rPSIvysaur
[ɑɹsaɪ]
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2009
- Messages
- 16,415
Easiest character to use effectively would probably be better phrased.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
But that's not true at all .Kirbeh's easy enough, and I almost wish he was harder... we kirby mains aren't as rare as we used to be... but MK isn't far behind. The difference is that while both are easy to learn, Kirby is harder to master, while MK's techs are pretty simple. Another major difference is that to compete with Kirby, you have to devote a lot of time and energy to Kirby-specific traits, while MK is easy enough to "pick up and play" and still be able to dominate most of the cast.
Man the **** up!
You gave a reason as to why what I say is right (although u neglect that fox is a fast faller that gets punished harder than most of the cast by all of the cast for simple mistakes). Therefore I'm still right.That's true of almost any character. Melee is just harder than brawl in general. In comparison though yeah I think MK is harder to play and compete on a professional level with. Fox is harder because the game is harder lol.
That's cute. Pretending like your consistent with your cgs.Also, when MK miss-spaces something against me he dies . Relying on his moveset isn't going to help you that much against top players. You have to understand a lot of match-ups and learn what people are going to punish you for etc etc it takes time and experience against good players.
Huh... that is really weird... We actually proved that metaknight is broken beyond even Akuma.
Frame-perfect arguments?Ew no. How about we turn those LGLs off and you tell me again after 1 second of tornado, 3 seconds of running to the edge, and 7:59:56 of frame perfect planking?
where the **** have you beenWhy is this even relevant discussion? Even one of the mega mods is contributing to the off topic bs in this thread. Seriously, make this thread more organized or close it. Or you could make this the official troll thread. I think we could use one of those.
This depends on whether we're talking about on a basic superficial level or an actual viable tournament level. Kirby is simpler, but a basic MK would still be more effective than a well understood kirby at the same level.I just really disagree with MK being the easiest character to use.
Kirby?
If I didn't want to namedrop and offend people I could name instances where "not top players" have used MK (even if only for a game/set) to influence their placing in tournament where they otherwise wouldn't have defeated someone. You can probably find these all the time, just look at tourney results where players have MK after their main but needed him to win a certain matchup or against a certain player. Or when players switch to MK after losing with their main, even if they've been using their main longer, MK is just better.But that's not true at all .
Who are these people picking up MK and dominating the cast at tournaments?
Anyone? Yes, top players can pick up MK and do well. THEY ARE TOP PLAYERS. Random people who switch from their main to MK are not going to see instant success and it's annoying that it's implied that happens all the time when it's pretty much never happened.
... Fast fallers are easier for certain characters to combo, not all. Floaty characters like peach are combo fodder for fox/marth/falcon etc while fast fallers require you to read techs and DI unless you have a chaingrab or are falco.Man the **** up!
You gave a reason as to why what I say is right (although u neglect that fox is a fast faller that gets punished harder than most of the cast by all of the cast for simple mistakes). Therefore I'm still right.
Only reason I'm not consistent is because I don't play very often. Before my last tournament I practiced some and only dropped one chaingrab the entire tournament.That's cute. Pretending like your consistent with your cgs.
I didn't even want to make this thread. But otherwise mk topics keep popping up everywhere :/.Why is this even relevant discussion? Even one of the mega mods is contributing to the off topic bs in this thread. Seriously, make this thread more organized or close it. Or you could make this the official troll thread. I think we could use one of those.
And you don't think this happens with other characters? Cause I've seen it happen several times. Also, I've had quite a few MK mains switch away from mk to snake or another character after playing me in tournament lol.This depends on whether we're talking about on a basic superficial level or an actual viable tournament level. Kirby is simpler, but a basic MK would still be more effective than a well understood kirby at the same level.
If I didn't want to namedrop and offend people I could name instances where "not top players" have used MK (even if only for a game/set) to influence their placing in tournament where they otherwise wouldn't have defeated someone. You can probably find these all the time, just look at tourney results where players have MK after their main but needed him to win a certain matchup or against a certain player. Or when players switch to MK after losing with their main, even if they've been using their main longer, MK is just better.
It does, but not to the same extent. Sure in your case, but you use ice climbers which is going to create "not usual" situations due to the nature of the matchup. I could probably prove it happens more with MK simply because more people use MK (It could also be argued that more people use MK for that reason). I'm sure someone could cook up the number of top players that sub MK in comparison to every other character rather easily using the player ranking chart, and it probably doesn't include everyone who uses MK on an occasional basis.And you don't think this happens with other characters? Cause I've seen it happen several times. Also, I've had quite a few MK mains switch away from mk to snake or another character after playing me in tournament lol.
It doesn't matter. If Ally can put years into getting good at Snake and a few weeks into learning MK and be just as good with both characters, there's a serious problem.But that's not true at all .
Who are these people picking up MK and dominating the cast at tournaments?
Anyone? Yes, top players can pick up MK and do well. THEY ARE TOP PLAYERS. Random people who switch from their main to MK are not going to see instant success and it's annoying that it's implied that happens all the time when it's pretty much never happened.
I don't know anything about melee outside of marth/sheik/fox/falco/falcon. lol... Fast fallers are easier for certain characters to combo, not all. Floaty characters like peach are combo fodder for fox/marth/falcon etc while fast fallers require you to read techs and DI unless you have a chaingrab or are falco.
LMAO!! I was just grasping at straws. XD I didn't even know that.Only reason I'm not consistent is because I don't play very often. Before my last tournament I practiced some and only dropped one chaingrab the entire tournament.
I could have sworn I posted in this thread about how someone should lead the discussion going on in here. But I don't see it anymore... does this thread actually swallow useful posts? Anyway I thought I suggested that we should have weekly discussions about different popular points in this argument. Then we can have summaries put in the OP and ratios giving the general idea of how many people agree and disagree. Similar to matchup discussions.I didn't even want to make this thread. But otherwise mk topics keep popping up everywhere :/.
Fair enough.It does, but not to the same extent. Sure in your case, but you use ice climbers which is going to create "not usual" situations due to the nature of the matchup. I could probably prove it happens more with MK simply because more people use MK (It could also be argued that more people use MK for that reason). I'm sure someone could cook up the number of top players that sub MK in comparison to every other character rather easily using the player ranking chart, and it probably doesn't include everyone who uses MK on an occasional basis.
Yeah, good thing that hasn't happened huh?It doesn't matter. If Ally can put years into getting good at Snake and a few weeks into learning MK and be just as good with both characters, there's a serious problem.
lol I noticedI don't know anything about melee outside of marth/sheik/fox/falco/falcon. lol
I know, it's more fun playing along. I'm used to doing it on gamefaqs not here though lol.LMAO!! I was just grasping at straws. XD I didn't even know that.
Dang, my trollin's on that other ****. XD
I'll think of something.I could have sworn I posted in this thread about how someone should lead the discussion going on in here. But I don't see it anymore... does this thread actually swallow useful posts? Anyway I thought I suggested that we should have weekly discussions about different popular points in this argument. Then we can have summaries put in the OP and ratios giving the general idea of how many people agree and disagree. Similar to matchup discussions.
or this can just be a good thread for me to practice my trolling. I am getting rusty.
It doesn't matter. If Ally can put years into getting good at Snake and a while on Captain Falcon and be just as good with both characters, there's a serious problem.It doesn't matter. If Ally can put years into getting good at Snake and a few weeks into learning MK and be just as good with both characters, there's a serious problem.
All are 50-50 even MU's.lol you most likely dont play melee marth jigg's and falco counter him not hard but they do.
He has 3 even MU's. No "bad" MU's.He doesn't have "counters" but at least he has bad and/or even matchups. Is that really so much to ask for from mk?
But none of which are 50-50 also fox and or jiggs doesnt have 3 or 4 autowin stages so they arent really the same now are they?All are 50-50 even MU's.
He has 3 even MU's. No "bad" MU's.
No i mean the melee character are 50-50 and MK doesnt have any 50-50 they are all 55-45 or better.Actually they are 50-50, unless melee players consider 60-40 slight advantage.
Ally's Captain Falcon lost to Meniel's Ike. ggMK can't be justice cause hes not on Captain Falcons team at all times and Captain Falcon's ally is justice!
I said and/or. Anyway some people think that falco is bad for fox. Some ppl think marth is bad for fox too (I think its even personally).All are 50-50 even MU's.
He has 3 even MU's. No "bad" MU's.
I agree with this except for the stages part.The game would not be amazing with him gone, most of the other best characters are just camping and chain grabbing. There needs to be less gay stages on. I voted against Rainbow, Brinstar, Norfair, and Green Greens being counterpick stages, but they put them all on anyways.
But thats also japan and japanese player are so campy its insane there is a reason pit is so high on their tier list.I agree with this except for the stages part.
Might as well keep them in for the sake of variety.
Don't believe me about the game not being amazing without him gone? Well watch this match.
A clip of Brawl without MK.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QijsuAnngSY
Exaggeration I know, but something to consider.
Also, I'm neutral.
This.But thats also japan and japanese player are so campy its insane there is a reason pit is so high on their tier list.
No, it's not something to consider, and it's foolish for you to even post that.I agree with this except for the stages part.
Might as well keep them in for the sake of variety.
Don't believe me about the game not being amazing without him gone? Well watch this match.
A clip of Brawl without MK.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QijsuAnngSY
Exaggeration I know, but something to consider.
Also, I'm neutral.
Fair enough.But thats also japan and japanese player are so campy its insane there is a reason pit is so high on their tier list.
probably any character with a reflector shield is probably high because they cant be camped lolFair enough.
Would this also explain why Fox is high over there too?
This. I'm kinda baffled by all these remarks about how supposedly easy MK is to play or pick up. It just doesn't match reality. He's not super exotic or complex, but learning MK isn't something you can do in a day. MK has great tools, but that there's a lot to using them; that's what separates M2K from the kid down the street who thinks he's M2K.Believe it or not you can't have mediocre spacing with MK and do well, people will destroy you lol.
Errr... then why wouldn't he do well he're? They're still pretty abundant.Fox is high on japanese tier list because he does well vs Snake and MK which are abundant in japan.
or maybe because the japanese fox's dont have to deal with stupid lol match ups (pika/shiek/ice) as much as we do >.>i don't know man, maybe we have different playstyles and stuff. maybe their foxes are just better than ours? we'll never know unless we play them