Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Duhuhude. You don't know how dumb you look by saying this. Ness > youness is gay, everyone raved about him in the first smash but he wasn't that great, they made him even worse in melee when they should have dropped him after the first game, he's nothing but a stupid fat asian w/ magic powers that suck and he's slow and not powerful, he was never good and will never be and nintendo really went low if they incorperated him in the 3rd game. Fox is a good charicter, he was good in all the games, on of the best in all the games actually, they're just keeping mario, pikachu, kirby, and link since they're the huge Nintendo icons but really kirby and pikachu are bad, mario isn't great, link could probably be better but nintendo is scared to go out on a limb after the success of melee and try something else thats new and creative, instead they went back to the style of smash 64 which is really a step backwards from the promising future smash was heading to. i think nintendo wanted to incorperate so many new charicters into the game to add more styles and moves to the game but not disturb the moves of previous charicters which seem to be set in stone. we can only hope that other good charicters such as sheik are still in the game and that they didn't run brawl too much but it was a wise choice to take out some of the lesser charicters like yoshi.
don't tell me how dumb i look saying this, your the one who looks ******** for not only sticking up for ness.
i totaly agree with you Shadow!A character's performance should not have to be a factor in removal.
Just for you to remember: the PK Thunder third jump IS, in fact, Ness most unique and characteristic Move. it allows much more things to do with it then a usual third jump.you know your charicter shouldn't exist if you have to hit yourself with your own attack to get a third jump.
PREACH! And Ness's PK Thunder is DEFINITELY versatile if you know what you're doing. Ahh now I'm fiending to edge-guard with a PK Flash...I agree with everyone who wants to see the original SSB64 charakters in Brawl, because they are the core of the Games.
Period.
pika sucks.......because of creepy moves...........wait a minute are you telling me that a mouse with electric attacks is creepy............what about a plumber who shoots fireballs and kills a giant turtle. is that not creepy.i totaly agree with you Shadow
I can also say "Picachu suxx because he has creapy moves", because i dont like playing with fox(yeah i HATE playing with Picachu). But thats no reason to kick him from the game. I agree with everyone who wants to see the original SSB64 charakters in Brawl, because they are the core of the Games.
Period.
ROFL. but seriously lucas, you are dead wrong.Everyone needs correction now and again. Some more than others, as is the case with you. While it's apparent that your opinions about certain characters will be corrected when you decide you're tired of losing to lvl 1 CPUs and want to play an actual human being to validate your existence, I took it upon myself to correct you on something simple that will help you look less ******** when you "defend" your idiotic baseless claims: your spelling.
It's collaborations, not "colaberations."
It's characters, not "charicters."
It's incorporate, not "incorperate."
Honest mistakes, just like everything else you seem to say.
you're welcome? sorry, its just that I dont know if you are serious or not cause of the computer >_< anyway, the reason I say lucas is wrong is because we have a yoshi level, which hints to yoshi being in it. that and as well as the original 12 having the greater chance of returning than any of the rest. and also, dissing any character will get you flamed lucas. just know that.thanks 06falcon
it was just an examplepika sucks.......because of creepy moves...........wait a minute are you telling me that a mouse with electric attacks is creepy............what about a plumber who shoots fireballs and kills a giant turtle. is that not creepy.
you're welcome? sorry, its just that I dont know if you are serious or not cause of the computer >_< anyway, the reason I say lucas is wrong is because we have a yoshi level, which hints to yoshi being in it. that and as well as the original 12 having the greater chance of returning than any of the rest. and also, dissing any character will get you flamed lucas. just know that.
WTF?G&W was awesome and everything, but he falls into that category of "well, it's been fun, but I need to pick up the Watchlings from soccer practice." He has a life now and just doesn't have time to Brawl anymore.
indeed. although, I am still skepticle as to what moves they would give him (espescaly up B). that energy ball he shoots at you in OoT is a must (possable neutral B move), but thats really all I can think of for moves.... the big sword could work, but from what I remember, OoT ganondorf uses a Halberd, not a sword (I'm probably wrong, but thats what I remember anyways...). and I personaly like the WW Ganondorf design best myself, and the duel swords would be cool in my opinion.Yeah, he will get his own moveset this time. He was origionally going to, they just ran ou tof time. The chances of him returning as a clone are pretty much 0, seeing as he has far more potential than that.
agreed, new characters are more exiting. but thats not a reason to get rid of important, and popular characters characters. Ganondorf is the most recognisable (and most used) villiian in the Zelda series, and he's needed for Zelda to be fully represented. most clone characters will be removed, like Dr.Mario, Pichu, and Roy. but Ganondorf is to much of an important character to be removed. they could use WW ganondrof. it alot of aspects, it would be like a new character, seeing as he is far different from OoT ganondrof. or TP Ganondorf. they used Links TP design, so it seems like the a good possabilty (if he's even in TP that is).I don't see why they would spend the time doing an entirely new moveset for an old character when they could make an entirely new character. There are many clone characters from Melee that run into the same problem. If they want to reduce the number of clones, retooling them isn't nearly as exciting as just adding new characters. I would think that the developers of the game would better spend their time adding new characters than spend it redoing the clones from melee. That's the main reason why I think that all the clones from Melee, Ganondorf including, are getting the axe.
there will most likly be a lot more characters in brawl, then there were in melee. about 10 to 15 more characters total then melee is my guess. if thats the case, then Ganondorf isn't going anywhere. and I still don't think he would be cut, even if they didn't have that many characters. like I said before, he's just way to important to the Zelda series to be removed. he carries the triforce of Power. and anyone who has played a single Zelda game could tell you how important the triforce is to the story. it just wouldn't make sense to not include him, regardless of the amount of characters being in Brawl.I think that the likelihood of Ganondorf's inclusion is directly proportional to the number of characters in the game, and the number of new characters that they are adding. If they are being aggressive in the reduction of the number of characters and the addition of new characters, then I think he gets the boot. But if they are adding less characters and removing less characters, he is one of the first ones that they would try to keep. I was working under the impression that Brawl is going to have about the same number of characters as Melee, which would imply drastic cuts in number, that what it all really depends on.