CaptainAmerica
Smash Master
Master Chief
Chance: 20%
Want: 0%
Another member of the "Now that they've got a game on Switch, they should get in Smash!" crew. Not that I'm knocking that since that's the crux of the argument for one of my favorites...
Doom's got a lot going for it right now. It is one of the progenitors of the FPS genre, which is something that is not represented in Smash. Doom's got a lot from the earlier Nintendo consoles, so we do have the history argument, and the recent Doom port for Switch did very very well, and it's also got a new game on the horizon, which has a lot of hype around it. Plus, there is a decent fanbase which has popped up around it, unfortunately a bit late for the ballot though. Not to mention that curious interview with Pete Hines that Bethesda has talked to Nintendo about Smash, and yet there's nothing Beth in the base game. There are quite a few signs pointing to a potential inclusion from a Beth character.
But, I'll let my bias take over from here...
Doom is violent. Like, really really violent. True: we've got all the M-rated goodness of Snake and Bayo toned down for Smash, but Doom kinda sorta centers around its M-ratedness in a way similar to Mortal Kombat selling itself by its fatalities - yeah, it's a fighting game and doesn't need them, but take them out and people start to question it (see MKvsDC or Armageddon even removing unique fatalities). We can censor Snake and it'll still mostly feel like Snake. If we censor Doom...it'll feel a bit like generic space marine #57.
Latching onto that point, we all like to talk about how acclaimed it is, but nobody seems to talk about whether it's got worldwide appeal. We're all quick to claim that Tingle's out since America hates him, but we'll throw out characters like Doomguy without considering what Japan may think of them. Now I'm admittedly not looking very hard, but isn't it a huge stereotype that Japan's really not a fan of FPSs? Or super gritty violence in general? So do they even like him? And who's picking the DLC characters? If NoJ is involved and that's not a big player...let's just say that's not exactly looking good.
Finally, there's also the dragon in the room - now Doomguy (and Vault boy)'s definitely got the advantage over Dovahkiin just because they've been around much longer, been in more games, and have that Nintendo history. But Skyrim does have a few things on Doom....well, I'll save those arguments for the Dragonborn's day. Still, Both Doom and Fallout are not originally Bethesda properties, they were acquired, but Elder Scrolls is Bethesda through and through. If Bethesda had a choice, would they prefer their baby they made from scratch, or the one they bought? Sure, it could be irrelevant, but the meme isn't Todd Howard trying to port Doom to literally everything with a microchip. (Yeah, that meme exists too, but that's more random people porting the original Doom to various things, not Bethesda execs doing so)
Of course, there's also the dark horse FPS character in Master Chief as well, which people are also considering as an alternative to Banjo/Steve as a Microsoft rep. While people will probably come after me with pitchforks for suggesting this, there's a lot of thematic overlap between Doomguy and Master Chief (and even Samus to an extent...). NOTE THIS DOESN'T MEAN I'M STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK THOSE GAMES ARE LITERALLY THE SAME! But if I were to say that we're getting a power-armored badass marine from a Western FPS wearing a OD green metal suit and using a decently large energy gun, there's still some ambiguity who I could be referring to.
So I'll say that I wouldn't care whether or not Doomguy got in - assuming Beth's other big "D" got in first. But until I can "Fus Ro Dah!" characters off the edge of Final Destination, I'm staying off of the Doom train.
Nom: More DLC x5
Chance: 20%
Want: 0%
Another member of the "Now that they've got a game on Switch, they should get in Smash!" crew. Not that I'm knocking that since that's the crux of the argument for one of my favorites...
Doom's got a lot going for it right now. It is one of the progenitors of the FPS genre, which is something that is not represented in Smash. Doom's got a lot from the earlier Nintendo consoles, so we do have the history argument, and the recent Doom port for Switch did very very well, and it's also got a new game on the horizon, which has a lot of hype around it. Plus, there is a decent fanbase which has popped up around it, unfortunately a bit late for the ballot though. Not to mention that curious interview with Pete Hines that Bethesda has talked to Nintendo about Smash, and yet there's nothing Beth in the base game. There are quite a few signs pointing to a potential inclusion from a Beth character.
But, I'll let my bias take over from here...
Doom is violent. Like, really really violent. True: we've got all the M-rated goodness of Snake and Bayo toned down for Smash, but Doom kinda sorta centers around its M-ratedness in a way similar to Mortal Kombat selling itself by its fatalities - yeah, it's a fighting game and doesn't need them, but take them out and people start to question it (see MKvsDC or Armageddon even removing unique fatalities). We can censor Snake and it'll still mostly feel like Snake. If we censor Doom...it'll feel a bit like generic space marine #57.
Latching onto that point, we all like to talk about how acclaimed it is, but nobody seems to talk about whether it's got worldwide appeal. We're all quick to claim that Tingle's out since America hates him, but we'll throw out characters like Doomguy without considering what Japan may think of them. Now I'm admittedly not looking very hard, but isn't it a huge stereotype that Japan's really not a fan of FPSs? Or super gritty violence in general? So do they even like him? And who's picking the DLC characters? If NoJ is involved and that's not a big player...let's just say that's not exactly looking good.
Finally, there's also the dragon in the room - now Doomguy (and Vault boy)'s definitely got the advantage over Dovahkiin just because they've been around much longer, been in more games, and have that Nintendo history. But Skyrim does have a few things on Doom....well, I'll save those arguments for the Dragonborn's day. Still, Both Doom and Fallout are not originally Bethesda properties, they were acquired, but Elder Scrolls is Bethesda through and through. If Bethesda had a choice, would they prefer their baby they made from scratch, or the one they bought? Sure, it could be irrelevant, but the meme isn't Todd Howard trying to port Doom to literally everything with a microchip. (Yeah, that meme exists too, but that's more random people porting the original Doom to various things, not Bethesda execs doing so)
Of course, there's also the dark horse FPS character in Master Chief as well, which people are also considering as an alternative to Banjo/Steve as a Microsoft rep. While people will probably come after me with pitchforks for suggesting this, there's a lot of thematic overlap between Doomguy and Master Chief (and even Samus to an extent...). NOTE THIS DOESN'T MEAN I'M STUPID ENOUGH TO THINK THOSE GAMES ARE LITERALLY THE SAME! But if I were to say that we're getting a power-armored badass marine from a Western FPS wearing a OD green metal suit and using a decently large energy gun, there's still some ambiguity who I could be referring to.
So I'll say that I wouldn't care whether or not Doomguy got in - assuming Beth's other big "D" got in first. But until I can "Fus Ro Dah!" characters off the edge of Final Destination, I'm staying off of the Doom train.
Nom: More DLC x5