing that something better exists.
Again this is a problem of evil issue.Has anyone addressed why God won't heal amputees yet? Preferably in a straightforward manner. I don't want people trying to make every word in the dictionary mean every other word.
The only two things I can say here are to read Old Law vs. New Law Theory and actually look at the evidence outside of the Bible for the truth of the Church's teachings before you straw man it.If I have energy, I'll try to explain why an unfalsifiable idea can never have evidence in favor of it.
Also, I care that other people believe in God because I'm gay. It hurts me directly when people draw their morals from the alleged teachings of an invisible sky-man that apparently wanted to stone children for disobedience and condoned **** and slavery.
Reducing morality to victimless crimes and what is socially agreeable isn't always what's best though. I'm not talking about homosexuality specifically, but the above sentence is the general type of thinking you're advocating.Instead I propose that people draw their moral guidelines from their ability to empathize with others. That would make the world a better place, IMO.
there's a reason simpsons has been on longer and produces way more episodes per season-__- and they receive roughly 7 or 8 times the number of viewers than south park.....and the south park guys have already said simpsons is the greatest cartoon ever createdNo way is the Simpsons better than South Park.
I think the real question is: why do you care what someone else believes?
The simpsons were better, but now that simpsons sucks and south park is better (found the early eps rather eh) I think they're about even overall. And this is completly off-topic. *Ahem*there's a reason simpsons has been on longer and produces way more episodes per season-__- and they receive roughly 7 or 8 times the number of viewers than south park.....and the south park guys have already said simpsons is the greatest cartoon ever createdbut lets not get into a debate here. being a major fan of both, i can say we'll just chop it up to opinion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-tuned_UniverseNo way is the Simpsons better than South Park.
Anyway.
GOD, I really don't think what I had to say about fine-tuning comes from ignorance. There are literally so many stars in the universe that it's basically guaranteed that there are trillions of places where life would exist if thing were a little different, but it doesn't. Likewise, there are almost definitely trillions of places like ours to where if things were a little different, life would not exists. And I'm sure (literally, I believe it as much as you believe in God) that whoever lives in those places have had the same conversation that we're having now. Just because we haven't found one of those places yet doesn't mean they don't exist.
Hell, for my argument to be true, all we have to find is a single planet orbiting just outside it's star's habitable zone. The odds of this are pretty much 100%.
Perfect. <3 Randallimage
Scientology is a complete and utter scam with a ton of blood on its hands. The basis for the religion is that everyone is filled up with "thetans", which are troubled spirits from millions of years ago. Back then, an evil galactic overlord named Xenu came to Earth, captured all of the thetans, put them into volcanoes and blew the volcanoes up. This shattered the thetans up and spread them across the words, and they had to take refuge inside human bodies. Most Scientology rituals/etc. involve cleansing yourself of thetans.Is the South Park episode the one where everyone in the credits is just Jack and Jane Smith so they can't get sued?
Is anyone scientologist here? I don't relaly understand the basis for the faith.
Ron Hubbard has been quoted saying "if a man wants to make millions of dollars, he should start his own religion".
Also, ex-scientologists have come out and said that you needed to pay thousands of dollars before high-level doctrine would be revealed to you.
I know the media is against it, and I'm not really attacking it, I'm just more curious to know what the basis of belief for scientology is.
Please no one make offensive comments, keep it respectfull fellas.
Hell yeah, in questionnaires asking for religious beliefs, I always circle other and put Jedi.You can mock me but i know i'm right and Jediism is is the 4th biggest religion in the U.K.
I touched the opposite pole, so me walking forward to the bathroom counts, right?In order to join the faith, today you have to walk backwards somewhere. It doesn't matter; to the supermarket, to the bus stop, or even just to your bathroom, and you're in.