Darxmarth23
Smash Champion
Link to original post: [drupal=1231]Marths Placement In June Tier List ?[/drupal]
Marths Tier Placement In June - Official Discussion!
Go to the latest page for the latest posts. This OP is very long. But keep reading if you want to read the OP and/or its updates!
Well, I'll make this short and sweet. Will Marth's tier placement rise or fall in the June tier list? We know that his meta game hasn't developed much since the last tier list, but we do know that some other characters has. How much will that effect his tier placement?
I know that its early to make guesses, but state what you think now. As we get more in-depth with this, we can start some nice debates!
My projection: Marth will stay where he.
Also: Get Fire Emblem Shadow Dragon when it comes to a store near you.
3/9/09
So far we have been debating and we have gotten some very nice predictions, and we are going more in-depth with this thread.
We have an interesting post by Pierce7d:
Another interesting post in this thread. This time by Shaya:
Emblem Lord
Marths Tier Placement In June - Official Discussion!
Go to the latest page for the latest posts. This OP is very long. But keep reading if you want to read the OP and/or its updates!
Well, I'll make this short and sweet. Will Marth's tier placement rise or fall in the June tier list? We know that his meta game hasn't developed much since the last tier list, but we do know that some other characters has. How much will that effect his tier placement?
I know that its early to make guesses, but state what you think now. As we get more in-depth with this, we can start some nice debates!
My projection: Marth will stay where he.
Also: Get Fire Emblem Shadow Dragon when it comes to a store near you.
3/9/09
So far we have been debating and we have gotten some very nice predictions, and we are going more in-depth with this thread.
We have an interesting post by Pierce7d:
4/7/09You guys are actually missing the lovely thing that's happening here.
Marth's three worst match-ups are Snake, MK, D3. Before, these were the top three characters in the game. Marth was lower on the tier list.
Then, certain characters moved up. Marth had an advantage on these characters, so he moved up.
Now, outta nowhere, Wario, Diddy, Olimar, and ZSS are all moving up. Marth wins against all of these characters, as well as Falco and G&W. In fact, Marth has a better match-up against every single character I listed in this paragraph than MK does. What does this mean? Marth will either maintain, or move up.
We might not have changed, but the Metagame around us changed, and now Wario and Diddy can help take out MK. Falco, Olimar, Diddy, and ZSS can help take down Snake. Marth's will have easier brackets.
For instance, I'm going to start placing better, because ADHD popped up in my region out of nowhere. Now, instead of fighting that MK or Snake that I would have a disadvantage against, I get to fight Diddy and advance another round. On top of this, Marth already has the tools to fight MK, and goes almost even with him with perfect play.
In today's Metagame, Marth is even more valuable than ever before. Sometimes, fighting 2 or 3 MKs consecutively could tire a Marth out, having to adjust to different styles, and playing perfectly every round. Now, with new characters entering the fray, and Marth having so many positive match-ups, Marth will be a powerful tool.
Another interesting post in this thread. This time by Shaya:
4/9/09D3 is probably getting smaller, while Snake is probably not.
Yes, there is a stigma about Marth.
And when it comes to Wario... maybe he'll be like the Melee Fox (everyone has a chaingrab/massive combos on him) but still be seen as "one of" the best.
I read someone people think Marth will go to 4th... I doubt this very much.
While Marth may do better against everyone whos moving up, Metaknight is still at the top, and overall dominates Marth and reduces his viability as a competitive character.
Whilst I hear/read that people using LOW TIERS (Pokemon Trainer for example) are taking matches/sets off of GOOD Metaknight users, it's rare I hear Marth doing much of that at all (at least if to compare as a ratio of how many more Marth mains there are compared to PT ones). It's such a depressing thing.
Emblem Lord
ph1lny3Pretty much every character has hit their ceiling. The top ten won't change and the top two characters MK and Snake aren't going anywhere. All of this is pointless. When you lose to the best characters there isn't much left to say.
Marth is great overall, but...you guys know the deal.
Originally Posted by ph1lny3
I'd say solidly 5th-ish. I've seen that some aspects of his have room to grow, and the problem with going only with character theory is that this only works in a perfect world. There will always be character bias, there will always be specifics, and most of all, there will be adaptation. The last reason alone is probably the main reason why D3, G&W, and falco (more or less) have been seeing just a little bit of decay, while marth, snake (with some improved methods) and newer scene characters have been doing well, paper theory doesn't always count the human element, and as much as they try, you will always get some deviation.
Tourney play looks at the human aspect more, which is really who plays the game, which is why it's hard to pinpoint game theory, since we don't have an established control per se (like Rybka or Deep Blue for chess), and we don't have as much time to develop. Overall, yes, tourney based listings are sometimes faulty and can lead to problematic/misleading metagame thoughts, but it certainly is a good element to incorporate on top of theoretical view.