I actually liked that the PS2 had a good focus on RPGs. There was well, a lot of everything on that system that made it good, and that's why it appealed to me more than the original Xbox. I admit I could have some bias towards the PS3 controller since it's pretty similar to the PS1/PS2 controllers, which I've been used to using since 1999 (though, the 360 controller is by no means bad...it's not the Jaguar). Also, I have to admit the PS3 would likely be right next to my PS2/PSX, so switching between the 3 would just be a case of switching a plug making backwards compatibility issues almost not a problem. I think there's a good bit of sticking with "the devil you know, instead of the one you don't". I mean, I've had my PS2 for like 7 years and only had one problem with it, and that was like 6 years ago. I haven't had a problem with it since, and have heard from people the PS3 has similar reliability. There've been a good bit of "Red Ring of Doom" issues with the 360 I've heard about since its release and still hear about people having them. The 360 (and the "new gaming crowd" these days) seems more for people who have no patience and just want constant flash in the games to me, not sure why.
But yeah, I like the Wii better than both systems, especially since it seems more geared towards playing games, rather than being a "multimedia platform". Really, I don't care if a system plays DVDs, music CDs, Blu-Ray, HD-DVDs, lets me surf the internet, has a keyboard/mouse compatibility or what. What really concerns me is that it plays the games for it, and plays them well.
Edit: Yeah, you're right Suo. Both are great values for different tastes, and people with those tastes probably aren't going to up and change them overnight, if at all. Kinda got carried away with all that, lol.