Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
THAT'S LIFEEEEEE! I understand you don't want to. It issss kind of annoying. But hey, it's thorough and that's why I kept it. Or else if i would have done choose your favorite character, then your favorite combintation. I would get Kanto but with Venasaur, charmeleon, and squirtle. which may not be what we really wanted.
God yes. Also I'd support Peppy if it was BitF's Peppy.
They'd both be their own tiers. Do we really want FOUR characters in their own tiers?
Four? Whose the fourth one? Is it that annoying Kirby?
SSB4 alone would make E3 awesome. But that's why it won't happen.
Yeh well. I think it's possible that we'd get the Pikmin-3 sort of details on SSB4 in e3. Then, two and a half years from then we'll have it after it gets delayed 3 times. Haha, no.Four? Whose the fourth one? Is it that annoying Kirby?
SSB4 alone would make E3 awesome. But that's why it won't happen.
In that case, I demand a fifth tier, with Cranky having it to himself. It can be called "Fourth Wall" tier.
Cards eh? I wouldn't mind if they went like this
I totally agree with you there. Over 700 trophies and they barely cover certain series. Heck, I was also disappointed when I saw the Fire Emblem trophy collection. What happened to Marth's two games? Better yet... what happened to most of the FE series except for the games Ike was in?
It's still too early. Sakurai said that he wasn't even going to think about a possible SSB4 until Project Sora (AKA Kid Icarus: Uprising) was finished. With that being said, the earliest that they'd even begin development for it would be Q4 this year which means that any announcement pertaining to it wouldn't be announced until E3 2012 at the earliest.
I have. It's a fun romp but I doubt that it will stand out as one of the major Kirby games. Prince Fluff is the equivalent of Gooey in Kirby's Dreamland 3 so there really aren't that many characteristics that set him aside from Kirby. Besides, Kirby already has enough reps. You have the main three characters already and anything added on top of that would pretty much be overkill.
Um Project Sora is the name of the developer Sakurai is now with, it's not the codename for the new Kid Icarus game.
Overkill? That's a harsh word for ONE more character. I think of extra characters as icing on the smash cake.
Then again, so long as the character is deserving ENOUGH. I mean I wouldnt want the new Mario character to be a koopa, or a Shy Guy. That would be lame.
Not, it was (Iwata even called it Project Sora before it was revealed
Uhhhh, let's not use Capcom as an example of chosing good rosters. Marvel vs Capcom 3 is full of fillers and the decision to leave out Megaman was stupid to say the least. Sakurai does a much better job picking characters.
This ain't MvC3, son! And considering you can make anyone into something new, it's really not the best criteria for adding characters.
It wouldn't be overkill if adding characters was a simple process, if we weren't already somewhat packed in terms of roster size, and if there weren't tons of other characters and series that can provide much better contributions towards the cast.
Do you know why Megaman was cut? And what are these fillers? Let me know and I'll see if I agree.
That's not entirely true. If Captain Falcon was a grappler, would that be faithful to his games? Sure, he didn't have anything going into SSB64, but the spirit of the F-Zero games - speed- is in his playstyle.
Rumors say Megaman was cut because he wasn't unique. The official talk was because they'd have to recreate the character (they are doing that with Jill) and he'd have to have a lot of moves (Dante has 40+)
Okay, I'll bite: how does this help the argument that adding characters for playstyle/uniqueness is a better decision than adding characters for the characters themselves?
Well this is just nitpicking. I like his Smash self compared to EB, and frankly having shields and buffs wouldn't be as fun as just shooting fire and lightning. He can cure himself already anyway.
Sorry, Toise I was at a play.
oh ho ho, you sly dog!
Notice the bold? I've seen her gameplay. Yes, she doesn't play like Hulk. But your missing the point. The point is "Is She Hulk a character that would make people interested in this game?" The answer is no. Most people who only have a passing knowledge of Marvel would just see her as Hulk with boobs. In the same vein, there are other characters they could have added that would be more interesting. She Hulk is in the game because of the "She," part. This isn't how you make a good roster.
Remember they added two X-Men characters no one really likes (X23 and Sentinel). There is room for these characters.
I'm not suggesting this at all. Ideally, you should get the beloved characters in and get them trying to play differently, or at least where it makes sense. I.e., people would be forgiving if Luigi plays similarly to Mario because it's always been that way, but not with Ganondorf being like Capt. Falcon. Then you have your other characters to add because they'd be unique and/or surprise picks like the Ice Climbers.
Is there an actual character in Monster Hunter or is it that type of game where you create your own character?
Arcadenik, when every anyone says something, you blow it far out of proportion.
I'd like that more than the realistic, washed out look Brawl has. Although, Wario Land Shake It was done with hand drawn sprites. For a cast of 35+ characters, it'd be a of effort to animate these characters compared to using 3D models.
There is your problem there. Niche implies "small," Focusing on a small segment gets you no where. Focusing on the larger whole is what gets you somewhere. This is why Smash Brothers does well and Marvel vs Capcom does not. Of course, it all boils down to the fact that you want Nintendo to be like Capcom.
