You're not chiming in because you're not actually bringing anything to the discussion of what SE would do. Your first post was just "doesn't matter what Square-Enix says, Sakurai won't allow it." And you're not saying which characters Sakurai wouldn't allow, just the fact that Sakurai would turn them down immediately. Worse, it's all entirely based off of your whole "I know who Sakurai would accept because I know how Japan works" spiel.
It makes as much sense as me going "who would win, Ali or Tyson?" and you come in with "doesn't matter, God calls all the shots and they're both going to Hell when they die."
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/chiming+in
1. To interrupt the speech of others, especially with an unwanted opinion.
2. To join in harmoniously.
Basically, you come into a discussion. I chimmed in whether you like it or not. You don't have to be uppity about that.
Also, here is my first post.
The problem is it would never be what Square Enix wants, but what Sakurai wants. Snake was added because a friend of his asked for it. Sonic was added because everyone wanted him. Neither instance has him going to the company and asking for anyone. He asked for specific characters. Sakurai does not see it as adding a Square Enix characters, he sees it as adding X. So, saying which Square Enix character will get in is irrelevant. Saying X may get it is relevant.
How does any of that relate to what you just said?
How obvious does it need to be for you?Sakurai outright says "we're looking at more 3rd party characters," "we're hoping more 3rd parties are interested," "we're still willing to put in more," and "no other companies ended up contacting us, oh well."
I know you want to think it's a friends/invite only type of deal, but it's been made abundantly clear that the door was open and no one showed up.
Your trying to prove global warming while I'm talking about the war of 1812.
None of your post actually related to what I said.
Let me show you using something called Hypothesis test.
Not matter what you may say, my reasoning is logical.My assumption is based on evidence.
You may disagree with it, but my assumption is logical. There are two third parties that got in for two distinct reasons while a plethora of others didn't.
All which was based on on thing: Evidence. Random snippets.
My assumption is that these are the only ways that third parties get in because that is how the only third party characters got in. The rest is just assumption
There is method A (Sakurai knows the person with the character) or B (the character is really popular). Could there be a C. Yes. Is there evidence to say there is a C. NO.
Here is the thing. There is no evidence of a third one. Look at your quote again. Did you ever see a way there could be a third method. All of them can be chopped up to the two I've mentioned before
Never did you attempt to prove that there is a third method, and that was what the replies were about. You've given anecdotes, and you've given quotes, but do any of them prove there is a third method?
Did you even know what I was actually talking about?
If I say nothing, it's in response to nothing. Your "knowledge" of Japanese business, like most of the stuff you post here, is built off of things you picked up from VGChartz, Malstrom's blog, Wikipedia, and random scraps from the internet. And it's all painted through the lens of someone who doesn't understand the value in keeping 3rd party characters around to begin with. So basically you're full of crap.
What's odd is how you're ignoring what Sakurai himself has actually said on the subject. Even as a googly-eyed parrot, you're not doing a very good job.
Oh, and take Japan Today in college. Good class.
Again, did you know what I was talking about. It was the very last sentence and not hard to miss.
Your entire replies have been assumption about me, what I think, or what I said. This post alone.
-You didn't understand what "chimed in means"
-You skewed what I said in the very first post.
-You didn't know I was talking about "proof" of method 3+ not "it's been made abundantly clear that the door was open and no one showed up. "
-You assume everything I know comes from four sources. Know me better and you'd know I get a lot of my info from instructors and general know how.
All the stuff I told you about East Asia came from a Chinese PhD from Princeton who lived in Japan. He teaches Global Wealth and Power and Japan Today. The Hypothesis stuff came from Statistics, as I used I mentions it's from Statistics.
My point was lost a long time ago. The point was I disagreed with how the conversation was going, and it turned into a monster.
@Starphoenix: I wanted to mention the guest thing one more time, but I doubt I'll ever do it.
As for the music thing, well that's simple. Music, I think, is food for the soul. It can make you happy in bad time, and feel the sorrow of others. It drives emotion. It's just awesome.