My mildly ignorant compadre eh? And I can't keep my emotions out of a debate?
When one is mildly ignorant of the facts, yes I will call them on it, but I am sorry for letting my fellings into it, calling you my compadre was wrong.
And I suppose Krystal being Fox's love throughout the series and helps him develop ensures her a spot in Brawl? Am I obliged to see Dixie Kong then?
If Dixie was the important love interest to Donkey Knog, yes, but she wasn't and isn't nearly as individual as Krystal, let's face it: Dixie's just Diddy with diffrent hair and clothes.
Luigi... is a sidekick. Face it, you just can't get around it. Nintendo just can't go around throwing Geno in every Mario sport/spinoff there is, his storyline is very deep, and I just can't see him shooting hoops with Birdo and Yoshi. Besides, they don't feel the need to split the profits EVERY game with Square-Enix to put him in a game.
He's not just a sidekick, he's
the definitive sidekick. Him and Mario are like a package deal. You don't get one without the other (Well, most ofthe time) Both Luigi and MArio are synonomous with each other, Geno, however isn't as heavily related with Mario as Luigi is, and thusly can be left out without much regret.
Mario is a popular franchise, and that's what Geno fits into. Nice try though.
I think you mean
fit into, as in past tense, as Geno hasn't played any part in the story of any other Mario game besides that one, single, old game. Nice try though.
Yeah because Final Fantasy fans really want to see badass Cloud fighting alongside Pikachu to save Mushroom Kingdom. Both companies have stopped producing the games, because they would have to use a joint effort to get him in. Square and Nintendo, as mentioned, are on harsh terms, they just can't go throwing Geno into games. They are only now recooperating from that argument. By the way, if you haven't noticed, Cloud had a worthless 3 minute cameo as a boss in Kingdom Hearts CoM, don't even bring cameos up.
Yeah, and like anyone would wnat to see the badass Snake, Link, or Ike fighting them either... oh wait, they did. Listen, Smash Bros. doesn't want to just be "for the kids" especially when it comes down to character diversity. Smash Bros wants to be and is a fighting game made and designed for the hardcore gamer.
As for the cameo thing I was just throwing Cloud out there as an exaple of somene from Square who's waaay more popular and beneficial than Geno, I coul've said the Black Mage or even Moogle and it would've been the same thing.
Honestly, I see absolutely no reason whatsoever why either Square or Nintendo would chose the less known, less popular, less recent Geno over a more marketable character like the Black Mage or Cloud. It simply is bad business sense, why have a dried up, old, trodden on peice of gum stuck on the sidewalk that barely anyone wants let alone remembers when you could have a nice juicy, flavorful steak that everybody loves, made by a four star resteraunt?
Game & Watch isn't in his prime, and neither is Pit, or the Ice Climbers. Smash Bros. helps revive interest in characters, seeing as Game & Watch or the Ice Climbers weren't nearly as known before they hit the shelves on a Smash Bros. game.
You see, Nintendo can do that because
they own the characters and thusly didn't have to spent money to get them in. With Geno, however, they have to really pay for it and thusly would want something that will make the expense very worthwhile, Geno isn't really the best choice out there compared to the fresher, better nown characters that they could get instead.
Besides, GaW got in Melee because he's what started Nintendo, he's the guy who began Nintendo, the first of a new age, and if any retro character deserved that spot, it was him.
When speaking of cameos in a sarcastic tone, think about Cloud and his three minutes on a Nintendo console.
You really don't need to be repetitive, personally I couldn't care if Cloud get's in, all I'm saying is that there's a crapload more profitable Square characters that Nintendo could pick from rather than Geno, and anyway, I don't count handheld games as consoles anyway, personally when it comes down to the handheld maket it comes to Nintendo or nothing, so there really isn't much diversity there.
Nintendo CAN'T do it by themselves. Geno was a joint creation between SE and Nintendo, and Nintendo just can't throw him into every game, even if they wanted to.
Of course they can't just throw Geno into any game they wnated to, least of all Brawl, they'd need to do a lot of extensive confrences with Square, which currently, there is absolutely no evidence of, and besides, if Nintendo ever were going to go u to Square and ask for a representative, don't you think that Square would rather have a character that they could profit off of instead of Geno, who wouldn't give Square any new money, as they've stopped making the only game Geno's in.
Rareware absolutely BETRAYED Nintendo, their home company by selling out to Microsoft. Yes, the same people who created DK games, and Banjo games, just turned their backs on Rareware. They are pretty much at war at this point in time, don't count your lucky stars when it comes to seeing him in Brawl.
Who betrayed whom? Last I checked it was Nintendo who sold Rare to Microsoft, but nonetheless, you have a point, I personally don't see it happening, but you're missing the point. Geno's chances are hugely over estimated, as his chances are rivaled by that of Banjo, a character that nobody roots for.
Well, I don't want you to cry about me assuming your age, so I'm sorry. Geno was actually the most favored character in the Mario RPG, some people even liked him more than MARIO himself.
Still need to throw in that little barb? Honestly, I expect you to probably be just as old as I am. I liked Geno, he was a nice character, but there are tons of good characters (Saria, Toadsworth, May, Gloopy) that really didn't strike me as a character that would definitely get the honor to fight alongside the greatest heroes of all time. He just struck me as a good character, but just a character.
Sorry I didn't have time to elaborate on all the answers and further explain, but you'll get over it.
Sigh, you take your own sloth at not being able to fully answer questions and make it turn on me, as if I'd be broken up about it. This is in the sam, cruel, callous vein that the comment "Well, I don't want you to cry" spouted from. IF you need to make such snide barbs at people, maybe you need to take a look at your own emotional securities and stop criticising others about it.
'Nuff said.