Glaciacott
Smash Lord
Crashy Bashy
Chance 75%
I think Crash right now is single-handedly the most likely character for this pass. The amount of things going for him is astronomical, while the detractions other people mention I just plainly do not agree with. And it's honestly a very short list of third parties that have as much going for them as Crash... maybe Steve? Seriously though, there's just so much going for Crash:
- Massive cultural appeal and historical significance: what Sonic was to the early 1990s, Crash was to the late 1990s. In terms of sheer mascot significance, Crash is one of the few hyper-iconic mascots that are still not in Smash brothers. And as others say, we're talking about global appeal, with Japan in particular loving this character
- Popularity and current day significance: At this point Crash is probably the most iconic character that consistently tops fan polls for Smash. Add to that the fact that the N. Sane Trilogy put his franchise back on the map and did so well that it led not only to Crash Team Racing coming back and re-introducing several characters from this property to fans all over again, but this year we also have a mobile game AND Crash 4. N. Sane Trilogy and CTR also got ported to Switch and seem to do pretty well, and I'll be surprised if Crash 4 doesn't get ported down the line as well
- High moveset diversity and potential for a pack: After such a high amount of games there are a ton of things to draw from Crash to add to Smash. Tons of music, tons of possibilities for a map, and the moveset has a ton of potential. You can even throw Coco in there as an alt.
To counter some of the drawbacks I've seen:
"Crash 4 didn't get announced for Switch"
I don't think this matters whatsoever
1. The dev team is likely focusing on the best possible graphics and performance, for which it makes sense to develop for the more tech intensive consoles currently available and worry about porting to Switch afterwards
2. The teams involved in porting the Crash/Spyro games to Switch might not be the same teams as the ones developing the base game. Both N. Sane Trilogy and Spyro Reignited were clearly ported to switch, not made natively to support it. Crash 4 will likely see the same treatment. It's also worth noting that I think different companies published the games for Switch in Japan, which again means that necessary negotiations with other companies are necessary and likely not to be prioritized as hard as having a base game ready for the core crash audience that exists on PS (because yes, Crash still is very very profitable on Playstation.)
3. If Smash negotiations took place they likely happened roughly a year ago. At those times Crash 4 was likely as secret a project as it was up until it got leaked, so it makes no sense that it would factor into the negotiations nor does it say anything about Nintendo-Activision relationships outside of Crash 4 not being developed with Switch in mind.
"Activision difficulties"
Activision is a company of sufficient clout to have international presence and offices in more places than even Nintendo. If negotiations required their presence I'm pretty sure Activision would have zero problem getting people to Japan, or equally likely, to Redmond to visit NoA. Nowadays it's more complicated because of Covid, but I doubt they'd decide on a character and then, post-Covid, decide against it.
I also don't understand people having such pessimism towards western characters. I think what's more significant is that the character itself have such a tremendous impact that even Japan is aware of it. It is impossible to deny the amount of great publicity and sales that would come from Crash of all characters making it to Smash and being in the same game as Mario and Sonic, and it's hard to believe that Nintendo would pass up that chance to avoid working with Activision. Particularly since they have worked together before.
Regarding the controversies and the like I refuse to comment, but I also see those as insignificant to Crash. I also don't foresee this would impact sales of a DLC pass with Crash. Particularly since Crash has enough star power that you don't really think Activision when you see him... you just think of Crash. This is similar to me as the likes of Scorpion and Lara Croft, characters to embedded in gaming lore that they stand tall regardless of who owns them (though it helps for those owners to actually do something with them.)
Oh, talk about Activision... I saw someone saying this could be a case of Resident Evil where everyone expected it but nothing happened. So now to point out why it's a completely different circumstance: Resident Evil has competition with other Capcom characters (see: dante) for a game with already significant Capcom representation. The most competition Crash would have for Smash would arguably be Spyro or Tracer, neither of which are a tenth as likely as Crash. While Activision does have other more significant properties (CoD, Candy Crush), neither of these present the possibility of a character as well nor do they have the presence on Nintendo consoles that Crash has.
Want: 100%
I was once of those people who played Crash games back around when they first came out on PS1, and they were nothing short of excellent. They were simply magical times, and where Sonic was on the way out, Crash was slowly taking his place as the one to stick it to Mario and provide proper competition.
The fact that Crash returned to form so excellently these past couple years and actually has new games down the line is fantastic to me, and there is honestly no better time for this character to be included in Smash. The first pass was for me fairly low-key until Banjo stepped in and fulfilled dreams everywhere... I think the next character that can reach that high note is Crash and I believe him to be THE titan of Fighter's Pass 2.
Spyro
Chance 1%
In a world where Crash feels like he's at the cusp of joining, I just don't think there's a shred of a chance for Spyro. Their franchises pretty much existed in parallel with both dying out and coming back at roughly the same time and both winding up as part of Activision, but while both saw remasters it's Crash right now that has the most star power globally and he's the one I see taking the envelope.
As a side note, I think even Tracer is more likely than Spyro, if anything because of Overwatch being fairly popular in Japan and Overwatch having been a super popular title back in...2016 I think? Still, neither of them hold a candle to the titan Crash is right now.
Want 100%
Much like I played Crash on PS1, I also played a ton of Spyro. In fact, I think Spyro the dragon was my first PS1 game, and that first game was familiar enough to me at a certain point where I was running it and doing races with others. I admittedly never enjoyed the sequels to the same level as the first one (though in the reignited trilogy I enjoyed YotD the most), but that first game stood tall as a game I could keep coming back to for a great time, every time.
There's no doubt Spyro would be an excellent addition to Smash, I just don't think we're quite there yet. Definitely closer than we were back in Smash 4 though!
I'll actually use nominations these time since I saw someone do this one back in the paper mario day, and I'm enjoying bug fables soooo much right now
x5 Vi (Bug Fables)
Chance 75%
I think Crash right now is single-handedly the most likely character for this pass. The amount of things going for him is astronomical, while the detractions other people mention I just plainly do not agree with. And it's honestly a very short list of third parties that have as much going for them as Crash... maybe Steve? Seriously though, there's just so much going for Crash:
- Massive cultural appeal and historical significance: what Sonic was to the early 1990s, Crash was to the late 1990s. In terms of sheer mascot significance, Crash is one of the few hyper-iconic mascots that are still not in Smash brothers. And as others say, we're talking about global appeal, with Japan in particular loving this character
- Popularity and current day significance: At this point Crash is probably the most iconic character that consistently tops fan polls for Smash. Add to that the fact that the N. Sane Trilogy put his franchise back on the map and did so well that it led not only to Crash Team Racing coming back and re-introducing several characters from this property to fans all over again, but this year we also have a mobile game AND Crash 4. N. Sane Trilogy and CTR also got ported to Switch and seem to do pretty well, and I'll be surprised if Crash 4 doesn't get ported down the line as well
- High moveset diversity and potential for a pack: After such a high amount of games there are a ton of things to draw from Crash to add to Smash. Tons of music, tons of possibilities for a map, and the moveset has a ton of potential. You can even throw Coco in there as an alt.
To counter some of the drawbacks I've seen:
"Crash 4 didn't get announced for Switch"
I don't think this matters whatsoever
1. The dev team is likely focusing on the best possible graphics and performance, for which it makes sense to develop for the more tech intensive consoles currently available and worry about porting to Switch afterwards
2. The teams involved in porting the Crash/Spyro games to Switch might not be the same teams as the ones developing the base game. Both N. Sane Trilogy and Spyro Reignited were clearly ported to switch, not made natively to support it. Crash 4 will likely see the same treatment. It's also worth noting that I think different companies published the games for Switch in Japan, which again means that necessary negotiations with other companies are necessary and likely not to be prioritized as hard as having a base game ready for the core crash audience that exists on PS (because yes, Crash still is very very profitable on Playstation.)
3. If Smash negotiations took place they likely happened roughly a year ago. At those times Crash 4 was likely as secret a project as it was up until it got leaked, so it makes no sense that it would factor into the negotiations nor does it say anything about Nintendo-Activision relationships outside of Crash 4 not being developed with Switch in mind.
"Activision difficulties"
Activision is a company of sufficient clout to have international presence and offices in more places than even Nintendo. If negotiations required their presence I'm pretty sure Activision would have zero problem getting people to Japan, or equally likely, to Redmond to visit NoA. Nowadays it's more complicated because of Covid, but I doubt they'd decide on a character and then, post-Covid, decide against it.
I also don't understand people having such pessimism towards western characters. I think what's more significant is that the character itself have such a tremendous impact that even Japan is aware of it. It is impossible to deny the amount of great publicity and sales that would come from Crash of all characters making it to Smash and being in the same game as Mario and Sonic, and it's hard to believe that Nintendo would pass up that chance to avoid working with Activision. Particularly since they have worked together before.
Regarding the controversies and the like I refuse to comment, but I also see those as insignificant to Crash. I also don't foresee this would impact sales of a DLC pass with Crash. Particularly since Crash has enough star power that you don't really think Activision when you see him... you just think of Crash. This is similar to me as the likes of Scorpion and Lara Croft, characters to embedded in gaming lore that they stand tall regardless of who owns them (though it helps for those owners to actually do something with them.)
Oh, talk about Activision... I saw someone saying this could be a case of Resident Evil where everyone expected it but nothing happened. So now to point out why it's a completely different circumstance: Resident Evil has competition with other Capcom characters (see: dante) for a game with already significant Capcom representation. The most competition Crash would have for Smash would arguably be Spyro or Tracer, neither of which are a tenth as likely as Crash. While Activision does have other more significant properties (CoD, Candy Crush), neither of these present the possibility of a character as well nor do they have the presence on Nintendo consoles that Crash has.
Want: 100%
I was once of those people who played Crash games back around when they first came out on PS1, and they were nothing short of excellent. They were simply magical times, and where Sonic was on the way out, Crash was slowly taking his place as the one to stick it to Mario and provide proper competition.
The fact that Crash returned to form so excellently these past couple years and actually has new games down the line is fantastic to me, and there is honestly no better time for this character to be included in Smash. The first pass was for me fairly low-key until Banjo stepped in and fulfilled dreams everywhere... I think the next character that can reach that high note is Crash and I believe him to be THE titan of Fighter's Pass 2.
Spyro
Chance 1%
In a world where Crash feels like he's at the cusp of joining, I just don't think there's a shred of a chance for Spyro. Their franchises pretty much existed in parallel with both dying out and coming back at roughly the same time and both winding up as part of Activision, but while both saw remasters it's Crash right now that has the most star power globally and he's the one I see taking the envelope.
As a side note, I think even Tracer is more likely than Spyro, if anything because of Overwatch being fairly popular in Japan and Overwatch having been a super popular title back in...2016 I think? Still, neither of them hold a candle to the titan Crash is right now.
Want 100%
Much like I played Crash on PS1, I also played a ton of Spyro. In fact, I think Spyro the dragon was my first PS1 game, and that first game was familiar enough to me at a certain point where I was running it and doing races with others. I admittedly never enjoyed the sequels to the same level as the first one (though in the reignited trilogy I enjoyed YotD the most), but that first game stood tall as a game I could keep coming back to for a great time, every time.
There's no doubt Spyro would be an excellent addition to Smash, I just don't think we're quite there yet. Definitely closer than we were back in Smash 4 though!
I'll actually use nominations these time since I saw someone do this one back in the paper mario day, and I'm enjoying bug fables soooo much right now
x5 Vi (Bug Fables)