"a day shot SK"
Freudian slip much?
um ok so first of all. I meant to say "day shot SK", obviously noone understood my point. Which was; people were wondering if i was actually a day-shot SK, and my response to them was going to be, "what kind of GM would create a role like that." However I rethought that and said to myself that omis? seems like he would make a role like that. So I had to defend myself using diffferent logic. reread my post and hopefully yull understand.
First off, didn't care about lynching a townie? No matter how dumb a townie is, you still care that you lost one because then the mafia is closer to winning. Unless you just need to kill everyone off... then you wouldn't care.
Well I honestly didn't care much.
stuff about me role fishing
I already explained myself about this, I found what rockin did fishy, and I called him out on it. I was trying to decide whether or not I should kill rockin/jungle because of this. But I am not a very experienced mafia player, and I do not trust my gut. This is why I did not kill rockin that day and is also the reason why I came out to the town, so that my kill wouldn't be my responsibility but everyones.
Yet again I think it was fairly obvious to anyone that rockin had some sort of outside knowledge about jungle. You seemed to have conveniently left out my posts preceding the ones you quoted. I basically asked rockin if it was just his gut feeling, giving him a simple way out of the scenario but he denied that. I don't see how you do not see that as suspicious ronike.
And obviously I am going to be suspicious of the two, since neither of them died last night when it was quite obvious that Rockin had some sort of information role.
And yet even with all this fluster, he still hasn't done anything with it! So I dunno if I believe you, I'm leaning towards no...
I already said that I was just kidding about killing based on inactivity, since that would have been a terrible idea.
These two posts were made within 5 hours. Change of heart a bit too fast for my taste. Plus, he still doesn't vote even though he supports the death. Why? Maybe he wanted to be able to say he wasn't for smash's death?
Um, the dude voted for himself, that is the dumbest **** ever. And by that point he was already dead I believe and he can't take back his vote. I strongly believed he was not mafia so I did not support voting for him at all, which is why I didn't, I just thought he was being a ******* and was letting pressure get to him. It was more like a facepalm.
so smashbot is going to be lynched because he came up with a ******** theory?
Im not gonna vote for him, cuz I just don't think what hes done is that scummy.
tbh smashbots whole theory didn't seem scummy. I thought he legitly believed in his theory. And also, I didn't think scum try to pass off an idea like that just because they would know it would get shot down so hard. It just seemed like a dumb reason to lynch someone.
As you can see I strongly believed that he was not scum. So why would I vote for him. Oh and if I was an SK I would have been happy to hop on that bandwagon.
***
1) Macman was lying in order to bring about some activity.
2) Macmanis the SK and for some omis? related reason, the time he can kill changes whenever he uses his kill.
Number one: Bluffing would be ******** because obviously I would have to prove my claim by killing someone. So I doubt you legitimately think that your first option is right.
Number two: this is the only one that has any legitimate basis. However, all I did by claiming was put a target on my back for mafia, And as an sk i have to survive so why would i risk mafia killing me. Also the SK role you are proposing is kind of far fetchd.
all in all, everything you are pegging me for I have already addressed or was something you misunderstood.
ronike, you have aroused my suspicion simply because you are suspecting me. My first urge after reading your post was to kill you on the spot, to prove to you and anyone else that I'm what I say I am. However that would be a dumb move, and it would have defeated the purpose of me claiming, which was to allow the town to make the decision. And I don;t have any concrete reasoning for you being mafia.
However I wonder what you are proposing. That I should be lynched? Even if I was lying, or even if I was the SK, I offered the town an extra lynch. I do not see how that is anything but beneficial for us. If i was lying than it would be obvious because I couldn't make the kill. If I was an SK the town would still have an extra kill. Are you trying to get the town to lynch me in order to remove this advantage?
tl;dr: What were you proposing that the town should do?
TBH i care alot about activity, and I was kind of happy/annoyed when ronike made his post because it would stir activity but also because he was accusing me. I've made alot of posts about asking people to check in, just so that people could atleast post so that they wouldn't be inactive. This game was starting to bore me since nothing happened, even after I claimed.
and yaya I forgot yu were even in this game, how have I been acting scummy? Just because of what ronike said? Or do you have more to add?
I look forward to your response.
