GhostYB
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2018
- Messages
- 101
Oops, I saw someone say X and Y and wrote that down on accident lmaoo.He is from Sun and Moon
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Oops, I saw someone say X and Y and wrote that down on accident lmaoo.He is from Sun and Moon
You can nominate anyone you want. If they have been rated, you’ll be nominating for a rerate.Whew thank you!
What characters can I put down because it seems like 200+ days are just there and not many characters to choose?
Also, Pokemon is nothing like Fire Emblem, because unlike FE, the Pokemon reps aren't oversaturated with clones.People whining about the amount of Pokemon when Capcom was even worse with oversaturating crossover fighters with one franchise should be another thing the traditional FGC mocks Smash's fanbase for. Their rosters were smaller than Ultimate's, with way less variety in series represented. To make matters worse, the only competitively viable team in MvC2 involves X-Men characters.
Yeah as a FE fan that makes me pretty sad too lolAlso, Pokemon is nothing like Fire Emblem, because unlike FE, the Pokemon reps aren't oversaturated with clones.
Capcom's been getting a bit better about roster balance recently (starting around MvC3), but there's no doubt they went a little overboard when 70% of MvC2's roster was either a X-Men or Street Fighter character. Personally, I prefer Smash's more laissez-faire approach to characters than MvCI's strict 2 characters per series rule (mainly because it just insured we got the most boring choices from each series).People whining about the amount of Pokemon when Capcom was even worse with oversaturating crossover fighters with one franchise should be another thing the traditional FGC mocks Smash's fanbase for. Their rosters were smaller than Ultimate's, with way less variety in series represented. To make matters worse, the only competitively viable team in MvC2 involves X-Men characters.
Currently, only six Pokemon types (Ghost, Dragon, Ground, Rock, Bug, and Ice) are unrepresented with a playable character.Capcom's been getting a bit better about roster balance recently (starting around MvC3), but there's no doubt they went a little overboard when 70% of MvC2's roster was either a X-Men or Street Fighter character. Personally, I prefer Smash's more laissez-faire approach to characters than MvCI's strict 2 characters per series rule (mainly because it just insured we got the most boring choices from each series).
Not to step on the toes of anyone who feels we have too many Pokemon, but I think it's a little different than the Fire Emblem situation. Pokemon's roster tends to hit a lot more thematic categories than the current Fire Emblem crop. Granted, we're currently double dipping in Electric, Water, Fire, and Dark types, but Lycanroc doesn't really have that problem (seeing how he doesn't share his element with anybody on the roster).
I mean, I don't pay much attention to what other companies do with their own crossover fighting games; Smash is the only fighting game I play. Also just because one company does something doesn't mean everybody should follow suit.People whining about the amount of Pokemon when Capcom was even worse with oversaturating crossover fighters with one franchise should be another thing the traditional FGC mocks Smash's fanbase for. Their rosters were smaller than Ultimate's, with way less variety in series represented. To make matters worse, the only competitively viable team in MvC2 involves X-Men characters.
As an aside, I actually don't mind the number of FE reps. I think we could've gone without Corrin and the Echoes, but I don't mind them. I don't really want another FE character unless it's Lyn, though.Also, Pokemon is nothing like Fire Emblem, because unlike FE, the Pokemon reps aren't oversaturated with clones.
How’s that relevant to the topic at hand?People whining about the amount of Pokemon when Capcom was even worse with oversaturating crossover fighters with one franchise should be another thing the traditional FGC mocks Smash's fanbase for. Their rosters were smaller than Ultimate's, with way less variety in series represented. To make matters worse, the only competitively viable team in MvC2 involves X-Men characters.
Yeah, Pokémon’s worse. At least Fire Emblem characters are mostly clones (thus taking less development times), and most are by fan demand.Also, Pokemon is nothing like Fire Emblem, because unlike FE, the Pokemon reps aren't oversaturated with clones.
I just wanted to rant about everyone saying "too many Pokemon" and why I think that's wrong without the popularity argument.How’s that relevant to the topic at hand?
Only Marth and Chrom are.most are by fan demand
Roy, Ike, Lucina and Robin are also very popular either with Smash fans or with Fire Emblem fans. The only odd man out is Corrin.I just wanted to rant about everyone saying "too many Pokemon" and why I think that's wrong without the popularity argument.
Only Marth and Chrom are.
Thank you! I'm down for more Pokémon even if there's a lot of them. At most there's one semiclone of Pikachu. As for Fire Emblem, at least half of their cast is either echoes, semiclones, or take inspiration from each other. Literally all but 1 character from that franchise has a counter as their down special. Pokémon is a game all about movesets, and adding a new one always makes the game feel fresh in my opinion. Xurkitree especially would make a wild and crazy fighter in the world of Smash. Feel free to check out the support thread.Also, Pokemon is nothing like Fire Emblem, because unlike FE, the Pokemon reps aren't oversaturated with clones.
Also the Ultra Beast theme is missing, which was one I was hoping for.Seriously, the fact that Ultra Necrozma's theme isn't in is a goddamn crime.
You can say that for any character, though. Yeah, Ice Climber has a stage, but we could get another one, be it Icicle Mountain or a new one and it wouldn’t be redundant. Splatoon could get a new stage for DLC and there wouldn’t necessarily get any overlap, same for Odyssey, BotW and Castlevania.For what it's worth, the point about there not being an Alola stage yet is getting misconstrued a bit. It doesn't inherently imply there must be one in the works for DLC, or any conspiracies like that, but it does mean that if we did get one, it wouldn't be redundant or unusual compared to the others. Even the new music wouldn't be an issue, since while we got a few new remixes from base Sun and Moon, there is still so much more, especially from USUM in particular, that the base roster did not tap into in the slightest.
Seriously, the fact that Ultra Necrozma's theme isn't in is a goddamn crime.
I took it as the first pack of the 5 is a Persona 5 pack, not that there are multiple seasons. You could be right thoughAlso, Concept: More DLC is officially confirmed.
Why are you saying that? A bunch of third party rules have been broken in the past. Now, 3rd party companies can have 3 franchises represented in the game.This is very bad news for the following characters:
I'd have to be foolish to give any of them more than a one at this point. I almost consider them outright disconfirmed.
- Tails
- Dr. Eggman
- NiGHTS
- Billy Hatcher
- Sonic rep (other)
- Bayonetta rep
- ... (sigh) Arle Nadja
We've been sniped by disconfirmations several times, but I think this is the first time we've been sniped by a confirmation.Fixed Schedule through day 235
226: Joker (Persona 5)
it really does seem like it'll be entirely 3rd party from here on out. I can't see a single first party character (other than maybe Waluigi being promoted from AT) topping the absolute "WTF" factor this reveal had. With Reggie's emphasis on "fighters you would never expect," speculation has done a complete 180°. Popular and expected characters like Bandana Waddle Dee and Geno seem incredibly unlikely to me now. Bring on 2B and Sans.Every single one of the five DLC characters is going to be a third party.
Nearly every single popular first party pick seems to either be an Assist Trophy (Skull Kid, Isaac, Springman) or made into an Mii Costume, with lots of emphasis on not being playable (Rex). Really, the only big first party pick left is Bandana Waddle Dee, and I can very easily see Sakurai passing over him due to how he might think that Kirby is represented fine enough, mainly due to Kirby being the main character in the story, plus his general avoidance of newer Kirby games.
So unless we do get another Pirahna Plant "WTF?!?" character, or another character used from promotion (Edelgard? Melmetal?), I really do think its solely third parties from here on out.
As for which third parties we could get, I do think there's a whole lot to choose from:
While I do wish some more first party picks were used (still out here waiting for Karate Joe), I just don't think its happening. Very few Nintendo first parties left have the same buying power that third parties do, which I think is kind of unfortunate, but what I think doesn't really matter in the big scheme of things.
- Geno / Sora / Slime / Erdrick / Crono / Bravely Default character / new Final Fantasy character (Square Enix rep hinted at by Vergeben)
- Doomguy / Vault Boy / Dragonborn (Bethesda has talked to Nintendo about Smash)
- Rayman (Ubisoft is on board, Rabbid Peach is a spirit)
- Steve / Banjo & Kazooie / Master Chief (lots of recent Microsoft + Nintendo collaborations as of late)
- Monster Hunter / Dante / Leon Kennedy / Phoenix Wright (big Capcom picks)
- Lloyd Irving / Klonoa (big Namco picks)