• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official MBR 2010 NTSC Tier List

DoH

meleeitonme.tumblr.com
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
7,618
Location
Washington, DC
Has Fox ever won like a major? I think the closest thing was Jman at DGDT Jeff but that was more of a regional
 

KirbyKaze

Smash Legend
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
17,679
Location
Spiral Mountain
DGDTJ was nice but was missing M2K, Mango (Scorpion Master and Mango are different players), Armada, and Dr. Peepee.

OC3, conversely, had most of the top players of its time at it (all they were really missing was KDJ and Azen).
 

ShroudedOne

Smash Hero
Premium
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
5,493
We just don't have enough Fox players guys!

Not going to really enter the discussion, but I could easily make another graph that says you're wrong. Besides, it's been covered. People suck. Horribly.
 

ShroudedOne

Smash Hero
Premium
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
5,493
Well then, Bones, reference the data. Gosh. Didn't school teach you anything? SOURCES, man, SOURCES.

Is this a tournament? Gathered from the list of entrants? Or is this from SSPD (whose data is kind of questionable)?
 

ShroudedOne

Smash Hero
Premium
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
5,493
Is every player who has ever entered a tournament included? Or just people from 2008 and up? I'm not saying that the data you'd get will change much (I don't suspect it will), but you can see the problem with including every single person who has ever entered a tournament, if we're supposed to be looking at the current metagame.

I dunno, I'm just not the type of person who is satisfied with just a graph (and nothing else). Don't mean to get on your case.
 

ShroudedOne

Smash Hero
Premium
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
5,493
Is every player who has ever entered a tournament included? Or just people from 2008 and up? I'm not saying that the data you'd get will change much (I don't suspect it will), but you can see the problem with including every single person who has ever entered a tournament, if we're supposed to be looking at the current metagame.

I dunno, I'm just not the type of person who is satisfied with just a graph (and nothing else). Don't mean to get on your case.
I don't see how you missed it, but ok.
 

Bing

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
4,885
Location
St.Catharines, Ontario, Canada
It honestly doesnt surprise me that Fox doesnt win many nationals.

I mean the characters requires such a high level of tech skill and just mental energy that by the time you get towards the end of the night, were(Fox mains) are exhausted.

Fox is the best character when you look at his MUs and abilities on paper, he is the best character, but because of the fact that he is controlled by humans with limitations, its holding back his true potential.

Thats just my two cents.
 

RaphaelRobo

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
2,833
In that case, wouldn't that mean that top level play holds fox back? And therefore Fox shouldn't be number 1 on the tier list, because he isn't the best character under top level play?
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
In that case, wouldn't that mean that top level play holds fox back? And therefore Fox shouldn't be number 1 on the tier list, because he isn't the best character under top level play?
i'd give you a donut but i'm pretty sure someone would ***** about it.
 

Bones0

Smash Legend
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
11,153
Location
Jarrettsville, MD
It honestly doesnt surprise me that Fox doesnt win many nationals.

I mean the characters requires such a high level of tech skill and just mental energy that by the time you get towards the end of the night, were(Fox mains) are exhausted.

Fox is the best character when you look at his MUs and abilities on paper, he is the best character, but because of the fact that he is controlled by humans with limitations, its holding back his true potential.

Thats just my two cents.
Every character is held back by human limitations. Why is Fox's difficulty discounted as a factor in his tier placement?
 

john!

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 19, 2006
Messages
8,063
Location
The Garden of Earthly Delights
bowesr is theoretically one of the top three characters, but he is too difficult for any human to play at that level.

if one claims that we should ignore character difficulty when making a tier list, then they should also claim that bowser is in the top 3.
 

TheCrimsonBlur

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
3,406
Location
LA, CA near Santa Monica
It honestly doesnt surprise me that Fox doesnt win many nationals.

I mean the characters requires such a high level of tech skill and just mental energy that by the time you get towards the end of the night, were(Fox mains) are exhausted.

Fox is the best character when you look at his MUs and abilities on paper, he is the best character, but because of the fact that he is controlled by humans with limitations, its holding back his true potential.

Thats just my two cents.
I hate this god damn argument

Especially when you watch late bracket matches and top Foxes aren't messing up tech skill any more than usual

They are just getting outspaced, outpunished, and just flat out ***** because they are the worse player

Does that make Fox as a character worse, or the players? I don't know. But I sure as hell don't buy that a Fox is more "exhausted" than I am if I just trudged through 20+ mins of Marth/Samus
 

Bing

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
4,885
Location
St.Catharines, Ontario, Canada
I hate this god damn argument

Especially when you watch late bracket matches and top Foxes aren't messing up tech skill any more than usual

They are just getting outspaced, outpunished, and just flat out ***** because they are the worse player

Does that make Fox as a character worse, or the players? I don't know. But I sure as hell don't buy that a Fox is more "exhausted" than I am if I just trudged through 20+ mins of Marth/Samus
I lol'd at that end part.
And Im not saying its the only thing, or anything like that, I just feel that its possible that fatigue does have a factor on spacies performance. As it does everyone though, which I never said it doesnt.
 

JPOBS

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
5,821
Location
Mos Eisley
the worse thing about fox at high level play is seriously that:
1. he has no range
2. he dies consistently from bnb combos from like the entire cast
3. MOST IMPORTANTLY his combo game is full of holes and sequence breaks because of the mechanics of his moves (reset on landing, SDI etc)

i dont actually think fox is 4th or 5th, no. But im not surprised he doesn't ever win either. He can be first on the tierlist but in our heart of hearts we know the truth
 

Bing

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
4,885
Location
St.Catharines, Ontario, Canada
the worse thing about fox at high level play is seriously that:
1. he has no range
2. he dies consistently from bnb combos from like the entire cast
3. MOST IMPORTANTLY his combo game is full of holes and sequence breaks because of the mechanics of his moves (reset on landing, SDI etc)

i dont actually think fox is 4th or 5th, no. But im not surprised he doesn't ever win either. He can be first on the tierlist but in our heart of hearts we know the truth
I agree actually


Also you can post that there are so many fox mains over 90% of the cast but one thing that doesnt get mentioned is that we play each other in bracket so often that after round 1. like 45% of Fox mains(Who made bracket atleast) are gone. lmao
 

TheCrimsonBlur

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
3,406
Location
LA, CA near Santa Monica
The thing that annoys me the most Bing, is that people focus on that extraneous bull**** rather than Fox's actual weaknesses. Like, you know

1) how he has the worst range of any top tier, making dash/wavedash back a serious vulnerability among other things

2) how his hitboxes are inconsistent (dair is finnicky, uair is SDIable, dsmash is ground techable, nair is CCable to deathgrab up to 50+ %, shine hitstun gets canceled if they touch ground out of the air, etc)

3) how lasers are high risk low reward, and a corner camping fox is essentially committing to possible death for 3-6% at many distances

4) how his options when dropping through a platform are limited; his low range often requires him to jump or dash->shield drop first, costing time compared to top tier tactics like Marth/Sheik's dropthrough fair, Falcon's uair, Puff/Peach's floating/jumping, etc. The end result is that his angles of attack are much simpler than other characters, and often relegated to the edge of platforms (particularly the space between the edge of the top platform and the edge of the side platforms)...making him even MORE susceptible to dashdancing

5) how he requires momentum to do anything useful, making a cornered Fox really susceptible. For a character that uses platforms so much, its amazing how terrible his options are if he is on the corner of a side platform with the opponent controlling center stage.

etc

That is not to say that Fox isn't a super broken god of Melee...he is (killing power, shield pressure, dashdance, ledgedash, bair, blah blah blah), but I don't feel his weaknesses are as commonly discussed as other top tiers (see: Marth's lack of active frames, Sheik's weak approaches, Peach's slowness, etc)
 

ShroudedOne

Smash Hero
Premium
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
5,493
@JPOBS: Falco also dies on contact and is too slow to really get out of bad spots. But whatever. You're also saying that Peach is a better character than Fox (I think?), but I'm not going to get into that.

In my opinion, Fox's "highest potential" isn't a super technical Fox. It's a super lame one.

I also think Fox is really really really good at mitigating his weaknesses (besides the getting death comboed on, but Fox is really fast and can be good at not getting hit if people don't camp in corners like idiots).
 

JPOBS

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 26, 2007
Messages
5,821
Location
Mos Eisley
You don't need to be fast when you can control the opponent's character from anywhere onstage. Falco does whateer he wants
 

TheCrimsonBlur

Smash Master
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
3,406
Location
LA, CA near Santa Monica
Falco solves all 5 problems I listed

Lasers give him range...and not only that, but it reduces the opponent's range because they can no longer even ****ing dashdance anymore
There is nothing inconsistent about Falcos dair or shine
Falco lasers are low risk (most of the time...or at least most of the time against 90+% of players) high reward (stage control)
dropthrough lasers are awesome
you don't need momentum to laser

Falco has problems of his own, but, they aren't Fox's problems
 

ShroudedOne

Smash Hero
Premium
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
5,493
@Bones: "Nothing alike" is patently false.

@TCB: Yeah, I definitely agree about his dair and shine, at least. Not sure if I agree that drop-through lasers solve this problem for him, but he has other moves which do, too.
 

Fregadero

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
389
****ing falco. Everyone should agree that in todays meta hes above fox. Players and tournament results have shown this. Lets see if Javi can prove me wrong.

:phone:
 

Bing

Smash Master
Joined
Nov 8, 2010
Messages
4,885
Location
St.Catharines, Ontario, Canada
****ing falco. Everyone should agree that in todays meta hes above fox. Players and tournament results have shown this. Lets see if Javi can prove me wrong.

:phone:
Javi vs PP Apex 2012

what about Marth? I see MARTHa tied or maybe even high than fox at times.
Marth... no... he has very few bad MUs but he also doesnt have that many great MUs.
 
Top Bottom