it's not about who's overrated, it's about who wins. vro did well and got second regardless of how good or not good ike is. i can understand having subjective interpretations based on your observations but even i'm not arrogant enough to flat out deny reality.
uh, whats do you mean with this post exactly? >_>
yes, vro got second in the first big tournament in a game no one takes seriously yet. im not denying that, but that doesnt mean that doesnt change **** about how good Ike is really.
@Reflex: Not really... while many characters are easy to play on their own, most characters require immense amounts of lab work to be fit for top level play in Marvel.
Look at Firebrand, Pheonix, Viper, Zero for characters that are "hard2play". Its not about the fact that they have hard EXECUTION (even though Viper/Zero really really do have 10x the limit wesker has) its the fact that you have to learn a very specific team and do immense work for it to be use able at top level.
Wesker on the other hand, can be fit in any position of a team, is useful for every team, is extremely easy to play and gains almost nothing from "top level" combos compared to ABCS. All his incoming mixups are super easy to learn, all his mixups with assists are easy to learn (basic left right mixup). He has no useful TAC, all his Xfactor combos are the same, is Neutral game is extremely easy and doesnt really vary against different characters.
Please think about it for a second before you post, will you?