Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
What's that supposed to be?![]()
So I heard there was some talk of Old Pokemon?
What's that supposed to be?
Also, unless Lucario reaches amazingly popular status in the next few years, he'll probably be cut.
In what ways?Useful info: Pokemon went downhill after the first 250.
Everything lost it's novelty. The first 150 were great because it was somewhat groundbreaking. The next 100 were even better because the hype of a sequel to one of the best games of all time was huge. And it lived up to the hype. After 250, the Pokemon had lost the novelty in many people's eyes as an RPG and was really just more of the same.In what ways?
Well, not everything can stay a fad forever I guess.Everything lost it's novelty. The first 150 were great because it was somewhat groundbreaking. The next 100 were even better because the hype of a sequel to one of the best games of all time was huge. And it lived up to the hype. After 250, the Pokemon had lost the novelty in many people's eyes as an RPG and was really just more of the same.
My two cents.
Edit: And I hope you were joking when you asked what that creature was.
Either I'm getting trolled hard, or the point made about old characters not being as popular a few pages back was proven.And I can't really see the picture, so....I guess it's a Pokemonz?
I meant all I can see is a red X.Either I'm getting trolled hard, or the point made about old characters not being as popular a few pages back was proven.
Either way, it's Slowpoke, one of the original 150.
Show me yourEither I'm getting trolled hard, or the point made about old characters not being as popular a few pages back was proven.
Either way, it's Slowpoke, one of the original 150.
I humbly agree, SirKibble.While I agree thatVulpixthe first 150 were the best, I still like the new Pokemon, for the most part. It's just that most of us who were with Pokemon from the beginning have a deeper appreciation forBlastoisethe first 150 than some of the Pokemon newcomers. It's like anything, though, those who knew them loveVaporeonthe classics.
So, what you're saying is, the games didn't get worse or anything, but people just got tired of them. Therefore, it wasn't pokemon that went downhill, it was people's opinion of it.Everything lost it's novelty. The first 150 were great because it was somewhat groundbreaking. The next 100 were even better because the hype of a sequel to one of the best games of all time was huge. And it lived up to the hype. After 250, the Pokemon had lost the novelty in many people's eyes as an RPG and was really just more of the same.
That's pretty much correct. Although if the creators added more new things to do rather than just like 400 new creatures, that would help the game go uphill.So, what you're saying is, the games didn't get worse or anything, but people just got tired of them. Therefore, it wasn't pokemon that went downhill, it was people's opinion of it.
FARFETCH'D!****it why did my image not work.
Anyway it's totally obvious that the best Pokemon ever was Psyduck. Not only was he mentally unstable, he was a freakin' DUCK.
Just how many DUCK Pokemon are there? Not many.
I stopped after Gold/Silver. I tried Pearl but then I realized 'Wow, this is the exact same thing as the last 5'.FARFETCH'D!
Just curious, what's the last Pokemon gme you played?
Of course, down at the very core it will always be the same (that's what spin-offs are for), but there have been many, many changes since then. I skipped the 3rd gen and picked up Pearl and even borrowed my friend's Sapphire over the summer to play through it, and it's all still as addicting as it was in the beginning for me (argh!)I stopped after Gold/Silver. I tried Pearl but then I realized 'Wow, this is the exact same thing as the last 5'.
I'm sure FE fans should feel the same way.I stopped after Gold/Silver. I tried Pearl but then I realized 'Wow, this is the exact same thing as the last 5'.
Hmm wow, what is this "Underground" of which you speak?I'm sure FE fans should feel the same way.
Anyway, there are some really major improvements added in Pearl. The touchscreen system is just sublime for battles, and of course there is the underground, which could be released as a game in itself.
+physical and special attack split, abilities, wireless/online battling, contests (even though they're a bit campy), online trading, breeding improvements, new evolution methods, and most importantly, cool new PokemonI'm sure FE fans should feel the same way.
Anyway, there are some really major improvements added in Pearl. The touchscreen system is just sublime for battles, and of course there is the underground, which could be released as a game in itself.
Of course you do. Who couldn't agree with that?I humbly agree, SirKibble.
This is very true. I think that's probably Pokemon's only weakness, is that it's something people can get tired of, because the core of the game has to stay the same. You can't change it, really. But that's also what makes it so great. Go figure...So, what you're saying is, the games didn't get worse or anything, but people just got tired of them. Therefore, it wasn't pokemon that went downhill, it was people's opinion of it.
Just trying to be the devil's advocate here. What you are saying has nothing to actually do with the quality of the game (Which certainly went up, what with balance and graphical improvements and such), or the pokemon (Which is completely based on opinion.).
You would also have to be capable of having 6 people controlling at the same time for this too be a good idea.6 characters on the screen
Just like the MegaMan series...This is very true. I think that's probably Pokemon's only weakness, is that it's something people can get tired of, because the core of the game has to stay the same. You can't change it, really. But that's also what makes it so great. Go figure...
Just like the MegaMan series...![]()
You're both wrong. Dratini is the best.Dragonair is cooler.![]()
And I don't think this thread has been on topic since page 200 or so.a lil offtopic but...
Yep. I'm excited for that 8-bit MM9 game coming out on the VC! Brings back the same, core gameplay I had loads of fun with as a kid
Also, StarFox does not deserve any more than three reps, and this is coming from a StarFox fanboy. Repost the rest of that where you actually spell out your words, so my eyes don't bleed.lrn2grammar
Opinions are in bold.Okay i have a few things to adress first.
I don't and have never liked the idea of cutting characters so if nintendo was smart they wouldnt cut people, especially bcuz this time there aren't any real clones except link and tlink.
I'm not big on the idea of different characters as Alt Costumes. Mt reasoning is that it just isn;t that character. Take Peach Daisy, when i play the daisy colors, it doesn't feel like ur playing daisy bcuz its just peach dressed as here. Daisy isn't that much asked for like other people. An alt is good, because she's really not that important. At all. Hell, Rosalina's more important now. She has the same voice and moves and you just feel as if your playing as peach, not daisy. I do however like the idea of alternate costumes, however in the respect of an actual different costume for the character. Like Ness and Ness in his PJ's like at the begining of earthbound. Or link in the magical armour Mario as he doc, Marth in his lord clothes Samus any variation of her suit, the light one would be kickass, etc.
People that were cut last time all can easily be put back in in different ways. The doc could be a n alternate costume bcuz it is still mario. Pichu, could be tranfereed over to Pulse and Minun Plusle and Minun were pretty much confirmed to be Random. Since they only have one spot and since random is missing a spot and since no one really cared about them before people found out their names were in Brawl's data. Not even the Pokemon community., a character that ppl do seem to want and i think it would be cool to have another tandom character plus there not
1st gen. Roy they can put back in, then add lyn for a total of 4 fire emblem characters. Is Lyn really THAT popular? I can maybe understand Roy, but Lyn is just...eh...Mewtwo, put him back, the only evil pokemon and the fact that everyone wasnt happy he was cut is enough reason for him to be back. Ylink is tlink IMO. No. Young Link is a younger version of Link. Toon Link is different Link, especially from TP and is freaking awesome. Don't know much about storylines and such, but aren't those two completely unrelated?
By the way new character i want, Toad(its overdue) Not gonna happen... Birdo I'd be very disturbed., Vaati Can't argue with you cause I have no idea who he is..., Midna Does she have a workable moveset without Wolf Link? Everybody seems to suggest her with WL..., Paula No idea, Claus No chance, since he's hardly popular, Krystal, Leon, Pather(You can have a Starfox vs Starwolf battle 3 on 3 i'll explian a bit lower) 6 Star Fox representatives? I think 4 should be its maximum. It's not THAT popular, you know? Other series deserve characters much more. Dixie, Krool,Mewtwo, Pulse and Minum Don't think they have much chance, plus IC should be the only ones of this kind., Roy Lyn, Dark Samus, Ridley(they can make it work) Yes. They can.Dynablade(a strech but would be cool plus make the kirby series equal 4 reps) Who knows? Is he really that popular? Lip Would she have a workable moveset?, Megaman I'm done arguing with this one. Maybe he won't be so bad., and Bomberman As much as I want him, that's just stretching it a bit.. The people I chose were bcuz of two reasons, one alot are girls bcuz theres a serious lack of them, two all series have an even # of reps this way and have a respective partner, Mario=Luigi Peach=Toad Ness=Paula Zelda=Midna Ganon=Vaati ect.Aswell as popularity and credibility, the only strech is dynablade, thats just my own personal want character. Honerable metions, waluigi No. He should be playable. Deserves it much more than Star Fox characters, even if he's only in crappy sports games., geno Don't think so since Square Enix likes to be a*****,black shadow You make sense, nabooru. No idea.
Changes, Ganon gets own moveset like seriously, Roy new movset, give paula ness' pk moves, and give ness his ones from his game, same goes to lucas. Link make him better, collectivlty through out smash he has been the worst character. I could go into alot of specifics but these would be the main and biggest ones.
This is simply a theory of mine and that is about the multi man melee. When i look at this and the fact that they have 6 characters on the screen it leads to me thinking that they were flirting around the idea of have 6 fighters on the screen at the time of melee. When you look at melee they had some very simple graphic and designed wire frames. There movesets were diminished. Meaning they used simple proggraming to achieve their test run at the idea. It worked well there was no lag, or freezes during the multiman melee in melee so they kept it for the next game to flirt with the idea more. Brawl came and now its more like the FreeForAllmode . They made it so that three characters could be on the screen with 3 polygons.(2 ppl playing and the random opponent who drops in)Oppose to melee where they only had one.(one person playing) They also made it possible for 2 ppl to use controlers and put in commands along with the 4 computerize polygons inputs, thus testing if it could hadle all they infomation, which it does. The polygons are more graphic oppose to the wire frames thus seeing if the game could handle that, it does. With this i believe that with changing technology, they can achieve there goal of having 6 fighters on the screen at one time.
To me i think they will have 6 fighter on the screen next time. Sakurai said that he doesn't want to make a game simple with more characters, but new ideas and new gamplay, so what better way to alter the gameplay then to change the format of the fights from 4 to 6? Like i said above you could have A Star fox vs Star wolf match, or a mario luigi yoshi, vs wario bowswer, birdo. Think of the possibliities. Too confusing.
P.S. Change it back so your records show computer ko's with me some characters have like 4 ko's, i liked it better the other way
It has. We've been arguing what we would like in the next game.And I don't think this thread has been on topic since page 200 or so.
Which the Wii is capable of, actually.You would also have to be capable of having 6 people controlling at the same time for this too be a good idea.
O rly? Well, shows how much I know. Anyway, imagine a 7 player free-for-all...then being the first one out of stocks.Which the Wii is capable of, actually.
With wireless, that's really not much of an issue. All three current-gen consoles have it in them to support seven players (I think), while the PS3 might be able to do eight or something. Anyway, point made.
Which is probably why nobody's really attempted it yet. It's obviously possible to do in Smash Bros. (6 players, that is), due to Multi-Man Brawl. I don't think they should just up the max count to 6 for SSB4, but they could certainly add it as a new mode, with limited options.O rly? Well, shows how much I know. Anyway, imagine a 7 player free-for-all...then being the first one out of stocks.